All the favorable coverage that's fit to print. Photograph by Flickr user NCinDC.
Local football fans are going to see a lot more of the Washington Times this year under a “content and marketing partnership” announced today by the newspaper and Washington’s NFL team. According to the new arrangement, the Times will lend some of its reporters and columnists to the team for in-game videos to be shown on the scoreboard at FedEx Field.
The two entities will also be publishing partners, of a sort. The Times will produce a digital magazine on all things burgundy and gold, while the Times’s Friday editions during the NFL season will come wrapped with game previews sponsored by the team, but containing content created by Times editorial staffers.
In the scoreboard videos, Times sportswriters, like beat reporter Zac Boyer and columnist Thom Loverro, will share their insights on game highlights. In return, the paper will get access to players, coaches, and front-office personnel, according to the press release announcing the partnership.
It’s not uncommon for print reporters to appear on sports broadcasts owned by major sports teams. But the Times-Redskins team-up seems unusually snuggly.
The paper denies there is a conflict issue. “The way we cover the Redskins remains exactly the same,” John Solomon, the daily’s editor, tells Washingtonian. “We have 100 percent independence in terms of what we put into the magazine and say on the air.” The team declined multiple requests for elaboration on the nature of its deal with the Times.
It’s not clear how anyone would be able to tell if the new deal does influence the paper’s sports pages, which historically shows plenty of deference to the team bosses in Ashburn. Boyer’s most recent stories from training camp report on new wide receiver DeSean Jackson nestling into to the offense, quarterback Robert Griffin III having a “fresh mind,” and new head coach Jon Gruden saying “all signs are good” on the third-year passer.
More significantly, perhaps, the Times is a staunch defender of the team’s current name. Unlike the Washington Post, where columnists like Mike Wise and Sally Jenkins regularly remind readers that the team’s name is a dictionary-defined slur of Native Americans, the Times’sLoverro often comes to the team’s aid.
A Loverro column last month conceded that momentum is on the side of those demanding a name change, but asserted that many of the name’s opponents “couldn’t have cared less about the plight of Native Americans before they were told they should be offended by this name, and who will go back to caring even less if and when the name is changed.”
In June, when the US Patent and Trademark Office invalidated the team’s federal trademark protection because its name is a racial slur, the Times reported that the patent office had no public complaints against the team on file, as though that somehow makes the name less offensive.
There’s nothing wrong with a pro-team editorial policy, of course, as long as the paper isn’t making any money from their support.
“It’s going to be confusing for people who consume Redskins content from the Washington Times,” says Kelly McBride, resident ethicist at the journalism-watchdog Poynter Institute. “This certainly has potential for actual conflict,” McBride continues. “Then there’s the perception of conflict. All [journalists] have with our audience is the perception of trust.”
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
The Washington Times and the Redskins Are Now “Content Partners”
The conservative daily and Washington’s NFL team have a new special relationship.
Local football fans are going to see a lot more of the Washington Times this year under a “content and marketing partnership” announced today by the newspaper and Washington’s NFL team. According to the new arrangement, the Times will lend some of its reporters and columnists to the team for in-game videos to be shown on the scoreboard at FedEx Field.
The two entities will also be publishing partners, of a sort. The Times will produce a digital magazine on all things burgundy and gold, while the Times’s Friday editions during the NFL season will come wrapped with game previews sponsored by the team, but containing content created by Times editorial staffers.
In the scoreboard videos, Times sportswriters, like beat reporter Zac Boyer and columnist Thom Loverro, will share their insights on game highlights. In return, the paper will get access to players, coaches, and front-office personnel, according to the press release announcing the partnership.
It’s not uncommon for print reporters to appear on sports broadcasts owned by major sports teams. But the Times-Redskins team-up seems unusually snuggly.
The paper denies there is a conflict issue. “The way we cover the Redskins remains exactly the same,” John Solomon, the daily’s editor, tells Washingtonian. “We have 100 percent independence in terms of what we put into the magazine and say on the air.” The team declined multiple requests for elaboration on the nature of its deal with the Times.
It’s not clear how anyone would be able to tell if the new deal does influence the paper’s sports pages, which historically shows plenty of deference to the team bosses in Ashburn. Boyer’s most recent stories from training camp report on new wide receiver DeSean Jackson nestling into to the offense, quarterback Robert Griffin III having a “fresh mind,” and new head coach Jon Gruden saying “all signs are good” on the third-year passer.
More significantly, perhaps, the Times is a staunch defender of the team’s current name. Unlike the Washington Post, where columnists like Mike Wise and Sally Jenkins regularly remind readers that the team’s name is a dictionary-defined slur of Native Americans, the Times’s Loverro often comes to the team’s aid.
A Loverro column last month conceded that momentum is on the side of those demanding a name change, but asserted that many of the name’s opponents “couldn’t have cared less about the plight of Native Americans before they were told they should be offended by this name, and who will go back to caring even less if and when the name is changed.”
In June, when the US Patent and Trademark Office invalidated the team’s federal trademark protection because its name is a racial slur, the Times reported that the patent office had no public complaints against the team on file, as though that somehow makes the name less offensive.
There’s nothing wrong with a pro-team editorial policy, of course, as long as the paper isn’t making any money from their support.
“It’s going to be confusing for people who consume Redskins content from the Washington Times,” says Kelly McBride, resident ethicist at the journalism-watchdog Poynter Institute. “This certainly has potential for actual conflict,” McBride continues. “Then there’s the perception of conflict. All [journalists] have with our audience is the perception of trust.”
Find Benjamin Freed on Twitter at @brfreed.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Missing Men of Mount Pleasant
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
The Washington Nationals Just Fired the Manager and GM Who Led Them to a Championship. Why Has the Team Been so Bad Since?
Your Story About How Pickleball Changed Your Life Could Get You a Game on the National Mall
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
More from News & Politics
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This July
The Washington Nationals Just Fired the Manager and GM Who Led Them to a Championship. Why Has the Team Been so Bad Since?
FBI Building Now on Track to Leave DC After All, Whistleblower Leaks Texts Suggesting Justice Department Planned to Blow Off Federal Court Orders, and NPS Cuts Leave Assateague Island Without Lifeguards
Families of DC Air Disaster Victims Criticize Army’s Response, Trump Settles His Scores Via Tariff, and Police Dog Kicked at Dulles Returns to Work
This DC-Area Lawyer Wants More Americans Betting on Elections
Trump Threatens DC Takeover, Says He’d Run the City “So Good”; Supreme Court OKs Mass Federal Worker Layoffs; and You Should Go Pick Some Sunflowers
Trump Pledges Support for RFK Stadium Plan, Ben’s Chili Bowl Will Strand Us Half-Smokeless for Months, and Pediatricians Are Suing RFK Jr.
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor