Your guide to the region's top events, mixed with some commentary about life, media, gossip and politics in Washington, DC.

Ron Klain: How Kevin Spacey Played Me on HBO

By Kim Eisler   Published Tuesday, May 27, 2008

HBO begins airing its movie Recount in late May—a dramatic replay of the vote-counting battle after the almost-tied 2000 presidential election.

The role of Ron Klain, onetime chief of staff to Vice President Al Gore, is played by Kevin Spacey. Spacey is now 49 and balding; Klain was in his late thirties and looked even younger in 2000. Or, as Klain’s wife, Monica, observes, “He may be better-looking than you and more glamorous—but you have a full head of hair, and he doesn’t!”

Klain, a former partner at O’Melveny & Myers who now is general counsel to Revolution LLC, says he didn’t have approval over the movie and was never asked who might play him. Nor did Spacey try to learn his mannerisms. But Klain did get out of the deal a photo of Spacey with Monica and their three children.

 

“It’s weird to see some actor playing you,” Klain says. Certainly that would be true for Klain’s former law-firm boss, Warren Christopher, played by British actor John Hurt.

But perhaps such inaccuracies beat the alternative. George W. Bush’s Washington lawyer Ted Olson, who argued the winning side at the US Supreme Court, is barely mentioned. Says Olson, “Much of what happens in this movie is not familiar to me.”

Historical revisionism has its limits: In the end, Bush does win.

This article appears in the June 2008 issue of Washingtonian. To see more articles in this issue, click here.

More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Society Photos

Comments


I watched the 2000 results all night long, up til about 5 am. I forgot how long and drawn out the recount process became. Like they say in the movie, even if Gore had won, he wouldn’t have won. Republican forces were in play and had the upper hand. It’s a bit sad to remember this pathetic time in our history. How could Bush have won again in 2004? It had to be due to the country’s fear of terrorism. As is becoming very evident now, Bush will go down in history as one of the worst presidents ever. That said, I voted for McCain in 2008.

Posted by: Bo, Nov 18, 2008 01:15:09 AM

Movie was fine--would have liked an "addendum" that the Post & the Times DID count the ballots--and Bush still won.

Posted by: Tony Iovino, Nov 16, 2008 09:45:31 AM

Movie was fine--would have liked an "addendum" that the Post & the Times DID count the ballots--and Bush still one.

Posted by: Tony Iovino, Nov 16, 2008 09:45:04 AM

I couldn’t watch the movie. I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to watch the movie.

Posted by: Jason, Nov 13, 2008 10:16:15 AM

Funny - I don’t think we watched the same movie.

I thought this film showed the complexity of running an election in a state with strong county governments, and reps for both parties deeply entrenched in state and local government.

That, coupled with different ways of voting, confusing butterfly ballots (approved by both parties), and dimpled/hanging chad....what a mess.

There are no "innocent" political parties here - both sides play the game. But it’s hardly the end of democracy. Voting anomalies have been an issue in every close election, and will continue to cause problems until a single standard hack-proof way of voting is in use.

Bottom line - in spite of all the pro-Gore whining, Bush didn’t steal the election.

As Spacey says early in the movie when asked about Gore losing the popular vote, but winning the electoral college...Gore would expect Bush to abide by the electoral process.

Same goes for the Gore loyalists.

And for those about to jump - I’m a registered independent. I don’t care about nor do I care for party politics.

Posted by: Fred, Oct 26, 2008 01:28:47 PM

Justice was not served in the 2000 recount. It may be too much to expect that the "flaws" (to Democrats; "situation" to Republicans) relative to the voting systems (which was the proximate cause of the confusion/disenfranchisement, depending on your outlook) will be rigorously reexamined prior to subsequent elections--which could happen elsewhere besides Florida--to be straightened out. County budgets are vulnerable to superior levels of government takings--and there are those who have a vested interest in preventing upgrades so that all votes cast are actually tabulated . . .

Posted by: bitterblogger, Oct 14, 2008 08:53:56 PM

Just watched the movie and it still sickens me seeing the events unfold all over again. In my eyes, that was a clear case of democracy coming to an end. It scares me how the few can control a population by any means possible. We must not allow the few to control our actions through fear, through divide-and-conquer tactics, through negative campaigning, or through outright illegal actions. We MUST vote to put the right people in power because you never know when a crises will happen and who will be at the helm to directly affect that crises. We must be responsible citizens to restore this country because we live here, because we love it, and our children will have to live with how it was governed today.

