The DC government yesterday started a long-overdue review of public school boundaries that is all but guaranteed to stir controversy among parents who choose homes based on what schools their kids could be sent to.
For the first time in more than 30 years, the District is reconsidering its school boundaries and feeder patterns, the geographic lines that determine which students attend specific schools. Population centers have shifted, public schools have closed and opened, and a network of charters schools has sprouted up since the last time DC redrew its education map. But already, news of the review committee’s mere existence is sending many parents into a tizzy.
On the online forum DC Urban Moms and Dads, some parents in Crestwood, a leafy enclave of upper Northwest on the eastern side of Rock Creek Park, are worried their kids will be cut out from attending Wilson High School in Tenleytown or the middle schools such as Deal or Oyster-Adams that feed into it. “I won’t buy in the Shepherd Park, or Crestwood neighborhoods right now,” one parent writes.
Deputy Mayor for Education Abigail Smith, who is leading the boundary review committee, says there will be “grandfathering provisions” to soften the impact on families when the boundary changes take effect in the 2015-16 school year. But that, too, is being met with skepticism, especially from parents who depend on lotteries to get their children into schools that are in different parts of the city.
“They want to make sure out-of-bounds kids think they will be grandfathered in while actually leaving open the option to boot them,” another DC Urban Moms user writes.
The 20-person committee will release its first recommendations in May 2014, a month after the Democratic mayoral primary. The scheduling muffles the potential political impact on Mayor Vince Gray if he decides to run for a second term.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
DC to Review Public School Boundaries
The city plans to redraw the maps that determine where kids go to school.
The DC government yesterday started a long-overdue review of public school boundaries that is all but guaranteed to stir controversy among parents who choose homes based on what schools their kids could be sent to.
For the first time in more than 30 years, the District is reconsidering its school boundaries and feeder patterns, the geographic lines that determine which students attend specific schools. Population centers have shifted, public schools have closed and opened, and a network of charters schools has sprouted up since the last time DC redrew its education map. But already, news of the review committee’s mere existence is sending many parents into a tizzy.
On the online forum DC Urban Moms and Dads, some parents in Crestwood, a leafy enclave of upper Northwest on the eastern side of Rock Creek Park, are worried their kids will be cut out from attending Wilson High School in Tenleytown or the middle schools such as Deal or Oyster-Adams that feed into it. “I won’t buy in the Shepherd Park, or Crestwood neighborhoods right now,” one parent writes.
Deputy Mayor for Education Abigail Smith, who is leading the boundary review committee, says there will be “grandfathering provisions” to soften the impact on families when the boundary changes take effect in the 2015-16 school year. But that, too, is being met with skepticism, especially from parents who depend on lotteries to get their children into schools that are in different parts of the city.
“They want to make sure out-of-bounds kids think they will be grandfathered in while actually leaving open the option to boot them,” another DC Urban Moms user writes.
The 20-person committee will release its first recommendations in May 2014, a month after the Democratic mayoral primary. The scheduling muffles the potential political impact on Mayor Vince Gray if he decides to run for a second term.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The “MAGA Former Dancer” Named to a Top Job at the Kennedy Center Inherits a Troubled Program
Sandwich Guy Has Become DC’s Hero
We’re Calling It Now: Sandwich Guy Is the DC Halloween Costume of the Year
In Wild Coincidence, White House Drowns Out Epstein Rally With Jets; Tech Titans Will Gather on Rose Garden Patio Tonight; and Madison Cawthorn Hopes to Return to DC
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Fiona Apple Wrote a Song About This Maryland Court-Watching Effort
The Confusing Dispute Over the Future of the Anacostia Playhouse
Protecting Our Drinking Water Keeps Him Up at Night
More from News & Politics
White House Seriously Asks People to Believe Trump’s Letter to Epstein Is Fake, Oliver North and Fawn Hall Got Married, and It’s Time to Plan Your Apple-Picking Excursion
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
“End the Occupation”: Photos From Saturday’s “We Are All DC” March
Scott Bessent Got in Another Argument With a Coworker; Trump Threatens Chicago, Gets Booed in New York; and Our Critic Has an Early Report From Kayu
Congress Won’t Extend Trump’s Takeover of the DC Police, Norton Reiterates Plans to Run Again, and the Commanders’ New Season Starts Sunday
Why Trump Should Not Dine Out in DC
DC Sues Trump Administration Over Deployment of National Guard Troops
In Wild Coincidence, White House Drowns Out Epstein Rally With Jets; Tech Titans Will Gather on Rose Garden Patio Tonight; and Madison Cawthorn Hopes to Return to DC