Why Didn’t the Washington Post Put Hillary Clinton’s Photo on Its Front Page?

Hillary Clinton became the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party last night, the first woman to ever head a major US party’s ticket.

Many American newspapers showed a picture of her husband instead.

Here’s the Chicago Tribune (all front pages via the Newseum):

IL_CT

The Houston Chronicle:

TX_HC

The Arkansas Democrat Gazette!

AR_ADG

Bill Clinton spoke last night, and his speech happened late enough that Hillary Clinton’s later appearance on a video screen might have happened to late for early editions. The Wall Street Journal‘s early front page featured Bill; a later front shows Hillary.

WSJ

How’d Hillary do in DC? The Washington Times featured Bernie Sanders, whom she defeated:

DC_WT

And the Washington Post featured…Bill and Bernie. So what gives? “There was no good photo opportunity,” Post spokesperson Kris Coratti tells Washingtonian. “She was on a live video very late in the evening, making for a poor photograph. Bill Clinton’s speech was the big moment, and another big moment was when Bernie Sanders moved that she be given the nomination by acclamation.  So we carried those two photographs.”

DC_WP

Express featured Hillary.

DC_EXPRESS

As did the Chicago Sun-Times, the other major paper in Hillary Clinton’s hometown:

IL_CST

Here’s a particularly nice-looking front from the Orange County Register, which had a longer lead time than East Coast papers. Bill’s where he should be: Below the nominee.

CA_OCR

More from News