In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court this morning threw out the Defense of Marriage
Act. But what does that mean, practically speaking, for gay and lesbian couples? In
what ways will today’s decision impact their daily lives?
For couples who got married in, and continue to reside in, states that recognize same-sex
marriage, today’s decision puts them on equal footing with opposite-sex couples when
it comes to rights such as social security death benefits, the ability to file joint income
taxes, and pension benefits, says Todd Solomon, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery who specializes in employment law and domestic
partnerships.
A spouse who married and resides in a state recognizing same-sex marriage is now entitled
to pension payments after the death of his or her husband or wife. Similarly, same-sex
spouses are now the automatic beneficiaries of their spouses’ 401(k) plans.
Solomon expects employers in states where same-sex marriage is legal to now be required
to cover same-sex spouses if they offer health coverage for opposite-sex spouses.
And previously, even if an employer offered health-care coverage for gay and lesbian
spouses, employees who took those benefits for their husbands and wives had to pay
hundreds or thousands of dollars in federal taxes on them. This is no longer the case.
But the DOMA ruling does not change the fact that it remains up to individual states
to legalize same-sex marriage. And things get murkier when it comes to employee benefits
for gay and lesbian couples living in states that don’t recognize their marriages.
“Which state’s law matters? The state where [a couple] married or the state where
they live?” says Solomon. “That’s a huge open question for employers going forward.”
Employers in Florida, for example, where same-sex marriages are not legal, could still
argue that they are not required to offer spousal health benefits to gay and lesbian
couples who got married in New York or DC. Solomon predicts a “wave of litigation”
to come from these types of situations.
For gay and lesbian individuals with partners who are foreign nationals, however,
there is no ambiguity surrounding the effect of today’s ruling, says Lavi Soloway, an attorney who helped launch The DOMA Project, a campaign focused on immigration
equality for same-sex couples.
People in this scenario are now free to apply for fiancé visas to bring their partners
to the US to get married. Americans already married to non-citizen same-sex spouses
can now apply for green cards for their partners. Because immigration law is federal,
it doesn’t matter whether the couple lives in a state that recognizes their marriage.
From the time the court handed down the ruling at 10 AM this morning, Soloway has
received hundreds of e-mails from bi-national couples ready to move forward with the
legal process to start their lives together. Says Soloway: “They can now be treated
like all other citizens.”
DOMA Is Dead—Now What?
Attorneys weigh in on what Wednesday’s ruling means for gay and lesbian couples.
In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court this morning threw out the Defense of Marriage
Act. But what does that mean, practically speaking, for gay and lesbian couples? In
what ways will today’s decision impact their daily lives?
For couples who got married in, and continue to reside in, states that recognize same-sex
marriage, today’s decision puts them on equal footing with opposite-sex couples when
it comes to rights such as social security death benefits, the ability to file joint income
taxes, and pension benefits, says
Todd Solomon, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery who specializes in employment law and domestic
partnerships.
A spouse who married and resides in a state recognizing same-sex marriage is now entitled
to pension payments after the death of his or her husband or wife. Similarly, same-sex
spouses are now the automatic beneficiaries of their spouses’ 401(k) plans.
Solomon expects employers in states where same-sex marriage is legal to now be required
to cover same-sex spouses if they offer health coverage for opposite-sex spouses.
And previously, even if an employer offered health-care coverage for gay and lesbian
spouses, employees who took those benefits for their husbands and wives had to pay
hundreds or thousands of dollars in federal taxes on them. This is no longer the case.
But the DOMA ruling does not change the fact that it remains up to individual states
to legalize same-sex marriage. And things get murkier when it comes to employee benefits
for gay and lesbian couples living in states that don’t recognize their marriages.
“Which state’s law matters? The state where [a couple] married or the state where
they live?” says Solomon. “That’s a huge open question for employers going forward.”
Employers in Florida, for example, where same-sex marriages are not legal, could still
argue that they are not required to offer spousal health benefits to gay and lesbian
couples who got married in New York or DC. Solomon predicts a “wave of litigation”
to come from these types of situations.
For gay and lesbian individuals with partners who are foreign nationals, however,
there is no ambiguity surrounding the effect of today’s ruling, says
Lavi Soloway, an attorney who helped launch The DOMA Project, a campaign focused on immigration
equality for same-sex couples.
People in this scenario are now free to apply for fiancé visas to bring their partners
to the US to get married. Americans already married to non-citizen same-sex spouses
can now apply for green cards for their partners. Because immigration law is federal,
it doesn’t matter whether the couple lives in a state that recognizes their marriage.
From the time the court handed down the ruling at 10 AM this morning, Soloway has
received hundreds of e-mails from bi-national couples ready to move forward with the
legal process to start their lives together. Says Soloway: “They can now be treated
like all other citizens.”
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People of 2025
Rock Creek Isn’t Safe to Swim In. RFK Jr. Did It Anyway.
Johnson Says Congress Will Fix DC’s Budget Eventually, Pete Hegseth Used Signal More Than We Thought, and Locals Won Pulitzers
Jeanine Pirro: 5 Things to Know About the Fox News Host Trump Picked to Be DC’s Top Prosecutor
Trump Fires Librarian of Congress, Fox News Host to Be Next Top DC Prosecutor, Possibly Rabid Actual Fox Terrorizes Arlington
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
DC Might Be Getting a Watergate Museum
DC-Area Universities Are Offering Trump Classes This Fall
Viral DC-Area Food Truck Flavor Hive Has It in the Bag
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
More from News & Politics
Meet the Duck Whisperer of DC
Rock Creek Isn’t Safe to Swim In. RFK Jr. Did It Anyway.
Humorless Scolds Fret About Trump’s Free Plane From Qatar, RFK Jr. Swam in Rock Creek, and We’ve Got 20 New Restaurants for You to Get Excited About
This Pop-Up Museum Is All About the Teenage Experience
Jeanine Pirro: 5 Things to Know About the Fox News Host Trump Picked to Be DC’s Top Prosecutor
Trump Fires Librarian of Congress, Fox News Host to Be Next Top DC Prosecutor, Possibly Rabid Actual Fox Terrorizes Arlington
9 Embassies to Check Out During the EU Open Houses This Weekend
Trump Yanks Ed Martin’s Nomination