The men of the USS Monitor around its pioneering gun turret in 1862. Photograph courtesy of Library of Congress.
The USS Monitor, the US Navy’s first ironclad, revolutionized ocean warfare, then sank in 1862 off North Carolina. Now it’s involved in a fresh skirmish—between a museum and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Initially the protector of the Monitor’s sea-bottom berth, NOAA finished raising the ship’s remains in 2002 after the wreck was repeatedly disturbed by fishermen and errant depth charges. The agency entrusted the vessel, including its 120-ton revolving turret, to the private Mariners’ Museum in Newport News, Virginia, which built a $31-million Monitor Center. But the center hasn’t drawn visitors as expected and donations have declined, leaving NOAA—a Commerce Department division charged with forecasting weather and managing fisheries—to plug gaps in annual preservation costs of $750,000.
NOAA says that was never part of the plan. The museum counters that the feds still own the ship and suggests that Congress step in. Meanwhile, the standoff may do what the Confederacy couldn’t: finish off the Monitor.
This article appears in the April 2014 issue of Washingtonian.
NOAA, Museum Tussle Over Historic Civil War Vessel
Neither wants to pay to preserve a ship that apparently no one wants to see.
The USS Monitor, the US Navy’s first ironclad, revolutionized ocean warfare, then sank in 1862 off North Carolina. Now it’s involved in a fresh skirmish—between a museum and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Initially the protector of the Monitor’s sea-bottom berth, NOAA finished raising the ship’s remains in 2002 after the wreck was repeatedly disturbed by fishermen and errant depth charges. The agency entrusted the vessel, including its 120-ton revolving turret, to the private Mariners’ Museum in Newport News, Virginia, which built a $31-million Monitor Center. But the center hasn’t drawn visitors as expected and donations have declined, leaving NOAA—a Commerce Department division charged with forecasting weather and managing fisheries—to plug gaps in annual preservation costs of $750,000.
NOAA says that was never part of the plan. The museum counters that the feds still own the ship and suggests that Congress step in. Meanwhile, the standoff may do what the Confederacy couldn’t: finish off the Monitor.
This article appears in the April 2014 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Shutdown Is About to Get Really Bad, Shootings Plagued DC Over the Weekend, and a Furloughed Fed Flogs Frankfurters
Some DC Residents Are Actually Leaving the Country
A Bizarre Taco Bell-Fueled Ultramarathon Is Coming to DC
Can Jay Jones Still Win?
Most Powerful Women in Washington 2025
Washingtonian Magazine
November Issue: Top Doctors
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
This Unusual Virginia Business Offers Shooting and Yoga
Why Is Studio Theatre’s David Muse Stepping Down?
Want to Live in a DC Firehouse?
DC Punk Explored in Three New History Books
More from News & Politics
White House Says It Posts “Banger Memes,” National Guard Troops Will Stand Around in DC Until February, Police Say Naked Man Terrorized Area Walmart Customers
Photos: Thousands Turn Out for DC’s Annual High Heel Race
Sandwich Guy Skeletons Are This Halloween’s Must-Have Decoration in DC
Judge Blocks Shutdown Layoffs, Border Patrol Urged to Stop Tear-Gassing Children, Post Editorial Board Keeps Forgetting to Mention Owner’s Economic Interests
Meet Adelita Grijalva, the Arizona Congresswoman-Elect Who Can’t Take Her Seat
Federal Food Aid Is About to Run Out, Trump Wants to Know What Happened to Jimmy Hoffa, and Albert Pike’s Statue Is Back in DC
Some DC Residents Are Actually Leaving the Country
A Bizarre Taco Bell-Fueled Ultramarathon Is Coming to DC