Posted by: Yasmine, Oct 11, 2008 03:25:17 PM

Having just watched the movie and reliving the events of the 2000 election, i found this site. I feel compelled to post even though the movie was released several months ago. The movie was well done and seemed to be fairly even handed -- showing the flaws and sincere perspectives of both the Gore and Bush loyalists. That even hand is a rare event in my opinion. The one thing I think they should have done is to roll at the end of the movie the outcome of the media’s recount post election. Additionally, one day, I can only hope that HBO or some other outlet will dedicate a similar quality attempt to tell the story of other election issues. I won’t hold my breath, but can certainly hold out hope.

Posted by: Bryan, Oct 08, 2008 10:16:46 PM

Having just watched the movie and reliving the events of the 2000 election, i found this site. I feel compelled to post even though the movie was released several months ago. The movie was well done and seemed to be fairly even handed -- showing the flaws and sincere perspectives of both the Gore and Bush loyalists. That even hand is a rare event in my opinion. The one thing I think they should have done is to roll at the end of the movie the outcome of the media’s recount post election. Additionally, one day, I can only hope that HBO or some other outlet will dedicate a similar quality attempt to tell the story of other election issues. I won’t hold my breath, but can certainly hold out hope.

Posted by: Bryan, Oct 08, 2008 10:16:15 PM

Finally, a non-happy end movie from Hollywood about the behind the scene developments during the 2000 elections.

Thank you, Hollywood. Gore did win the election, even after $4 billions spent by Harris on creating an extended purge list that tilted the vote count with thousands in favor of Bush. All the fraud aside, Gore must have had a strong win in Florida, if a fair election were to take place. Someone new that and did not like it. Who is my question?

Will the ballots ever be counted? What should happen to reopen the dust covered boxes and do that?

Posted by: Zori, Oct 04, 2008 06:56:36 PM

The 2000 election made me cheer at times and cry at others. This movie just reminded me of how mad I was at that time and has made me more unsure of the upcoming election. I won’t vote for Obama (not enough experience) and don’t want a Republican. How I wish Gore would run again...

Posted by: susan, May 31, 2008 07:00:27 PM

I found it difficult to watch the movie. Although it was well done, knowing the ending and just how high a price we have all paid for the criminally flawed election in Florida is hard to stomach. It exposes just how broken our democracy is. However, this story must be told and lessons from it learned!
As a history/government teacher I am glad to report that my students are engaged for the first time, largely because of Barack Obama.
I hope he can restore our democracy!

Posted by: Lisa, May 28, 2008 10:19:46 PM

Mr. Spacey is arguably one of the greatest actors of our time and the comment about him portraying Mr.Klain is about his hairline? I would think it an honor instead. Historical revisionism has it’s limits but the reality is we got stuck with a tragic end for which we will continue to pay forward for generations.

Posted by: Yolanda, May 27, 2008 02:55:00 PM

Post a comment

Feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. Because of the prevalence of spam, we ask that you fill out the code in the image below to help us eliminate spam comments. By posting here, you affirm that you are 13 years of age or older. Washingtonian.com reserves the right to remove or edit content once posted.

Find A ...
Find A Restaurant







  1. Only show Delivery
    Only show Kid Friendly
    Only show Late Night
    Only show Party Space
    Only show Weekend Brunch
Find Events




Find A Happy Hour





  1. search_finda.gif
Find A Spa




  1. search_finda.gif
Find a Home





  1. search_finda.gif
  2. Powered by  
Find A Hotel


  1.   


  2. Reviewed by Washingtonian
  3. Kid Friendly     Valet Parking
    Handicap Accessible    

  4. Childcare
    WiFi
    Pet Friendly
    Bar/Lounge/Dining
    Airport Shuttle
    Salon/Spa
    Swimming Pool
    Fitness Room
    On-site Drycleaning
    Meeting Rooms
    Golf
    Tennis Courts
    Game Room
  5. search_finda.gif
Newsletter Signup
  1. Where & When
  2. Shop Around
  3. Dining Out
  4. Bridal Party
  5. Kliman Online
  6. Learn more sign_up.gif
 

Where & When: What to Do This Weekend

Candlelit holiday tours, a Capitol Hill Santa bar crawl, lots of Prohibition-repeal bar parties, film festivals, and more are all in this weekend’s picks. more