While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’sBruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Chinese Spies May Have Tried to Impersonate Journalist Bruce Stokes
Virus-bearing messages were sent in his name from a fake account.
While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’s Bruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
A Historic DC Black Church Now Owns the Proud Boys’ Name
OPM’s New Email System Prompts Lawsuit
Trump’s Attempts to Shrink the Federal Workforce Could Hit the DC Area’s Economy Hard
In the Event of a US Invasion, Canadians Really Like Their Chances
What’s Going On With These Allegedly Stranded Astronauts?
Washingtonian Magazine
February Issue: 100 Very Best Restaurants
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These DC Food Activists Were Behind the Ranked-Choice-Voting Initiative
A Biography of Perle Mesta Sheds Light on a Famed DC Figure
Inside the Library of Congress’s Artificial-Aging Lab
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This January
More from News & Politics
Norm Eisen Talks About How He Just Beat DOGE in Court—for Now
Did You See a Green Rectangle on the Potomac Early This Morning? Here’s Why.
DOGE Guy Loses Job Over Racist Posts, Buyout Deadline Paused, and Why You Should Pay Attention to Chris Hayes
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This February
DC-Area Congressional Offices Say They’re Getting Flooded With Phone Calls About Trump
Chris Hayes Knows Why Tech Makes Us Feel Bad
UDC’s President Wants You to Think Differently About the City’s Public University
Spoons Are Becoming a Symbol of Feds’ Resistance to Trump and Musk