In case you've ever wondered exactly how DC's men stack up against those in the rest of our country, well, here's one answer: According to surely very scientific research, the DC company Grooming Lounge ranks its hometown's guys as the third most handsome nationwide, lagging behind only Seattle and San Francisco. New York and Los Angeles came in at numbers six and 16, respectively. Miami fell dead last. Cleveland--Cleveland--has a more handsome male population than Miami does.
The District is the tenth-worst city for families, according to WalletHub, a personal-finance website that churns out rankings of cities according to random aesthetic criteria (i.e., "Best and Worst Cities for Hockey Fans.") WalletHub's staff analyzed education systems, health and safety metrics, housing affordability, income levels, and recreational amenities across the 150 most populous cities in the United States and found that Washington is only marginally better than places like New Orleans, Miami, and Detroit for raising the little ones.
Washington landed in the top half of cities in a couple of categories—playgrounds per 100,000 residents and median family income adjusted for the cost of living—but near the bottom in most others. Some are easily identifiable matters: DC ranked 123rd in housing affordability and 130th for violent crime.
But some of the District's other limitations as a family town, at least according to WalletHub's rules, are demographic. The site ranks DC at 132nd in the percentage of households with children, not much of a shocker considering much of the District's recent growth over the past decade has been fueled by childless singles and seniors "aging in place." The 2010 US Census found that 44 percent of households in the District are occupied by single adults. And couples in DC are less likely to have children than the national average—just 7.9 percent of husband-wife households had kids under 18 living with them, compared to a national rate of 20.2 percent, according to the Census.
If you want a family-friendly city, WalletHub recommends moving to Overland Park, Kansas or Plano, Texas, which nabbed the top two spots. But tenth-worst seems a bit harsh, especially when there are many documented things for families around here.
Our fair city has plenty of wonderful things to recommend it to tourists and lifers alike: museums, restaurants, monuments, you name it. But live here long enough and you find out some experiences just aren't all they're cracked up to be. We've got a few ideas for what those are, but we want to know what you think. So tell us in the poll below: What's the most overrated activity or institution Washington has to offer? Pick as many as you think apply—and if something isn't on the list that you think deserves to be, let us know in the comments.
The latest edition of U.S. News and World Report's increasingly criticized but still frequently touted (at least by nervous parents and high school guidance counselors) list of the nation's best universities dropped yesterday, and several local schools made an impressive showing.
- College of William and Mary, No. 32
- George Washington University, No. 52
- University of Maryland, No. 62
- Virginia Tech, No. 69
- American University, No. 75
- Howard University, No. 142
In case advocates of biking, walking, and public transportation needed more in the arsenal to encourage Washington-area residents to refrain from driving Allstate Insurance dutifully supplied it. Drivers who live in DC are the worst among a ranking of nearly all of the 200 biggest US cities, crashing their cars more than twice as often as the national average. And motorists who live in the suburbs aren't much better. Washington finished dead last in a ranking of 195 cities, holding on to an ignominious standing it also nabbed last year. On average, DC drivers go 4.8 years between accidents, according to Allstate. But people just outside the District have no reason to smirk at accident-prone Washington. Residents of Alexandria, which finished in 188th place, get in collisions an average of once every 6.2 years, while 185th-ranked Arlington drivers crash every 6.7 years. And Baltimore finished just one rung from the bottom. Of course, the rankings are a little tenuous. The figures are based solely on claims filed with Allstate, and in general, drivers in big cities smash up their vehicles far more often than those in small towns. New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Miami were all in the bottom 25, too. But there might be a silver lining in another survey put out today by the US Public Interest Research Group which states that in general, people in DC—and elsewhere around the country—are driving less. PIRG's report states that the rate at which DC residents drive peaked in 2003, but that since then, the number of miles spent in cars by an average Washingtonian has dipped by 14.4 percent. In 2011, PIRG reports, the typical DC resident traveled 5,774 vehicle-miles, down from 7,371 in 2003. Only Alaska experienced a bigger drop off its peak driving year. The declines were more sluggish in Virginia and Maryland, though still considerable. Virginia residents traveled an average of 10,001 miles by car in 2011, down 5.8 percent from the peak of 10,753 in 1999. In Maryland, the average distance driven declined to 9,646 miles in 2011, off a peak of 10,057 four years earlier.
American billionaires are getting richer. In its new list of the richest American billionaires, Forbes notes that the dozen on the magazine’s cover, including Washington’s David Rubenstein and Steve Case, are worth a combined $126 billion. The combined net worth of the 400 Americans who make up the full list is $1.7 trillion. Furthermore, back when the list started in 1982, the cutoff for the list was a net worth of $75 million. Now it’s $1.1 billion.