Your guide to the region's top events, mixed with some commentary about life, media, gossip and politics in Washington, DC.

Downie to Vacate Post?

Share | Print

By Harry Jaffe Published Monday, March 24, 2008

The Washington Post newsroom is buzzing with rumors that executive editor Leonard Downie will take the buyout being offered to Post staffers.

Downie did not respond to e-mail request for comment, nor would anyone on the newspaper’s publishing side comment on or off the record. Still, the rumor has persisted and spread for more than a week, and Downie has not responded to his staff.

There are many reasons to discount the rumors.

Downie will complete 17 years as the Post’s top editor in September. He turns 66 in May. By many measures, he has been a strong leader, and the Graham family owes him a debt for loyalty and dedication.

Downie guided the Post through almost two decades of change and turmoil in daily newspapering. To meet the demand of the suburban readership, he launched the “Extras” zoned editions. He encouraged investigative reporting and projects. Some years the Post won scores of prizes, some years it didn’t do well in the big contests.

But Downie’s tenure has been dogged by declining circulation, falling revenues, and a series of buyouts that have drained the newsroom of talent and experience. The print newsroom on L Street in downtown DC is losing stature and momentum to the Post’s online publication, washingtonpost.com, based in Arlington.

Donald Graham, chair of the Post Company, was publisher of the newspaper when Downie took over from legendary editor Ben Bradlee. But while Graham is devoted to Downie and the newspaper, he has also shifted his attention and resources to washingtonpost.com and the broader concerns of the company, now dominated by its Kaplan educational unit.

While he could stay on as top editor, Len Downie might see this moment as an opportune time to step down.

Katherine Weymouth has just been named Post publisher, taking over from Don Graham and his close associate Boisfeuillet Jones. Weymouth, Don Graham’s niece, is also chief of the online operation, with the intention of making the two publications function together more smoothly.

Weymouth apparentaly is not sending any signals that it’s time for Downie to go; she hasn’t been at the helm long enough. But many reporters and editors believe Downie’s time has come and gone. At a time when newspapers have to change or die, many Posties see Downie stuck in the paper’s past.

Working among lots of East Coast elitists educated at Ivy League colleges, Downie often talks about his midwestern roots and degree from Ohio State University. The Post under Downie often has seemed leaden and stodgy, which has lead to comparisons between Downie’s leadership and Ohio State’s conservative ground game under its legendary football coach Woody Hayes: “Three yards and a cloud of dust.”

If Downie has decided to step aside, he certainly could do better than simply taking the buyout being offered to other staffers. The Grahams would be happy to give him a title and salary. Ben Bradlee is still a vice president and has an office in the executive suite.

But Downie has not groomed a successor. To the contrary, he has gone out of his way to choose a pliant lieutenant in Philip Bennett. In a Machiavellian way, choosing Bennett as his number two was smart. Bennett has delivered much of the bad news about buyouts and reassignments, which has allowed Downie to keep his hands somewhat clean during the bloodlettings of the past few years.

If Downie vacates his post, Katharine Weymouth will not find an obvious successor in the newsroom among the assistant managing editors beneath Bennett. All are capable, but none have the stature to become number one.
If she looks beyond the Post, some potential leaders stand out. One is Dean Baquet, Washington bureau chief for the New York Times. He became chief of the Washington bureau after leaving the top editor’s job at the Los Angeles Times in 2006 because he refused to go along with big staff cuts.

Or she could merge the newspaper and the fast-growing online operation under one editor, perhaps Jim Brady, now editor of washingtonpost.com.

Whether the newsroom rumors about Len Downie taking the buyout are accurate or not, his tenure at the Post is not likely to last much longer, and there is increasing talk within the paper about the post-Downie era.

