Paul Clement is the GOP’s unofficial super lawyer. Solicitor general during the George
W. Bush administration and currently a partner at the DC law firm Bancroft, he has
recently argued some of the biggest pieces of the Republican agenda. The trouble is,
he can’t seem to win.
His losses certainly aren’t due to a lack of skill. Clement’s peers across the political
spectrum consider him one of the nation’s most talented appellate advocates. When
he argued against President Obama’s health-care reform law at the Supreme Court earlier
this year, the chattering class largely agreed he had wiped the floor of One First
Street with his opponent, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. But in spite of Clement’s
seemingly flawless delivery, the justices upheld Obamacare.
He also argued in favor of Arizona’s controversial immigration law at the high court
last term. Though the justices upheld the most contentious piece of the law, which
allows police to check people’s immigration status, they struck down other key parts
of the statute.
This fall, Clement lost his second battle at a federal appeals court arguing that
the Defense of Marriage Act—which defines marriage as between a man and a woman—is
constitutional. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in October that DOMA violates
the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Clement previously lost the same fight
at the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which found the law unconstitutional in May.
The DOMA losses may carry an extra sting, given that Clement very publicly gave up
his partnership at 800-lawyer King & Spalding to defend the law. When House Republicans,
led by Speaker John Boehner, retained Clement to defend DOMA last year, King & Spalding
withdrew from the representation amid backlash from clients and the LGBT community.
Clement tendered his resignation—stating that “a representation should not be abandoned
because the client’s legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters”—and
joined small, conservative Bancroft.
One thing Clement isn’t losing is money. The House Administration Committee revealed
in October that, under a contract with Bancroft, House Republicans have so far paid
nearly $1.5 million of taxpayer money in legal fees to Clement’s firm for the Defense
of Marriage representation.
A version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of The Washingtonian.
Paul Clement, the GOP’s Unofficial Super Lawyer, Can’t Seem to Win
Despite a strong reputation, Clement is struggling with a losing streak.
Paul Clement is the GOP’s unofficial super lawyer. Solicitor general during the George
W. Bush administration and currently a partner at the DC law firm Bancroft, he has
recently argued some of the biggest pieces of the Republican agenda. The trouble is,
he can’t seem to win.
His losses certainly aren’t due to a lack of skill. Clement’s peers across the political
spectrum consider him one of the nation’s most talented appellate advocates. When
he argued against President Obama’s health-care reform law at the Supreme Court earlier
this year, the chattering class largely agreed he had wiped the floor of One First
Street with his opponent, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. But in spite of Clement’s
seemingly flawless delivery, the justices upheld Obamacare.
He also argued in favor of Arizona’s controversial immigration law at the high court
last term. Though the justices upheld the most contentious piece of the law, which
allows police to check people’s immigration status, they struck down other key parts
of the statute.
This fall, Clement lost his second battle at a federal appeals court arguing that
the Defense of Marriage Act—which defines marriage as between a man and a woman—is
constitutional. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in October that DOMA violates
the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Clement previously lost the same fight
at the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which found the law unconstitutional in May.
The DOMA losses may carry an extra sting, given that Clement very publicly gave up
his partnership at 800-lawyer King & Spalding to defend the law. When House Republicans,
led by Speaker John Boehner, retained Clement to defend DOMA last year, King & Spalding
withdrew from the representation amid backlash from clients and the LGBT community.
Clement tendered his resignation—stating that “a representation should not be abandoned
because the client’s legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters”—and
joined small, conservative Bancroft.
One thing Clement isn’t losing is money. The House Administration Committee revealed
in October that, under a contract with Bancroft, House Republicans have so far paid
nearly $1.5 million of taxpayer money in legal fees to Clement’s firm for the Defense
of Marriage representation.
A version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of The Washingtonian.
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Rax King’s New Essay Collection Celebrates the “Sloppy” Side of DC Culture
Congressman Proposes Renaming Entire Kennedy Center for Trump, Poll Says Most Americans Are Paying Attention to Epstein Story, and We Tell You Where to Get a Mahjong Game
Inside the Library of Congress’s Collection
Trump Wants to Prosecute Beyoncé, That DC “Worst Traffic” Study Is Flawed, and Our Food Critic Tried Lucky Danger
Jonathan Swan’s Face Is the 2020 Meme We Needed
Washingtonian Magazine
August Issue: Best Burgers
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Need to Know What Time It Is? 6 Places to Find a Sundial Around DC.
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
More from News & Politics
Journalists Savor Prospect of Pete Hegseth Running for Office, Trump Wants a White House Ballroom, and Katie Ledecky Won Another World Title
Eric Adjepong on Mixing Tradition and Modernity at His DC Restaurant Elmina
Can the Education Department Really Force Virginia Schools to Change Their Policies About Trans Kids?
Rax King’s New Essay Collection Celebrates the “Sloppy” Side of DC Culture
Congressman Proposes Renaming Entire Kennedy Center for Trump, Poll Says Most Americans Are Paying Attention to Epstein Story, and We Tell You Where to Get a Mahjong Game
DC Council Votes to Slow Down and Cap Tipped Wage Increases
Trump Wants to Prosecute Beyoncé, That DC “Worst Traffic” Study Is Flawed, and Our Food Critic Tried Lucky Danger
Too Hot for Ice Cream? Store Owners Say Extreme Heat Actually Keeps Customers at Home.