The sale of the
Washington Post to
Jeff Bezos Monday left us guessing about the fate of the fabled newspaper, but Wall Street’s
reaction was swift. In after hours trading Monday, the day news of the impending deal broke, the Washington Post Company’s stock gained 29 points, from $568 at the close of the bell to $597, according to MarketWatch. First thing Tuesday, investors snapped up shares and sent the share price over $600.
The sale of the newspaper division was a smart business decision, plain and simple.
No doubt the
Washington Post, and journalism in general, thrived under the Graham family’s stewardship for the
past 80 years. How many journalists got into the game because of Woodward and Bernstein,
brought to you by the
Washington Post? The
Post helped establish investigative journalism. We all wanted to defrock a president—or
a mayor, at least.
Kay Graham, in her quiet and reserved way, broke barriers for women in business and publishing.
On its worst days, the
Post still published great journalism.
But the storied newspaper could not withstand the disruptions brought on by the digital
era. Like many other daily print publications, its business model quit working. Starting
a decade ago, it began losing readers and revenues. Over the past six years it saw
a 44 percent decline in operating revenue, according to the
Post article announcing the sale. The Post Company’s newspaper division posted an operating
loss of nearly $50 million over the first six months of 2013. Online revenue rose
15 percent, but that barely offset the losses.
When the Post Company roped off its daily newspapers into a separate News division
not long ago, it became one of five distinct divisions that included Education, Broadcasting,
Cable, and “Other Businesses, Ventures, and Investments.” Reporters wondered at the
time if the reorganization would set the stage for the Grahams to sell the newspaper
and keep its profitable divisions.
That’s precisely what the Bezos deal described.
The Post Company kept its Kaplan education division, which could soon return to being
profitable. The money-making broadcasting and cable divisions are not going to Bezos.
The Post Company kept its valuable real estate holdings in downtown Washington, DC,
and in the Robinson Terminal, along the Alexandria waterfront.
In jettisoning the news division, the Grahams cut their losses. The company will have
to change its name, but without the news division’s drag, it’s likely to see growth
in its stock value, judging from Wall Street’s immediate reaction to the Bezos news. Keep in mind Post Company stock was selling for $26 a share when Kay Graham took it public in 1971.
Selling the iconic newspaper might wind up being bad for journalism—or Bezos might
figure out a way to make money and good journalism at the same time. Either way, the
deal is very good for the Grahams, who control the company and its stock, worth many
billions of dollars.
See also:
“Washington Post” Reporters React to Sale
More Bad News About the “Washington Post’s” Profits
Where the “Washington Post” Headquarters Could Move
The Sale of the “Washington Post”: A Smart Decision for the Graham Family
The sale of the
Washington Post to
Jeff Bezos Monday left us guessing about the fate of the fabled newspaper, but Wall Street’s
reaction was swift. In after hours trading Monday, the day news of the impending deal broke, the Washington Post Company’s stock gained 29 points, from $568 at the close of the bell to $597, according to MarketWatch. First thing Tuesday, investors snapped up shares and sent the share price over $600.
The sale of the newspaper division was a smart business decision, plain and simple.
No doubt the
Washington Post, and journalism in general, thrived under the Graham family’s stewardship for the
past 80 years. How many journalists got into the game because of Woodward and Bernstein,
brought to you by the
Washington Post? The
Post helped establish investigative journalism. We all wanted to defrock a president—or
a mayor, at least.
Kay Graham, in her quiet and reserved way, broke barriers for women in business and publishing.
On its worst days, the
Post still published great journalism.
But the storied newspaper could not withstand the disruptions brought on by the digital
era. Like many other daily print publications, its business model quit working. Starting
a decade ago, it began losing readers and revenues. Over the past six years it saw
a 44 percent decline in operating revenue, according to the
Post article announcing the sale. The Post Company’s newspaper division posted an operating
loss of nearly $50 million over the first six months of 2013. Online revenue rose
15 percent, but that barely offset the losses.
When the Post Company roped off its daily newspapers into a separate News division
not long ago, it became one of five distinct divisions that included Education, Broadcasting,
Cable, and “Other Businesses, Ventures, and Investments.” Reporters wondered at the
time if the reorganization would set the stage for the Grahams to sell the newspaper
and keep its profitable divisions.
That’s precisely what the Bezos deal described.
The Post Company kept its Kaplan education division, which could soon return to being
profitable. The money-making broadcasting and cable divisions are not going to Bezos.
The Post Company kept its valuable real estate holdings in downtown Washington, DC,
and in the Robinson Terminal, along the Alexandria waterfront.
In jettisoning the news division, the Grahams cut their losses. The company will have
to change its name, but without the news division’s drag, it’s likely to see growth
in its stock value, judging from Wall Street’s immediate reaction to the Bezos news. Keep in mind Post Company stock was selling for $26 a share when Kay Graham took it public in 1971.
Selling the iconic newspaper might wind up being bad for journalism—or Bezos might
figure out a way to make money and good journalism at the same time. Either way, the
deal is very good for the Grahams, who control the company and its stock, worth many
billions of dollars.
See also:
“Washington Post” Reporters React to Sale
More Bad News About the “Washington Post’s” Profits
Where the “Washington Post” Headquarters Could Move
Must-Reads
Take Our Restaurant Survey and You Could Win Dinner at a Mike Isabella Restaurant
10 Fall Festivals Near DC That You Don’t Want to Miss
Washingtonian’s Great Places to Work Application
DC is Getting an All-Male Burlesque Brunch
September 2016: How to Dress in DC
More from News & Politics
Photos and Scenes From the African American History Museum’s Opening Day
How History Museums Around the US Have Presented the African American Experience
Frederick Could Be an Urban Suburb of DC–Unless Its Good Ol’ Boy Past Gets in Its Way
Road Closures, Traffic Detours, and Security Information for the African American History Museum Opening
FDR Defended His Dog During a Campaign Speech in DC
DC’s Most Popular Baby Names Over the Years
How One Writer Told the Story of the New African American History Museum
The National Archives Just Released These GIFs of Old-Time DC—and They’re Awesome
Most Popular
The Best Cheap Restaurants in Washington, DC
100 Very Best Restaurants
9 New Restaurants to Try Now
How One Couple Transformed a Virginia Estate into the Ultimate Southern Lawn Party Wedding
I Was at the Montgomery Mall During the Shooting. This Is What It Was Like Inside.