A report released Thursday by the auditor of the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program—better known as TARP—targets the DC-based law firm Venable for its billing practices. This isn’t the first time Venable, which was one of several firms contracted by Treasury to work on the bank bailout program, has come under fire for its billing.
Today’s report by the Special Inspector General for TARP finds possible problems with $676,840—or about two-thirds—of more than $1 million in legal fees that Venable billed to the Treasury Department. Venable’s invoices were vague, the report contends, with the firm’s use of “block-billing,” or single charges that included several tasks without specifying the time spent on each, singled out as especially egregious. Auditors also place blame on Treasury officials for lax oversight of the legal tab. Ultimately, though, they could not determine whether Venable did anything improper because the bills were too vague to support such a conclusion.
Venable’s billing practices were at the center of another controversy in 2007, when an investigation by DC Auditor Deborah Nichols concluded the firm had overcharged the city more than $250,000 for its work on securing land for the new Nationals baseball stadium. That report found that Venable had charged higher rates than were laid out in its 2005 contract, and also improperly billed the city for expenses such as meals.
Then-DC Council chairman (now DC mayor) Vincent Gray responded that he had never seen “a contract more poorly administered than this one.” At the time, Venable told the Legal Times that it had agreed to cut about $300,000 off the city’s legal tab to correct any errors.
Washingtonian.com has reached out to Venable for comment on its billing practices, and we will update when we hear back.
UPDATE: In an e-mailed statement, Venable says the firm "fully cooperated with the Treasury Department's reporting requirements" and is confident that "Treasury received fair value" for the services provided. The firm's spokeswoman did not return a call seeking comment on Venable's billing practices in general.
Venable Under Fire for TARP Billing Practices
Not the first time the firm has run into trouble
A report released Thursday by the auditor of the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program—better known as TARP—targets the DC-based law firm Venable for its billing practices. This isn’t the first time Venable, which was one of several firms contracted by Treasury to work on the bank bailout program, has come under fire for its billing.
Today’s report by the Special Inspector General for TARP finds possible problems with $676,840—or about two-thirds—of more than $1 million in legal fees that Venable billed to the Treasury Department. Venable’s invoices were vague, the report contends, with the firm’s use of “block-billing,” or single charges that included several tasks without specifying the time spent on each, singled out as especially egregious. Auditors also place blame on Treasury officials for lax oversight of the legal tab. Ultimately, though, they could not determine whether Venable did anything improper because the bills were too vague to support such a conclusion.
Venable’s billing practices were at the center of another controversy in 2007, when an investigation by DC Auditor Deborah Nichols concluded the firm had overcharged the city more than $250,000 for its work on securing land for the new Nationals baseball stadium. That report found that Venable had charged higher rates than were laid out in its 2005 contract, and also improperly billed the city for expenses such as meals.
Then-DC Council chairman (now DC mayor) Vincent Gray responded that he had never seen “a contract more poorly administered than this one.” At the time, Venable told the Legal Times that it had agreed to cut about $300,000 off the city’s legal tab to correct any errors.
Washingtonian.com has reached out to Venable for comment on its billing practices, and we will update when we hear back.
UPDATE: In an e-mailed statement, Venable says the firm "fully cooperated with the Treasury Department's reporting requirements" and is confident that "Treasury received fair value" for the services provided. The firm's spokeswoman did not return a call seeking comment on Venable's billing practices in general.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
What to Know About the Dupont Circle “Deckover” Project
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Bans on Underage Vaping, Swastika Graffiti, Synthetic Dyes: New Virginia Laws Go Into Effect in July
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair
For DNC Chair Ken Martin, the Big Beautiful Bill Is Personal
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
We’re Still Litigating “Obliterated,” Apparently; Man Deported After Kicking Dog at Dulles; and “Big Balls” Is Back on the Job
Did Busy Pizza Shops Really Predict US Airstrikes on Iran?
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Behind the Scenes of Our Cover Photo Shoot With Alex Ovechkin