In recent days, it's become increasingly difficult to figure out what you can say, and who you can say it to, and what you can do and still keep your job if you work for the Washington Post. Based on what the Post has published, or allowed, over the last several years, here are five handy guidelines for Post writers, or wannabe-Post writers to stick in their wallets or next to their keyboards.
1. You may on one (1) occasion, refer to the former First Lady of the United States and the current Secretary of State as a bitch as long as the reference is a) indirect and b) meant to be humorous, no matter the actual success of the joke.
2. You may take payments from a company you write about without disclosing said payments as long as you have reached a position of significant stature within the Washington Post. Writers who are uncertain of their stature should check with their editors before entering into financial relationships with magnates at risk of being hauled before the Securities and Exchange Committee.
3. Stay far way from event-based efforts to generate revenue for the Post. It's the marketing staff who will get the ax, of course, when such efforts go wrong, but it's best not to be associated with the resulting bad publicity. Your stature is always at greater risk than the company's executives, who can survive being involved in discussions about such events as long as they don't approve the specific language of the invitations.
4. Avoid, even in private correspondence, using slangy language employed by the people you cover. All conversations should be presented in inverted-pyramid form to avoid confusion about your role as a reporter.
5. If you make the mistake of thinking everyone cares about your family problems and write a hopelessly tacky piece about them, you will lose your column. That lapse in judgment in no way disqualifies you from running a major online initiative for the Post, of course.
A Writer’s Guide to Employment at the Washington Post
Struggling to figure out what you can say and still work for the Washington Post? Here are some handy tips.
In recent days, it's become increasingly difficult to figure out what you can say, and who you can say it to, and what you can do and still keep your job if you work for the Washington Post. Based on what the Post has published, or allowed, over the last several years, here are five handy guidelines for Post writers, or wannabe-Post writers to stick in their wallets or next to their keyboards.
1. You may on one (1) occasion, refer to the former First Lady of the United States and the current Secretary of State as a bitch as long as the reference is a) indirect and b) meant to be humorous, no matter the actual success of the joke.
2. You may take payments from a company you write about without disclosing said payments as long as you have reached a position of significant stature within the Washington Post. Writers who are uncertain of their stature should check with their editors before entering into financial relationships with magnates at risk of being hauled before the Securities and Exchange Committee.
3. Stay far way from event-based efforts to generate revenue for the Post. It's the marketing staff who will get the ax, of course, when such efforts go wrong, but it's best not to be associated with the resulting bad publicity. Your stature is always at greater risk than the company's executives, who can survive being involved in discussions about such events as long as they don't approve the specific language of the invitations.
4. Avoid, even in private correspondence, using slangy language employed by the people you cover. All conversations should be presented in inverted-pyramid form to avoid confusion about your role as a reporter.
5. If you make the mistake of thinking everyone cares about your family problems and write a hopelessly tacky piece about them, you will lose your column. That lapse in judgment in no way disqualifies you from running a major online initiative for the Post, of course.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
Organizers Say More Than 100,000 Expected for DC’s No Kings Protest Saturday
Cheryl Hines Suddenly Has a Lot to Say About RFK Jr. and MAGA
Most Powerful Women in Washington 2025
Some Feds Are Driving for Uber as Shutdown Grinds On, Congressman Claims Swastika Was Impossible to See on Flag, and Ikea Will Leave Pentagon City
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People of 2025
Washingtonian Magazine
October Issue: Most Powerful Women
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Is Studio Theatre’s David Muse Stepping Down?
Want to Live in a DC Firehouse?
DC Punk Explored in Three New History Books
The Local Group Fighting to Keep Virginia’s Space Shuttle
More from News & Politics
Trump Obliterates East Wing, No End to Shutdown Likely, and Car Smashes Into White House Gate (But Don’t Worry, the Building Wasn’t Damaged)
Trump’s Wrecking Ballroom, Senate Cools on Nominee Who Said He Has a “Nazi Streak,” and We Tried the Proposed Potomac Electric “Flying” Ferry
Inside Chinatown’s Last Chinese Businesses
Inside DC’s Gray Resistance
“I’m Back!!!”: George Santos Returns to Cameo
PHOTOS: No Kings DC Protest—the Signs, the Costumes, the Crowd
Federal Courts Run Out of Money as Shutdown Continues, No Kings Protests Draw Millions, Arlington GOP Event Descends Into Chaos
Why Is Studio Theatre’s David Muse Stepping Down?