While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’sBruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Chinese Spies May Have Tried to Impersonate Journalist Bruce Stokes
Virus-bearing messages were sent in his name from a fake account.
While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’s Bruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Don’t Miss Another Big Story—Get Our Weekend Newsletter
Our most popular stories of the week, sent every Saturday.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Trump Hotel Employees Reveal What It Was Really Like Catering to the Right Wing Elite
The Bulwark Was Founded to Oppose Trump. Now What?
Washington’s Most Influential People
American Idol Is Facing Backlash Over Claudia Conway’s Audition
March 4 Isn’t the Only Date on the QAnon Calendar
Washingtonian Magazine
March 2021: The Influencers
View IssueSubscribe
Get Us on Social
Get Us on Social
Related
Washingtonian’s Most-Read Posts of 2020
Video From Fall Real Estate Market Update With Local Leaders
Washingtonian Real Estate Virtual Happy Hour
Videos from Washingtonian’s Wellness Day
More from News & Politics
The Week Covid Changed Washington
A New DC Program Lets Housebound Seniors Sign Up for Zoom Sessions with Rescue Animals
Axios Political Reporter Alexi McCammond is Teen Vogue’s New Editor
Report Claims NFL Investigation Recommends Dan Snyder Be Forced to Sell
Today’s Vaccine Signup Was Messy Again. Next Week Doesn’t Look Promising.
A DC Experiment in Direct Cash Transfers to Fight Poverty
The Capitol Police’s Request to Retain the National Guard Took DC Officials by Surprise
DC’s Covid Vaccine Appointments Were Filled in Under 10 Minutes This Morning