The argument over whether the District should relax restrictions on its skyline will face its most important test next week when competing proposals submitted by the DC government and the National Capital Planning Commission finally come before Congress.
The House Oversight Committee, which oversees all things releated to the District, will hold a hearing Monday to hear arguments from the NCPC, which advocates leaving the 1910 Height Act virtually unchanged, and the DC Office of Planning, which is pushing for significant alterations.
The committee’s chairman, California Republican Darrell Issa, scheduled the hearing less than two weeks after a prolonged NCPC session in which members of the public tore into the DC government’s proposal for slightly taller buildings downtown and no limit on building height in a few other parts of the city. Some witnesses called for the resignation of city planning director Harriet Tregoning, who coordinated the District’s report on the Height Act. Others swore blood oaths against ever changing the Height Act.
The hearing, titled “Changes to the Heights Act: Shaping Washington, D.C., for the Future, Part II,” comes a little more than a year after Issa asked the District and the NCPC to look into amending the Height Act as Washington’s population continues expanding. A spokesman for Issa says the only witnesses at next week’s hearing will from Tregoning’s office and the NCPC. Members of the public looking to submit their written comments—blood oaths or otherwise—are invited to e-mail them to Ali.Ahmad@mail.house.gov.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Height Act Arguments Go to Congress Next Week
The fight over whether DC should have a taller skyline is moving to the next stage.
The argument over whether the District should relax restrictions on its skyline will face its most important test next week when competing proposals submitted by the DC government and the National Capital Planning Commission finally come before Congress.
The House Oversight Committee, which oversees all things releated to the District, will hold a hearing Monday to hear arguments from the NCPC, which advocates leaving the 1910 Height Act virtually unchanged, and the DC Office of Planning, which is pushing for significant alterations.
The committee’s chairman, California Republican Darrell Issa, scheduled the hearing less than two weeks after a prolonged NCPC session in which members of the public tore into the DC government’s proposal for slightly taller buildings downtown and no limit on building height in a few other parts of the city. Some witnesses called for the resignation of city planning director Harriet Tregoning, who coordinated the District’s report on the Height Act. Others swore blood oaths against ever changing the Height Act.
The hearing, titled “Changes to the Heights Act: Shaping Washington, D.C., for the Future, Part II,” comes a little more than a year after Issa asked the District and the NCPC to look into amending the Height Act as Washington’s population continues expanding. A spokesman for Issa says the only witnesses at next week’s hearing will from Tregoning’s office and the NCPC. Members of the public looking to submit their written comments—blood oaths or otherwise—are invited to e-mail them to Ali.Ahmad@mail.house.gov.
See also: Federal Commission Votes to Leave Height Act Unchanged
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
What to Know About the Dupont Circle “Deckover” Project
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Bans on Underage Vaping, Swastika Graffiti, Synthetic Dyes: New Virginia Laws Go Into Effect in July
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair
For DNC Chair Ken Martin, the Big Beautiful Bill Is Personal
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
We’re Still Litigating “Obliterated,” Apparently; Man Deported After Kicking Dog at Dulles; and “Big Balls” Is Back on the Job
Did Busy Pizza Shops Really Predict US Airstrikes on Iran?
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Behind the Scenes of Our Cover Photo Shoot With Alex Ovechkin