Parker got 11,000 pieces of hate mail after one Palin column. Photograph by Chris Leaman.
The Post’s Ladies Who Lash Out have lambasted Sarah Palin.
“Note to soon-to-be-former Gov. Sarah Palin: Big girls don’t quit,” Ruth Marcus wrote after Palin announced she was stepping down as governor of Alaska.
Anne Applebaum weighed in: “She smugly asserts the right to decide who is a patriot and who is not. It’s not about ‘country,’ in other words, it’s about hypocrisy. And Sarah Palin is full of it.”
Kathleen Parker, the Post’s conservative female pundit, wrote: “Meanwhile, getting real, can we stop pretending that Palin is interested in anything other than her own ambition?”
Parker penned a column poking at Palin on September 26, Parker’s birthday. “For a present I got 11,000 hate e-mails,” Parker says. “They transcended anything I’ve experienced in 22 years as a columnist. Ones like ‘You should have been aborted and left in a dump.’ ”
The only one of the Post’s formidable female writers who didn’t shred Palin was fashion critic Robin Givhan.She took aim at South Carolina governor Mark Sanford, who “spent nearly a fortnight describing his affair with an Argentine woman in the kind of overwrought and salacious terms of a Harlequin bodice-ripper.” Givhan then assessed Jenny Sanford’s beachwear: “The wife has responded with calibrated contempt for his behavior, a grudging offer of Christian forgiveness, and the relaxed wardrobe of a regular at Canyon Ranch.”
The Post might be in turmoil over how to make money and combine print and online operations, but it has assembled a fearless group of female columnists. For years, women criticized the Post’s lack of female voices; now it has a choir. Sally Quinn, blasting Palin in her On Faith blog, makes a Fab Five.
“Many right-wing Christians don’t believe women should work outside the home,” Quinn wrote. “Yet here was Sarah Palin, resigning as the governor of Alaska, for political reasons. This is not putting your family first. We should not be surprised.”
Marcus was particularly vicious toward Palin. She tells Post Watch: “Her behavior has not promoted the cause of taking women seriously in politics.”
Marcus describes herself as a feminist, though she doesn’t write from that perspective all the time. “I would be more bored writing it than people reading it,” she says.
Parker is a relatively new voice. Syndicated since 1995, she joined the Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. “When I write an op-ed for the Post, people pay more attention,” she says. “It’s a very engaged readership. I used to feel they were more intelligent, but after some of the e-mails I received, I’m not so sure.”
The attacks on Palin didn’t go unnoticed by her defenders. Fox’s Greta Van Susteren called Quinn “delusional” and her On Faith essay “the most incredible personal attack for no value.”
No value? The Ladies Who Lash Out are creating buzz and controversy in print and beyond.
This article first appeared in the August 2009 issue of The Washingtonian. For more articles from that issue, click here.
Post Watch: Fearless Ladies, Point Your Pens
The Post’s Ladies Who Lash Out have lambasted Sarah Palin.
“Note to soon-to-be-former Gov. Sarah Palin: Big girls don’t quit,” Ruth Marcus wrote after Palin announced she was stepping down as governor of Alaska.
Anne Applebaum weighed in: “She smugly asserts the right to decide who is a patriot and who is not. It’s not about ‘country,’ in other words, it’s about hypocrisy. And Sarah Palin is full of it.”
Kathleen Parker, the Post’s conservative female pundit, wrote: “Meanwhile, getting real, can we stop pretending that Palin is interested in anything other than her own ambition?”
Parker penned a column poking at Palin on September 26, Parker’s birthday. “For a present I got 11,000 hate e-mails,” Parker says. “They transcended anything I’ve experienced in 22 years as a columnist. Ones like ‘You should have been aborted and left in a dump.’ ”
The only one of the Post’s formidable female writers who didn’t shred Palin was fashion critic Robin Givhan.She took aim at South Carolina governor Mark Sanford, who “spent nearly a fortnight describing his affair with an Argentine woman in the kind of overwrought and salacious terms of a Harlequin bodice-ripper.” Givhan then assessed Jenny Sanford’s beachwear: “The wife has responded with calibrated contempt for his behavior, a grudging offer of Christian forgiveness, and the relaxed wardrobe of a regular at Canyon Ranch.”
The Post might be in turmoil over how to make money and combine print and online operations, but it has assembled a fearless group of female columnists. For years, women criticized the Post’s lack of female voices; now it has a choir. Sally Quinn, blasting Palin in her On Faith blog, makes a Fab Five.
“Many right-wing Christians don’t believe women should work outside the home,” Quinn wrote. “Yet here was Sarah Palin, resigning as the governor of Alaska, for political reasons. This is not putting your family first. We should not be surprised.”
Marcus was particularly vicious toward Palin. She tells Post Watch: “Her behavior has not promoted the cause of taking women seriously in politics.”
Marcus describes herself as a feminist, though she doesn’t write from that perspective all the time. “I would be more bored writing it than people reading it,” she says.
Parker is a relatively new voice. Syndicated since 1995, she joined the Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. “When I write an op-ed for the Post, people pay more attention,” she says. “It’s a very engaged readership. I used to feel they were more intelligent, but after some of the e-mails I received, I’m not so sure.”
The attacks on Palin didn’t go unnoticed by her defenders. Fox’s Greta Van Susteren called Quinn “delusional” and her On Faith essay “the most incredible personal attack for no value.”
No value? The Ladies Who Lash Out are creating buzz and controversy in print and beyond.
This article first appeared in the August 2009 issue of The Washingtonian. For more articles from that issue, click here.
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Missing Men of Mount Pleasant
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
Trump Threatens DC Takeover, Says He’d Run the City “So Good”; Supreme Court OKs Mass Federal Worker Layoffs; and You Should Go Pick Some Sunflowers
Trump Pledges Support for RFK Stadium Plan, Ben’s Chili Bowl Will Strand Us Half-Smokeless for Months, and Pediatricians Are Suing RFK Jr.
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor
Elon Musk Starts What Is Likely the First Party of His Life, Nationals Fire Longtime Management Team, and Washingtonians Got Carried Away With the Fireworks
Speaker Johnson’s Megabill Prayers Likely to Be Answered Before Holiday Weekend, Wrongly Deported Maryland Man Faced Abuse in El Salvador Prison, and We Found Some Yummy Nepalese Food
Pardoned J6er Will Join Ed Martin’s Justice Department Office, Trump Outlines Hypothetical Alligator Escape Plan, and We Have Fireworks Show Recommendations
The “World’s Largest Outdoor Museum” Is Coming to DC. Here’s a Preview.
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut