Washington Post sports columnist
Sally Jenkins has been Lance Armstrong’s most steadfast supporter. How will she respond to the
latest reports that Armstrong relied on performance-enhancing drugs to win all seven
of his Tour de France titles?
When the US Anti-Doping Agency accused Armstrong in August of ingesting drugs to fuel
his climbs in the mountains of France and sprints toward Paris, Jenkins took to the
pages of the
Post.
“First of all,” she wrote, “Lance Armstrong is a good man.” She added: “I do know
that he beat cancer fair and square, that he’s not the mastermind criminal the USADA
makes him out to be, and that the process for stripping him of his titles reeks.”
Three paragraphs into her August 24
column,
she mentioned she has written two books with Armstrong. Her
defense is well founded.
What now? How will Jenkins defend Armstrong from the reams of documents the USADA
released this week? The agency backs up its damning dossier with financial records,
laboratory results, and witness testimony. Eleven former teammates testified that
Armstrong employed a variety of ruses to evade blood testing that might have incriminated
him. Among them are veteran cyclists
George Hincapie,
Tyler Hamilton, and
Floyd Landis, who himself was stripped of the 2006 Tour title on doping charges.
When USADA first announced its charges in August, Jenkins attacked the messenger.
She asked, “How does an agency that is supposed to regulate drug testing strip a guy
of seven titles without a single positive drug test?”
The USADA appears to have answered that question. It recounts how Armstrong deliberately
avoided testing through a warning system. On one occasion, according to the USADA,
Armstrong dropped out of a race when a teammate alerted him that drug testers were
at the team’s hotel.
Sally Jenkins is one of the
Post’s most brave and incisive columnists. In the case of Lance Armstrong, she has tied
herself to his fortunes, to his veracity, to his worthiness as a champion. If he takes
a fall, will she write about it? Will she take one, too?
Jenkins has yet to respond to questions about whether she would write about Armstrong’s
latest travails. Her readers deserve her take.
What Is Post Columnist Sally Jenkins’s Take on Latest Lance Armstrong Charges?
Washington Post sports columnist
Sally Jenkins has been Lance Armstrong’s most steadfast supporter. How will she respond to the
latest reports that Armstrong relied on performance-enhancing drugs to win all seven
of his Tour de France titles?
When the US Anti-Doping Agency accused Armstrong in August of ingesting drugs to fuel
his climbs in the mountains of France and sprints toward Paris, Jenkins took to the
pages of the
Post.
“First of all,” she wrote, “Lance Armstrong is a good man.” She added: “I do know
that he beat cancer fair and square, that he’s not the mastermind criminal the USADA
makes him out to be, and that the process for stripping him of his titles reeks.”
Three paragraphs into her August 24
column,
she mentioned she has written two books with Armstrong. Her
defense is well founded.
What now? How will Jenkins defend Armstrong from the reams of documents the USADA
released this week? The agency backs up its damning dossier with financial records,
laboratory results, and witness testimony. Eleven former teammates testified that
Armstrong employed a variety of ruses to evade blood testing that might have incriminated
him. Among them are veteran cyclists
George Hincapie,
Tyler Hamilton, and
Floyd Landis, who himself was stripped of the 2006 Tour title on doping charges.
When USADA first announced its charges in August, Jenkins attacked the messenger.
She asked, “How does an agency that is supposed to regulate drug testing strip a guy
of seven titles without a single positive drug test?”
The USADA appears to have answered that question. It recounts how Armstrong deliberately
avoided testing through a warning system. On one occasion, according to the USADA,
Armstrong dropped out of a race when a teammate alerted him that drug testers were
at the team’s hotel.
Sally Jenkins is one of the
Post’s most brave and incisive columnists. In the case of Lance Armstrong, she has tied
herself to his fortunes, to his veracity, to his worthiness as a champion. If he takes
a fall, will she write about it? Will she take one, too?
Jenkins has yet to respond to questions about whether she would write about Armstrong’s
latest travails. Her readers deserve her take.
Must-Reads
Take Our Restaurant Survey and You Could Win Dinner at a Mike Isabella Restaurant
10 Fall Festivals Near DC That You Don’t Want to Miss
Washingtonian’s Great Places to Work Application
DC is Getting an All-Male Burlesque Brunch
September 2016: How to Dress in DC
More from News & Politics
The Huffington Post’s Eliot Nelson Doesn’t Mind if You Read His Book on the Toilet
Man Stabbed Over Drunk Food in a Crime Most DC
Presidential Debates Aren’t About Style or Substance. They’re About Pressure
Do Women Have to Talk Like Men to Be Taken Seriously? And Should They?
Photos and Scenes From the African American History Museum’s Opening Day
How History Museums Around the US Have Presented the African American Experience
Frederick Could Be an Urban Suburb of DC–Unless Its Good Ol’ Boy Past Gets in Its Way
Road Closures, Traffic Detours, and Security Information for the African American History Museum Opening
Most Popular
The Best Cheap Restaurants in Washington, DC
100 Very Best Restaurants
9 New Restaurants to Try Now
How One Couple Transformed a Virginia Estate into the Ultimate Southern Lawn Party Wedding
I Was at the Montgomery Mall During the Shooting. This Is What It Was Like Inside.