A federal judge on Thursday struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage, writing that the state constitution amendment adopted by voters in 2006 violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
The ruling issued by Judge Arenda Wright Allen of US District Court in Norfolk, is the latest federal rebuke of a state-level prohibition on same-sex marriage and is certain to push marriage equality toward the Supreme Court again. Wright Allen stayed her ruling pending an appeal, meaning that gay and lesbian couples in Virginia cannot start marrying just yet.
Although her ruling cannot take effect, Wright Allen’s opinion was particularly strong, opening with a long quote from Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the 1967 Supreme Court case that overturned Virginia’s ban on mixed-race marriages.
“Justice has often been forged from fires of indignities and prejudices suffered,” Wright Allen wrote. “Our triumphs that celebrate the freedom of choice are hallowed. We have arrived upon another moment in history when We the People becomes more inclusive, and our freedom more perfect.”
The case, Bostic v. Rainey, was filed last year by a gay couple in Norfolk whose request for a marriage license was turned down. Virgina’s new attorney general, Mark Herring, said on January 23 that the state would no longer defend the marriage amendment, a reversal from his predecessor, Ken Cuccinelli. The plaintiffs are being represented by David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who also represented the California couples in last year’s Supreme Court case that brought down that state’s same-sex marriage ban.
“This decision is a victory for the Constitution and for treating everyone equally under the law,” said Herring, who filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs after switching the state’s position. “The legal process will continue to play out in the months to come, but this decision shows that Virginia, like America, is coming to a better place in recognizing that every Virginian deserves to be treated equally and fairly.”
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional, Says Federal Judge
The ruling overturns the ban adopted in 2006, but won’t take effect pending an appeal.
A federal judge on Thursday struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage, writing that the state constitution amendment adopted by voters in 2006 violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
The ruling issued by Judge Arenda Wright Allen of US District Court in Norfolk, is the latest federal rebuke of a state-level prohibition on same-sex marriage and is certain to push marriage equality toward the Supreme Court again. Wright Allen stayed her ruling pending an appeal, meaning that gay and lesbian couples in Virginia cannot start marrying just yet.
Although her ruling cannot take effect, Wright Allen’s opinion was particularly strong, opening with a long quote from Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the 1967 Supreme Court case that overturned Virginia’s ban on mixed-race marriages.
“Justice has often been forged from fires of indignities and prejudices suffered,” Wright Allen wrote. “Our triumphs that celebrate the freedom of choice are hallowed. We have arrived upon another moment in history when We the People becomes more inclusive, and our freedom more perfect.”
The case, Bostic v. Rainey, was filed last year by a gay couple in Norfolk whose request for a marriage license was turned down. Virgina’s new attorney general, Mark Herring, said on January 23 that the state would no longer defend the marriage amendment, a reversal from his predecessor, Ken Cuccinelli. The plaintiffs are being represented by David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who also represented the California couples in last year’s Supreme Court case that brought down that state’s same-sex marriage ban.
“This decision is a victory for the Constitution and for treating everyone equally under the law,” said Herring, who filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs after switching the state’s position. “The legal process will continue to play out in the months to come, but this decision shows that Virginia, like America, is coming to a better place in recognizing that every Virginian deserves to be treated equally and fairly.”
Bostic Opinion by Benjamin Freed
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
What It Felt Like for a Virginia Marching Band to Win Metallica’s Contest
Meet the 2023 Washingtonians of the Year
What’s IN and OUT in DC Restaurant Trends for 2024
Introducing 8 of DC’s Most Stylish
Washingtonian Magazine
April 2024: Great Places to Live
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
13 Major Concerts and Music Festivals in the DC Area This Spring
Mary Timony on Her Emotional New Album, “Untame the Tiger”
The Beatles in DC: A New Exhibit in Maryland Looks Back on Early Beatlemania
Northern Virginia High School Wins Metallica’s Marching Band Competition
More from News & Politics
The Capital Pride Parade Won’t Go Through Dupont Circle This Year
Why Did WAMU Close DCist?
Botox In Your Twenties? More People Under 30 Are Getting Cosmetic Treatments
Did Eugene Vindman Pose With a Confederate Flag?
Want to See Caitlin Clark Play in DC? Prepare to Shell Out Some $$$.
Hozier and Laufey Will Headline This Year’s All Things Go Festival
Move Over, Pennsylvania Avenue: Study Says Wharf Area Is DC’s Priciest Real Estate
DC Cyclists Aren’t Giving Up on Connecticut Avenue Bike Lanes