In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court this morning threw out the Defense of Marriage
Act. But what does that mean, practically speaking, for gay and lesbian couples? In
what ways will today’s decision impact their daily lives?
For couples who got married in, and continue to reside in, states that recognize same-sex
marriage, today’s decision puts them on equal footing with opposite-sex couples when
it comes to rights such as social security death benefits, the ability to file joint income
taxes, and pension benefits, says Todd Solomon, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery who specializes in employment law and domestic
partnerships.
A spouse who married and resides in a state recognizing same-sex marriage is now entitled
to pension payments after the death of his or her husband or wife. Similarly, same-sex
spouses are now the automatic beneficiaries of their spouses’ 401(k) plans.
Solomon expects employers in states where same-sex marriage is legal to now be required
to cover same-sex spouses if they offer health coverage for opposite-sex spouses.
And previously, even if an employer offered health-care coverage for gay and lesbian
spouses, employees who took those benefits for their husbands and wives had to pay
hundreds or thousands of dollars in federal taxes on them. This is no longer the case.
But the DOMA ruling does not change the fact that it remains up to individual states
to legalize same-sex marriage. And things get murkier when it comes to employee benefits
for gay and lesbian couples living in states that don’t recognize their marriages.
“Which state’s law matters? The state where [a couple] married or the state where
they live?” says Solomon. “That’s a huge open question for employers going forward.”
Employers in Florida, for example, where same-sex marriages are not legal, could still
argue that they are not required to offer spousal health benefits to gay and lesbian
couples who got married in New York or DC. Solomon predicts a “wave of litigation”
to come from these types of situations.
For gay and lesbian individuals with partners who are foreign nationals, however,
there is no ambiguity surrounding the effect of today’s ruling, says Lavi Soloway, an attorney who helped launch The DOMA Project, a campaign focused on immigration
equality for same-sex couples.
People in this scenario are now free to apply for fiancé visas to bring their partners
to the US to get married. Americans already married to non-citizen same-sex spouses
can now apply for green cards for their partners. Because immigration law is federal,
it doesn’t matter whether the couple lives in a state that recognizes their marriage.
From the time the court handed down the ruling at 10 AM this morning, Soloway has
received hundreds of e-mails from bi-national couples ready to move forward with the
legal process to start their lives together. Says Soloway: “They can now be treated
like all other citizens.”
DOMA Is Dead—Now What?
Attorneys weigh in on what Wednesday’s ruling means for gay and lesbian couples.
In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court this morning threw out the Defense of Marriage
Act. But what does that mean, practically speaking, for gay and lesbian couples? In
what ways will today’s decision impact their daily lives?
For couples who got married in, and continue to reside in, states that recognize same-sex
marriage, today’s decision puts them on equal footing with opposite-sex couples when
it comes to rights such as social security death benefits, the ability to file joint income
taxes, and pension benefits, says
Todd Solomon, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery who specializes in employment law and domestic
partnerships.
A spouse who married and resides in a state recognizing same-sex marriage is now entitled
to pension payments after the death of his or her husband or wife. Similarly, same-sex
spouses are now the automatic beneficiaries of their spouses’ 401(k) plans.
Solomon expects employers in states where same-sex marriage is legal to now be required
to cover same-sex spouses if they offer health coverage for opposite-sex spouses.
And previously, even if an employer offered health-care coverage for gay and lesbian
spouses, employees who took those benefits for their husbands and wives had to pay
hundreds or thousands of dollars in federal taxes on them. This is no longer the case.
But the DOMA ruling does not change the fact that it remains up to individual states
to legalize same-sex marriage. And things get murkier when it comes to employee benefits
for gay and lesbian couples living in states that don’t recognize their marriages.
“Which state’s law matters? The state where [a couple] married or the state where
they live?” says Solomon. “That’s a huge open question for employers going forward.”
Employers in Florida, for example, where same-sex marriages are not legal, could still
argue that they are not required to offer spousal health benefits to gay and lesbian
couples who got married in New York or DC. Solomon predicts a “wave of litigation”
to come from these types of situations.
For gay and lesbian individuals with partners who are foreign nationals, however,
there is no ambiguity surrounding the effect of today’s ruling, says
Lavi Soloway, an attorney who helped launch The DOMA Project, a campaign focused on immigration
equality for same-sex couples.
People in this scenario are now free to apply for fiancé visas to bring their partners
to the US to get married. Americans already married to non-citizen same-sex spouses
can now apply for green cards for their partners. Because immigration law is federal,
it doesn’t matter whether the couple lives in a state that recognizes their marriage.
From the time the court handed down the ruling at 10 AM this morning, Soloway has
received hundreds of e-mails from bi-national couples ready to move forward with the
legal process to start their lives together. Says Soloway: “They can now be treated
like all other citizens.”
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
Trump Travels One Block From White House, Declares DC Crime-Free; Barron Trump Moves to Town; and GOP Begins Siege of Home Rule
The “MAGA Former Dancer” Named to a Top Job at the Kennedy Center Inherits a Troubled Program
Patel Dined at Rao’s After Kirk Shooting, Nonviolent Offenses Led to Most Arrests During Trump’s DC Crackdown, and You Should Try These Gougères
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Fiona Apple Wrote a Song About This Maryland Court-Watching Effort
The Confusing Dispute Over the Future of the Anacostia Playhouse
Protecting Our Drinking Water Keeps Him Up at Night
More from News & Politics
Bondi Irks Conservatives With Plan to Limit “Hate Speech,” DC Council Returns to Office, and Chipotle Wants Some Money Back
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
5 Things to Know About “Severance” Star Tramell Tillman
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Patel Dined at Rao’s After Kirk Shooting, Nonviolent Offenses Led to Most Arrests During Trump’s DC Crackdown, and You Should Try These Gougères
How a DC Area Wetlands Restoration Project Could Help Clean Up the Anacostia River
Pressure Grows on FBI Leadership as Search for Kirk’s Killer Continues, Kennedy Center Fires More Staffers, and Spotted Lanternflies Are Everywhere
What Is Free DC?