Think that DC’s roadways today are ruled by an epic clash between cyclists and drivers? It was way worse for two-wheeled riders in 1982.
The District Department of Transportation just dug up a 32-year-old manual it used to distribute to the District’s cyclists back when bikes were scarce on city streets and more likely to be scolded than encouraged by the authorities.
The manual includes dozens of pages describing “D.C. Bikeways,” including most of the bridges that cross the Potomac and Anacostia river, but don’t mistake them for actual cycling paths—they’re just arbitrarily assigned corridors where street signs were affixed with “Bike Route” signs, markers that most urban cyclists interpret as not really carving out a safe co-existence with cars.
As for actual bike infrastructure, the District circa 1982 had just two marked bike lanes: 11th Street, Southeast, from East Capitol Street to the 11th Street Bridge, and East Capitol Street between the Capitol Building and Robert F. Kennedy Stadium. Throughout the rest of the city, the manual just lists the “Bike Route” signs and for much of the District, encourages riding on the sidewalk. (Although, the Washington Post’sJohn Kelly will be relieved to know that biking on sidewalks downtown has always been prohibited.)
Bike ownership was also a tightly controlled activity when this manual was written. The District required all bike owners to register their rides within two weeks of purchasing them. While registration was cheap—$1 for five years—it was enforced randomly, and sometimes led to complaints of police confiscating bikes from owners who simply didn’t follow the low-compliance statute. (Bike registration didn’t come off the books until 2008, and the Metropolitan Police Department now recommends that cyclists join the National Bike Registry instead.)
And what about taking a bike on Metro? These days, it’s only verboten to bring one on a train during rush hour. In 1982, bikes were only permitted on Metro on the weekends, and only then with a special permit.
Perhaps the most antiquated item in this manual—Courtland Milloy might disagree—is an institutional statement from DDOT saying that “the majority of bicycle/motor vehicle accidents in the District are caused by bicyclists.” A quick glance at the five most common types of bike-car collisions, according to Bicycling magazine, including blind left turns and dooring, show that in most cases, it’s actually the car’s fault. Fortunately, DDOT’s current guidelines are more balanced.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
The District Used to Be Really Tough on Bicycles
Bike registration, Metro permits, and blaming cyclists for most collisions were all featured in a 1982 city brochure about cycling.
Think that DC’s roadways today are ruled by an epic clash between cyclists and drivers? It was way worse for two-wheeled riders in 1982.
The District Department of Transportation just dug up a 32-year-old manual it used to distribute to the District’s cyclists back when bikes were scarce on city streets and more likely to be scolded than encouraged by the authorities.
The manual includes dozens of pages describing “D.C. Bikeways,” including most of the bridges that cross the Potomac and Anacostia river, but don’t mistake them for actual cycling paths—they’re just arbitrarily assigned corridors where street signs were affixed with “Bike Route” signs, markers that most urban cyclists interpret as not really carving out a safe co-existence with cars.
As for actual bike infrastructure, the District circa 1982 had just two marked bike lanes: 11th Street, Southeast, from East Capitol Street to the 11th Street Bridge, and East Capitol Street between the Capitol Building and Robert F. Kennedy Stadium. Throughout the rest of the city, the manual just lists the “Bike Route” signs and for much of the District, encourages riding on the sidewalk. (Although, the Washington Post’s John Kelly will be relieved to know that biking on sidewalks downtown has always been prohibited.)
Bike ownership was also a tightly controlled activity when this manual was written. The District required all bike owners to register their rides within two weeks of purchasing them. While registration was cheap—$1 for five years—it was enforced randomly, and sometimes led to complaints of police confiscating bikes from owners who simply didn’t follow the low-compliance statute. (Bike registration didn’t come off the books until 2008, and the Metropolitan Police Department now recommends that cyclists join the National Bike Registry instead.)
And what about taking a bike on Metro? These days, it’s only verboten to bring one on a train during rush hour. In 1982, bikes were only permitted on Metro on the weekends, and only then with a special permit.
Perhaps the most antiquated item in this manual—Courtland Milloy might disagree—is an institutional statement from DDOT saying that “the majority of bicycle/motor vehicle accidents in the District are caused by bicyclists.” A quick glance at the five most common types of bike-car collisions, according to Bicycling magazine, including blind left turns and dooring, show that in most cases, it’s actually the car’s fault. Fortunately, DDOT’s current guidelines are more balanced.
Read the full document below.
Find Benjamin Freed on Twitter at @brfreed.
Getting Around Washington by Bicycle
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Inside the Library of Congress’s Collection
Trump Wants to Prosecute Beyoncé, That DC “Worst Traffic” Study Is Flawed, and Our Food Critic Tried Lucky Danger
Apparently Those “5 Things” Emails Were “Not Efficient,” Cheryl Hines Thinks DC Is a “Deadbeat Town,” and You Should Go See Some Punk Rock at the Library
Congressman Proposes Renaming Entire Kennedy Center for Trump, Poll Says Most Americans Are Paying Attention to Epstein Story, and We Tell You Where to Get a Mahjong Game
No One Wants to Buy Trump Books Anymore, Washington Post Loses Big Names, and We Got a Peek at the Renovated Air and Space Museum
Washingtonian Magazine
August Issue: Best Burgers
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Need to Know What Time It Is? 6 Places to Find a Sundial Around DC.
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
More from News & Politics
Journalists Savor Prospect of Pete Hegseth Running for Office, Trump Wants a White House Ballroom, and Katie Ledecky Won Another World Title
Eric Adjepong on Mixing Tradition and Modernity at His DC Restaurant Elmina
Can the Education Department Really Force Virginia Schools to Change Their Policies About Trans Kids?
Rax King’s New Essay Collection Celebrates the “Sloppy” Side of DC Culture
Congressman Proposes Renaming Entire Kennedy Center for Trump, Poll Says Most Americans Are Paying Attention to Epstein Story, and We Tell You Where to Get a Mahjong Game
DC Council Votes to Slow Down and Cap Tipped Wage Increases
Trump Wants to Prosecute Beyoncé, That DC “Worst Traffic” Study Is Flawed, and Our Food Critic Tried Lucky Danger
Too Hot for Ice Cream? Store Owners Say Extreme Heat Actually Keeps Customers at Home.