A dispute between the owner of an alleged puppy mill and animal advocates and concerned
neighbors in Fauquier County is intensifying. Irina Barrett, who runs Canis Maximus Kennel, is suing the Middleburg Humane Foundation and the
Fauquier County humane inspector for defamation, as reported by Fauquier Now News.
The lawsuit comes in the wake of heated hearings before the local zoning board where
Barrett has been trying—in the face of widespread community opposition—to get approval
to house her dogs. She has operated without a business license for the past three
and a half years.
In the suit, filed in federal court this month in Alexandria, Barrett, who breeds
Doberman Pinschers and Great Danes, claims that Fauquier County humane inspector Hilleary Bogley spread lies about her business in a report distributed throughout the area.
Bogley made a series of visits to Barrett’s kennel earlier this year, after she says
she received an anonymous tip about inhumane conditions there. Among the observations
Bogley documented: pens soaked in urine; dogs without access to water, heat, and ventilation;
underweight and fearful dogs; and overall conditions that qualified Canis Maximus
as a puppy mill.
Ultimately, Barrett agreed to surrender 12 of her dogs to be adopted through the Middleburg
Humane Foundation. In her report, Bogley noted that the surrendered dogs had many
health problems, including eye and ear infections, pneumonia, sores, and worms. In
her complaint against Bogley, Barrett doesn’t deny the dogs were ill; rather, she
says “many, if not all” of the problems are not unusual, and that she purposefully
turned over dogs “most in need of veterinary support.”
The lawsuit doesn’t end with Barrett’s assertion that Bogley’s report defamed her.
She also takes issue with the fact that Bogley runs the Middleburg Humane Foundation,
in addition to her job as a humane inspector. She alleges that Bogley stood to benefit
financially from taking her dogs, since they were then adopted out by the Humane Foundation,
which charges adoption fees.
“It seems to be a direct conflict of interest,” said Barrett’s lawyer, Andrew Bodoh, to The Washingtonian. “The Middleburg Humane Foundation may not be a direct competitor [of Bogley], but
they’re in the same business of placing dogs with families.”
But like most animal shelters, the Middleburg Humane Foundation is a nonprofit—not
a commercial business—and says it charges adoption fees only to cover medical costs.
According to its website, the $125 fee
to adopt a dog helps cover expenses such as spay or neuter surgery and vaccinations.
By comparison, Barrett’s Canis Maximus website says she sells her dogs for $1,500 to $2,500.
Asked how the Humane Foundation’s $125 adoption fees could be considered a profit,
Bodoh said: “We don’t know all of the specifics at this point. That’s going to be
part of discovery.”
Bogley has yet to respond in court filings to the lawsuit. We left a message for her,
and will update this post if she returns the call.
Suspected Virginia Puppy Mill Claims Defamation
A Fauquier County dog breeder is suing the humane inspector who says she uncovered puppy mill conditions.
A dispute between the owner of an alleged puppy mill and animal advocates and concerned
neighbors in Fauquier County is intensifying.
Irina Barrett, who runs Canis Maximus Kennel, is suing the Middleburg Humane Foundation and the
Fauquier County humane inspector for defamation, as reported by
Fauquier Now News.
The lawsuit comes in the wake of heated hearings before the local zoning board where
Barrett has been trying—in the face of widespread community opposition—to get approval
to house her dogs. She has operated without a business license for the past three
and a half years.
In the suit, filed in federal court this month in Alexandria, Barrett, who breeds
Doberman Pinschers and Great Danes, claims that Fauquier County humane inspector
Hilleary Bogley spread lies about her business in a report distributed throughout the area.
Bogley made a series of visits to Barrett’s kennel earlier this year, after she says
she received an anonymous tip about inhumane conditions there. Among the observations
Bogley documented: pens soaked in urine; dogs without access to water, heat, and ventilation;
underweight and fearful dogs; and overall conditions that qualified Canis Maximus
as a puppy mill.
Ultimately, Barrett agreed to surrender 12 of her dogs to be adopted through the Middleburg
Humane Foundation. In her report, Bogley noted that the surrendered dogs had many
health problems, including eye and ear infections, pneumonia, sores, and worms. In
her complaint against Bogley, Barrett doesn’t deny the dogs were ill; rather, she
says “many, if not all” of the problems are not unusual, and that she purposefully
turned over dogs “most in need of veterinary support.”
The lawsuit doesn’t end with Barrett’s assertion that Bogley’s report defamed her.
She also takes issue with the fact that Bogley runs the Middleburg Humane Foundation,
in addition to her job as a humane inspector. She alleges that Bogley stood to benefit
financially from taking her dogs, since they were then adopted out by the Humane Foundation,
which charges adoption fees.
“It seems to be a direct conflict of interest,” said Barrett’s lawyer,
Andrew Bodoh, to
The Washingtonian. “The Middleburg Humane Foundation may not be a direct competitor [of Bogley], but
they’re in the same business of placing dogs with families.”
But like most animal shelters, the Middleburg Humane Foundation is a nonprofit—not
a commercial business—and says it charges adoption fees only to cover medical costs.
According to its website, the $125 fee
to adopt a dog helps cover expenses such as spay or neuter surgery and vaccinations.
By comparison, Barrett’s Canis Maximus website says she sells her dogs for $1,500 to $2,500.
Asked how the Humane Foundation’s $125 adoption fees could be considered a profit,
Bodoh said: “We don’t know all of the specifics at this point. That’s going to be
part of discovery.”
Bogley has yet to respond in court filings to the lawsuit. We left a message for her,
and will update this post if she returns the call.
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Missing Men of Mount Pleasant
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This July
The Washington Nationals Just Fired the Manager and GM Who Led Them to a Championship. Why Has the Team Been so Bad Since?
FBI Building Now on Track to Leave DC After All, Whistleblower Leaks Texts Suggesting Justice Department Planned to Blow Off Federal Court Orders, and NPS Cuts Leave Assateague Island Without Lifeguards
Families of DC Air Disaster Victims Criticize Army’s Response, Trump Settles His Scores Via Tariff, and Police Dog Kicked at Dulles Returns to Work
This DC-Area Lawyer Wants More Americans Betting on Elections
Trump Threatens DC Takeover, Says He’d Run the City “So Good”; Supreme Court OKs Mass Federal Worker Layoffs; and You Should Go Pick Some Sunflowers
Trump Pledges Support for RFK Stadium Plan, Ben’s Chili Bowl Will Strand Us Half-Smokeless for Months, and Pediatricians Are Suing RFK Jr.
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor