Turns out all the traffic cameras the District government has posted around the city are good for something besides padding municipal revenue. (They issued nearly $85 million in tickets in fiscal 2012.) A study released Monday by the District Department of Transportation finds that since the DC government started deploying traffic cameras across town, drivers are crashing less often and hurting fewer people.
DDOT found that in the locations around 87 active cameras, there were 1,863 reported crashes in the three years after the devices were installed, a 16.8 percent drop from the 2,240 collisions reported in the three years before the cameras were mounted.
The number of collisions causing injuries dropped by nearly 20 percent, too, going from 841 in the three years before installation to 673 in the three years after. The number of sustained injuries in the monitored locations had a similar decline, going from 1,251 to 996.
The cameras have also largely accomplished their intended effect of getting cars to slow down. Only 13 of the 87 cameras recorded average speeds of above the posted speed limits, with none of the locations posting average speeds of more than 15 miles per hour over the limit. Of the 74 locations with average speeds under the limit, 29 have seen reductions by at least 10 miles per hour since the cameras went up.
The study also found that even where there are no cameras, drivers are becoming more mindful. Of the 39 locations where officials plan to install cameras, only two have average speeds above the posted speed limit.
You can see all the locations of all of DC’s traffic cameras on the city’s Atlas Plus site:
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
DC Credits Traffic Cameras With Less Speeding and Fewer Collisions
District drivers have crashed their less often since the cameras were installed.
Turns out all the traffic cameras the District government has posted around the city are good for something besides padding municipal revenue. (They issued nearly $85 million in tickets in fiscal 2012.) A study released Monday by the District Department of Transportation finds that since the DC government started deploying traffic cameras across town, drivers are crashing less often and hurting fewer people.
DDOT found that in the locations around 87 active cameras, there were 1,863 reported crashes in the three years after the devices were installed, a 16.8 percent drop from the 2,240 collisions reported in the three years before the cameras were mounted.
The number of collisions causing injuries dropped by nearly 20 percent, too, going from 841 in the three years before installation to 673 in the three years after. The number of sustained injuries in the monitored locations had a similar decline, going from 1,251 to 996.
The cameras have also largely accomplished their intended effect of getting cars to slow down. Only 13 of the 87 cameras recorded average speeds of above the posted speed limits, with none of the locations posting average speeds of more than 15 miles per hour over the limit. Of the 74 locations with average speeds under the limit, 29 have seen reductions by at least 10 miles per hour since the cameras went up.
The study also found that even where there are no cameras, drivers are becoming more mindful. Of the 39 locations where officials plan to install cameras, only two have average speeds above the posted speed limit.
You can see all the locations of all of DC’s traffic cameras on the city’s Atlas Plus site:
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
The “MAGA Former Dancer” Named to a Top Job at the Kennedy Center Inherits a Troubled Program
White House Seriously Asks People to Believe Trump’s Letter to Epstein Is Fake, Oliver North and Fawn Hall Got Married, and It’s Time to Plan Your Apple-Picking Excursion
Trump Travels One Block From White House, Declares DC Crime-Free; Barron Trump Moves to Town; and GOP Begins Siege of Home Rule
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Fiona Apple Wrote a Song About This Maryland Court-Watching Effort
The Confusing Dispute Over the Future of the Anacostia Playhouse
Protecting Our Drinking Water Keeps Him Up at Night
More from News & Politics
5 Things to Know About “Severance” Star Tramell Tillman
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Patel Dined at Rao’s After Kirk Shooting, Nonviolent Offenses Led to Most Arrests During Trump’s DC Crackdown, and You Should Try These Gougères
How a DC Area Wetlands Restoration Project Could Help Clean Up the Anacostia River
Pressure Grows on FBI Leadership as Search for Kirk’s Killer Continues, Kennedy Center Fires More Staffers, and Spotted Lanternflies Are Everywhere
What Is Free DC?
Manhunt for Charlie Kirk Shooter Continues, Britain Fires US Ambassador Over Epstein Connections, and Sandwich Guy Will Get a Jury Trial
Can Two Guys Ride a Rickshaw over the Himalayas? It Turns Out They Can.