Newsletters

Get Well+Being delivered to your inbox every Monday Morning.

2 Years of Uber Fighting DC Government in 11 Minutes (Video)
A new mini-documentary recaps Uber’s turbulent existence in DC since bringing its popular taxi dispatching service to town. By Benjamin Freed
Comments () | Published October 22, 2013
Since arriving in the District nearly two years ago, the digital car service Uber has given city residents two things: the ability to hail a sedan or taxi through a smartphone app, and a famously open-ended feud pitting a Silicon Valley darling against a local regulatory regime. But if the last 23 months are too dizzying to recount in a single article, a local filmmaker, Rob Montz, has put together a short documentary on Uber’s tempestuous time in DC.

Uber Wars debuted earlier today on Reason’s website and, consistent with the magazine’s libertarian ethos, the narrative comes down squarely on the side of free enterprise. But Montz also gives DC Taxicab Commission Chairman Ron Linton a fairer shake than the typical Uber partisan. Linton comes off as more an able bureaucrat trying to balance the interests of all sides involved, rather than the symptom of agency corruption.

Montz instead casts Uber’s struggles in Washington as a fight with the DC Council, which was barraged last year with e-mails and phone calls from Uber users who wanted the company left alone. (An effort that largely succeeded.) Montz talks to Council members and to a few journalists—myself included—who have covered Uber’s many squabbles with local government.

The film runs through this past summer, as Uber felt threatened by the newest regulations requiring taxis to accept non-cash forms of payment. (Uber won that fight, too, getting an exemption to use its proprietary payment system rather than one pre-selected by the Taxicab Commission.)

The Uber front has been relatively quite for the past few months, since the company said its newest product, low-cost black cars branded “UberX,” would be run out by DC’s regulations governing sedan service. UberX continues to be available to the company’s DC customers.

Watch Uber Wars below, and be sure to stick around for the end credits, featuring DC Council testimony by a wonderfully mad witness who believed Uber-dispatched cars could be used for truly nefarious purposes.

Categories:

Local News
Subscribe to Washingtonian

Discuss this story

Feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. The Washingtonian reserves the right to remove or edit content once posted.
  • Dave Sutton

    This doc sounds like it was commissioned by Uber. Here’s a documentary for another day:

    There’s something techies and libertarians never understood about taxis: They are a public utility. Though they are businesses, they are also an extension of public transportation.

    As such, taxis were intended to serve the public interest—particularly the poor and disabled. But Uber doesn’t serve people without a smart phone, credit card or who use a wheelchair. So, Uber inevitably cherry picks the easiest and most lucrative fares available in DC.

    As traditional taxi drivers’ incomes continue to drop, their ability and willingness to serve profit-neutral fares, like the poor, disabled and elderly, will drop precipitously. Traditional taxi drivers will simply be too desperate to reliably help poor and disabled passengers. Poor communities in DC will become the biggest losers of the Taxi Wars.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Posted at 03:21 PM/ET, 10/22/2013 RSS | Print | Permalink | Comments () | Washingtonian.com Blogs