Kudos to DC street cops and detectives for shutting down drug networks, curbing gangs,
gaining the trust of the community, and getting guns off the streets—all of which
contribute to lowering the District’s homicide rate. No doubt demographics helped
lower the number to 88, the lowest since 1961. Poor people have been moved out and
are moving out of the city.
Credit goes up the chain of command to police chief Cathy Lanier and even to Mayor Vince Gray, for supporting cops. Notably, no teenagers under the age of 18 were killed.
But when Lanier and Gray hyped the 2012 homicide number, they also took credit for
an 82 percent closure rate. Sounds as if 64 murder cases were solved, the killers
taken off the street, the victims’ families allowed to grieve with some closure.
But that’s not what “closure” means to the Metropolitan Police Department.
DC police follow the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program, which allows it to call
a case closed if an arrest is made. A case can also be “closed” if someone charged
with murder cannot be prosecuted because they are dead or being prosecuted elsewhere.
Police also lump cases closed in past years into its 2012 statistics. If police arrested
someone last year for a murder committed in 2010, for example, it accrues to the 2012
closure rate.
The MPD does not reopen cases if the people they arrest are not prosecuted and wind
up back on the street. For example, federal prosecutors indicted two people charged
with murder but later dismissed the cases. Would these cases be “unclosed?”
For a more accurate measure of how well the criminal justice system performs at taking
murderers off the streets, it’s best to check the conviction numbers with the US Attorney,
whose prosecutors try murders.
Most telling: Almost all of the cases involving murders from 2012 remain pending,
according to the US Attorney’s office. Defendants might have been arrested, but they
have neither pleaded guilty nor had their cases come to trial. For prosecutors, none
of these cases are closed.
Here’s what we know with the latest numbers from federal prosecutors:
• As of November 7, prosecutors had obtained 73 homicide convictions, which translates
to a nearly 90 percent conviction rate. Pretty good. Keep in mind, most of these murders
were committed before 2012. And prosecutors only bring cases to trial they expect
to win.
• Of those convictions, 37 came from guilty pleas. Prosecutors brought cases against
43 defendants for homicide, but they got only 36 convictions. That means seven alleged
murderers got off. Again—are they “unclosed”?
True, the MPD is following official guidelines in reporting its closure rate, but
it would be more accurate and transparent—dare I say honest—to report arrests with
the year of the alleged homicide, cases closed for “exceptional” reasons, and actual
convictions. Police should also be honest about cases in which they arrest an alleged
defendant but prosecutors fail to get a plea or conviction.
2012’s Record Low Number of Homicides Isn’t Telling the Whole Story
The 82 percent closure rate of cases is not necessarily accurate.
Kudos to DC street cops and detectives for shutting down drug networks, curbing gangs,
gaining the trust of the community, and getting guns off the streets—all of which
contribute to lowering the District’s homicide rate. No doubt demographics helped
lower the number to 88, the lowest since 1961. Poor people have been moved out and
are moving out of the city.
Credit goes up the chain of command to police chief
Cathy Lanier and even to Mayor
Vince Gray, for supporting cops. Notably, no teenagers under the age of 18 were killed.
But when Lanier and Gray hyped the 2012 homicide number, they also took credit for
an 82 percent closure rate. Sounds as if 64 murder cases were solved, the killers
taken off the street, the victims’ families allowed to grieve with some closure.
But that’s not what “closure” means to the Metropolitan Police Department.
DC police follow the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program, which allows it to call
a case closed if an arrest is made. A case can also be “closed” if someone charged
with murder cannot be prosecuted because they are dead or being prosecuted elsewhere.
Police also lump cases closed in past years into its 2012 statistics. If police arrested
someone last year for a murder committed in 2010, for example, it accrues to the 2012
closure rate.
The MPD does not reopen cases if the people they arrest are not prosecuted and wind
up back on the street. For example, federal prosecutors indicted two people charged
with murder but later dismissed the cases. Would these cases be “unclosed?”
For a more accurate measure of how well the criminal justice system performs at taking
murderers off the streets, it’s best to check the conviction numbers with the US Attorney,
whose prosecutors try murders.
Most telling: Almost all of the cases involving murders from 2012 remain pending,
according to the US Attorney’s office. Defendants might have been arrested, but they
have neither pleaded guilty nor had their cases come to trial. For prosecutors, none
of these cases are closed.
Here’s what we know with the latest numbers from federal prosecutors:
• As of November 7, prosecutors had obtained 73 homicide convictions, which translates
to a nearly 90 percent conviction rate. Pretty good. Keep in mind, most of these murders
were committed before 2012. And prosecutors only bring cases to trial they expect
to win.
• Of those convictions, 37 came from guilty pleas. Prosecutors brought cases against
43 defendants for homicide, but they got only 36 convictions. That means seven alleged
murderers got off. Again—are they “unclosed”?
True, the MPD is following official guidelines in reporting its closure rate, but
it would be more accurate and transparent—dare I say honest—to report arrests with
the year of the alleged homicide, cases closed for “exceptional” reasons, and actual
convictions. Police should also be honest about cases in which they arrest an alleged
defendant but prosecutors fail to get a plea or conviction.
But that might be too much to ask.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
Trump Travels One Block From White House, Declares DC Crime-Free; Barron Trump Moves to Town; and GOP Begins Siege of Home Rule
The “MAGA Former Dancer” Named to a Top Job at the Kennedy Center Inherits a Troubled Program
Patel Dined at Rao’s After Kirk Shooting, Nonviolent Offenses Led to Most Arrests During Trump’s DC Crackdown, and You Should Try These Gougères
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Fiona Apple Wrote a Song About This Maryland Court-Watching Effort
The Confusing Dispute Over the Future of the Anacostia Playhouse
Protecting Our Drinking Water Keeps Him Up at Night
More from News & Politics
Bondi Irks Conservatives With Plan to Limit “Hate Speech,” DC Council Returns to Office, and Chipotle Wants Some Money Back
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
5 Things to Know About “Severance” Star Tramell Tillman
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Patel Dined at Rao’s After Kirk Shooting, Nonviolent Offenses Led to Most Arrests During Trump’s DC Crackdown, and You Should Try These Gougères
How a DC Area Wetlands Restoration Project Could Help Clean Up the Anacostia River
Pressure Grows on FBI Leadership as Search for Kirk’s Killer Continues, Kennedy Center Fires More Staffers, and Spotted Lanternflies Are Everywhere
What Is Free DC?