While Congress busies itself with tearing down the District’s reproductive-health laws, it is set on allowing locals at least one small measure of freedom. The longtime prohibition on sledding down Capitol Hill is set to fall thanks to a provision inserted into the Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 2016, which passed out of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday and is now headed for a full vote.
Dating back to 1876, the sledding ban has been more stringently enforced in the name of “national security” since 9/11. But the movement for the right to sled down Washington’s most visible slope kicked up in February after an unnamed committee chairman dispatched Capitol Police to scare away a rabble of youngsters who attempted to sled down a fresh blanket of snow. In response, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s non-voting delegate in the House, declared her intentions to end the sledding ban once and for all.
Norton’s goal appears to have been achieved, thanks to some legislative wrangling from Representative Sam Farr, a California Democrat who sits on the Appropriations Committee.
“Children with sleds are not a threat to our national security,” Farr says in a press release.
Farr’s amendment does not technically overturn the sledding ban, but it instructs Capitol Police to ignore it in favor of more pressing law-enforcement duties, like monitoring traffic and trying to remember not to leave service weapons in the bathroom.
But more than Norton, what might have moved Congress the most on this issue is the Great Sled Uprising of March 5, when, following another snowstorm that resulted in DC Public closing for the day, dozens of children ascended Capitol Hill, sleds and toboggans in tow, and brazenly defied the law. The few Capitol Police officers patrolling the sleepy mound that afternoon were easily overwhelmed and made no attempt to stop the fun.
“In a Congress that doesn’t solve problems they solved one problem,” says Tim Krepp, a tour guide and parent who accompanied his rebellious kids to the snowy insurrection. “It’s one small step forward.”
While the potential end to the sledding ban is encouraging for the District’s struggle for greater autonomy, it pales against a House vote last night to strike down a recent District law that would prevent employers from dismissing workers based on choices they make about birth control and reproductive health. Although the White House says President Obama will veto the move, it still marks the first time in more than three decades Congress has formally used its authority to overturn legislation passed by the DC Council.
“The juxtaposition of allowing sledding while also stripping away our rights is hard to take,” says Krepp.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Capitol Hill Sledding Ban Set to Fall
Language in an appropriations bill would order Capitol Police to stand down against people seeking snowy fun.
While Congress busies itself with tearing down the District’s reproductive-health laws, it is set on allowing locals at least one small measure of freedom. The longtime prohibition on sledding down Capitol Hill is set to fall thanks to a provision inserted into the Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 2016, which passed out of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday and is now headed for a full vote.
Dating back to 1876, the sledding ban has been more stringently enforced in the name of “national security” since 9/11. But the movement for the right to sled down Washington’s most visible slope kicked up in February after an unnamed committee chairman dispatched Capitol Police to scare away a rabble of youngsters who attempted to sled down a fresh blanket of snow. In response, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s non-voting delegate in the House, declared her intentions to end the sledding ban once and for all.
Norton’s goal appears to have been achieved, thanks to some legislative wrangling from Representative Sam Farr, a California Democrat who sits on the Appropriations Committee.
“Children with sleds are not a threat to our national security,” Farr says in a press release.
Farr’s amendment does not technically overturn the sledding ban, but it instructs Capitol Police to ignore it in favor of more pressing law-enforcement duties, like monitoring traffic and trying to remember not to leave service weapons in the bathroom.
But more than Norton, what might have moved Congress the most on this issue is the Great Sled Uprising of March 5, when, following another snowstorm that resulted in DC Public closing for the day, dozens of children ascended Capitol Hill, sleds and toboggans in tow, and brazenly defied the law. The few Capitol Police officers patrolling the sleepy mound that afternoon were easily overwhelmed and made no attempt to stop the fun.
“In a Congress that doesn’t solve problems they solved one problem,” says Tim Krepp, a tour guide and parent who accompanied his rebellious kids to the snowy insurrection. “It’s one small step forward.”
While the potential end to the sledding ban is encouraging for the District’s struggle for greater autonomy, it pales against a House vote last night to strike down a recent District law that would prevent employers from dismissing workers based on choices they make about birth control and reproductive health. Although the White House says President Obama will veto the move, it still marks the first time in more than three decades Congress has formally used its authority to overturn legislation passed by the DC Council.
“The juxtaposition of allowing sledding while also stripping away our rights is hard to take,” says Krepp.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The “MAGA Former Dancer” Named to a Top Job at the Kennedy Center Inherits a Troubled Program
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
White House Seriously Asks People to Believe Trump’s Letter to Epstein Is Fake, Oliver North and Fawn Hall Got Married, and It’s Time to Plan Your Apple-Picking Excursion
Scott Bessent Got in Another Argument With a Coworker; Trump Threatens Chicago, Gets Booed in New York; and Our Critic Has an Early Report From Kayu
Sandwich Guy Has Become DC’s Hero
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
Fiona Apple Wrote a Song About This Maryland Court-Watching Effort
The Confusing Dispute Over the Future of the Anacostia Playhouse
Protecting Our Drinking Water Keeps Him Up at Night
More from News & Politics
Manhunt for Charlie Kirk Shooter Continues, Britain Fires US Ambassador Over Epstein Connections, and Sandwich Guy Will Get a Jury Trial
Can Two Guys Ride a Rickshaw over the Himalayas? It Turns Out They Can.
Trump Travels One Block From White House, Declares DC Crime-Free; Barron Trump Moves to Town; and GOP Begins Siege of Home Rule
Donald Trump Dines at Joe’s Seafood Next to the White House
White House Seriously Asks People to Believe Trump’s Letter to Epstein Is Fake, Oliver North and Fawn Hall Got Married, and It’s Time to Plan Your Apple-Picking Excursion
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
“End the Occupation”: Photos From Saturday’s “We Are All DC” March
Scott Bessent Got in Another Argument With a Coworker; Trump Threatens Chicago, Gets Booed in New York; and Our Critic Has an Early Report From Kayu