Social Web
E-mail

| Washingtonian.com Blogs

Comments

The executive editorship of the Washington Post has been put into play by the paper’s publisher, Katharine Weymouth, who, according to a report in yesterday’s New York Times, has talked to a cluster of possible candidates and others about who should succeed Leonard Downie Jr.
------------
monu86
http://www.casualdate.net.au- http://www.casualdate.net.au

Posted by: monu86, Jan 15, 2009 08:04:06 AM

The Times identifies Newsweek’s Jon Meacham, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, former Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Marcus W. Brauchli, current and former Post managing editors Phil Bennett and Steve Coll, The New Yorker’s David Remnick (a former Postie), Washingtonpost.com Editor Liz Spayd, and Post columnist Eugene H. Robinson as Weymouth’s communicants. While every one of these veterans possesses the smarts and skills to edit today’s Washington Post, I would hope that Weymouth also consult a less Post-centric list of prospects and think more in terms of what sort of person should edit tomorrow’s paper.
---------------
sanju
[url=http://www.casualdate.net.au]dating[/url]- dating

Posted by: sanju86, Jan 15, 2009 08:02:18 AM

Downie’s focus on real news, real journalism and real reporting is not the past, is not stodgy, and is exactly what real newspapers should be focusing on now, today, in the present.he executive editorship of the Washington Post has been put into play by the paper’s publisher, Katharine Weymouth, who, according to a report in yesterday’s New York Times, has talked to a cluster of possible candidates and others about who should succeed Leonard Downie Jr.The Times identifies Newsweek’s Jon Meacham, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, former Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Marcus W. Brauchli, current and former Post managing editors Phil Bennett and Steve Coll, The New Yorker’s David Remnick (a former Postie), Washingtonpost.com Editor Liz Spayd, and Post columnist Eugene H. Robinson as Weymouth’s communicants. While every one of these veterans possesses the smarts and skills to edit today’s Washington Post, I would hope that Weymouth also consult a less Post-centric list of prospects and think more in terms of what sort of person should edit tomorrow’s paper.
-----------------
sanju
<a href="http://www.casualdate.net.au">dating</a>-dating

Posted by: sanju86, Jan 15, 2009 08:00:27 AM

Good grief, 17 paragraphs based on a rumor no one has confirmed. Just keep telling yourself this is big-time journalism.

Posted by: nogoatee, Mar 25, 2008 03:23:59 PM

Baquet could only be a candidate if his sister, who was a post employee when I was there, is gone or going.

Posted by: expostie, Mar 25, 2008 11:07:42 AM

There’s a bit of generalizing here. There’s no "end" of a "Downie era," there’s no real comparison between running a newspaper and running a college football team, there’s no lack of qualified people to succeed him in the Post newsroom, and the comments about "changing or dying" and "eras" are a bit overblown. The problems at the Post are literally the exact same, similar problems being experienced at every big-city newspaper nationwide, and that is not a generalization. The same problems have struck The New York Times, The L.A. Times, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, The Chicago Tribune, The Baltimore Sun, The Dallas Morning News, and literally hundreds of other newspapers. And, if you follow the zeitgeist, there are more people supporting the Downie way than newer ways in newspapers: most people see newer changes at papers as just dumbing down the papers and driving people away. Downie’s focus on real news, real journalism and real reporting is not the past, is not stodgy, and is exactly what real newspapers should be focusing on now, today, in the present. If anyting, Downie should stay where he is and concentrate on having the Post concentrate on real journalism, instead of dumb videos, blogs, chats and similar dumbed-down nonsense.

Posted by: thefrontpage, Mar 25, 2008 07:12:27 AM

If Downie goes, so go a whole domino chain of editors. The carnage is going to be incredible, but I’m told the WaPo execs have already concluded the newspaper is far too editor-dominated, and evictions were certain after the recent streamlining of copy editing tasks, which left many editors with nothing to do but read the newspaper.

Posted by: edwardallen, Mar 24, 2008 07:56:11 PM

Downie to Vacate Post?

Comments

Post a comment

Make Mine a Single: Valentine’s Parties Where You Don’t Need a Date

Tuesday, February 9 at 11 AM