Turns out all the traffic cameras the District government has posted around the city are good for something besides padding municipal revenue. (They issued nearly $85 million in tickets in fiscal 2012.) A study released Monday by the District Department of Transportation finds that since the DC government started deploying traffic cameras across town, drivers are crashing less often and hurting fewer people.
DDOT found that in the locations around 87 active cameras, there were 1,863 reported crashes in the three years after the devices were installed, a 16.8 percent drop from the 2,240 collisions reported in the three years before the cameras were mounted.
The number of collisions causing injuries dropped by nearly 20 percent, too, going from 841 in the three years before installation to 673 in the three years after. The number of sustained injuries in the monitored locations had a similar decline, going from 1,251 to 996.
The cameras have also largely accomplished their intended effect of getting cars to slow down. Only 13 of the 87 cameras recorded average speeds of above the posted speed limits, with none of the locations posting average speeds of more than 15 miles per hour over the limit. Of the 74 locations with average speeds under the limit, 29 have seen reductions by at least 10 miles per hour since the cameras went up.
The study also found that even where there are no cameras, drivers are becoming more mindful. Of the 39 locations where officials plan to install cameras, only two have average speeds above the posted speed limit.
You can see all the locations of all of DC’s traffic cameras on the city’s Atlas Plus site:
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
DC Credits Traffic Cameras With Less Speeding and Fewer Collisions
District drivers have crashed their less often since the cameras were installed.
Turns out all the traffic cameras the District government has posted around the city are good for something besides padding municipal revenue. (They issued nearly $85 million in tickets in fiscal 2012.) A study released Monday by the District Department of Transportation finds that since the DC government started deploying traffic cameras across town, drivers are crashing less often and hurting fewer people.
DDOT found that in the locations around 87 active cameras, there were 1,863 reported crashes in the three years after the devices were installed, a 16.8 percent drop from the 2,240 collisions reported in the three years before the cameras were mounted.
The number of collisions causing injuries dropped by nearly 20 percent, too, going from 841 in the three years before installation to 673 in the three years after. The number of sustained injuries in the monitored locations had a similar decline, going from 1,251 to 996.
The cameras have also largely accomplished their intended effect of getting cars to slow down. Only 13 of the 87 cameras recorded average speeds of above the posted speed limits, with none of the locations posting average speeds of more than 15 miles per hour over the limit. Of the 74 locations with average speeds under the limit, 29 have seen reductions by at least 10 miles per hour since the cameras went up.
The study also found that even where there are no cameras, drivers are becoming more mindful. Of the 39 locations where officials plan to install cameras, only two have average speeds above the posted speed limit.
You can see all the locations of all of DC’s traffic cameras on the city’s Atlas Plus site:
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Missing Men of Mount Pleasant
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This July
The Washington Nationals Just Fired the Manager and GM Who Led Them to a Championship. Why Has the Team Been so Bad Since?
FBI Building Now on Track to Leave DC After All, Whistleblower Leaks Texts Suggesting Justice Department Planned to Blow Off Federal Court Orders, and NPS Cuts Leave Assateague Island Without Lifeguards
Families of DC Air Disaster Victims Criticize Army’s Response, Trump Settles His Scores Via Tariff, and Police Dog Kicked at Dulles Returns to Work
This DC-Area Lawyer Wants More Americans Betting on Elections
Trump Threatens DC Takeover, Says He’d Run the City “So Good”; Supreme Court OKs Mass Federal Worker Layoffs; and You Should Go Pick Some Sunflowers
Trump Pledges Support for RFK Stadium Plan, Ben’s Chili Bowl Will Strand Us Half-Smokeless for Months, and Pediatricians Are Suing RFK Jr.
Muriel Bowser Defends Her BLM Plaza Decision and Looks Back on a Decade as Mayor