Newsletters

Get Well+Being delivered to your inbox every Monday Morning.

SCOTUS Watch
It’s official—Elena Kagan is President Obama’s choice to replace Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. Not surprisingly, everyone is eager to voice their opinion on the nomination. By Marisa M. Kashino
Comments () | Published May 10, 2010
Here’s who’s on Team Kagan:

In a statement praising Obama’s choice, Harvard Law School dean Martha Minow—who was also mentioned as a possible high-court pick—called Kagan “a leader of tremendous vision who has been supremely dedicated to justice and the rule of law throughout a distinguished career marked by the passionate pursuit of excellence.”

Co-president of the National Women’s Law Center Marcia Greenberger said, “We have known Elena Kagan for many years and have the greatest respect for her outstanding accomplishments, considerable legal skills, and fair-mindedness.”

President of the National Partnership for Women and Families, Debra Ness, had more kind words: “Elena Kagan’s record—as a practicing attorney, a law-school professor, the first woman dean of Harvard Law School, and our nation’s first woman Solicitor General—is distinguished by keen intellect, fair and independent thinking, and remarkable achievement.”

Michael Keegan, president of People for the American Way called Kagan “a bright and clearly qualified nominee.”

Said John Podesta, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress: “As a friend and colleague of Elena Kagan for more than 20 years, I applaud her nomination to the Supreme Court. General Kagan is a first-rate intellect, a passionate legal scholar, and a dedicated public servant—and she is both well prepared and well suited to serve on the nation’s highest court.”

Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, is also a Kagan fan: “Along with her sterling academic and professional qualifications, she will bring to the Court a respect for core constitutional values and a willingness to stand up for the rights of ordinary Americans. Her appointment also represents an historic step forward as women continue to take their rightful place on the highest court in the land.”

Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will oversee Kagan’s confirmation. In a statement, he said: “Ms. Kagan broke the glass ceiling when she was appointed as the first woman to serve as Solicitor General and also previously when she became the first woman to serve as dean of Harvard Law School. Her historic accomplishments and the way she has conducted herself in these positions has earned her a place at the top of the legal profession.”

Here’s who’s on the opposing team:

Charmaine Yoest, President and CEO of Americans United for Life, offered this statement: “President Obama’s choice of Solicitor General Kagan makes it clear that liberal judicial activism will be the impact of this untried and untested judicial pick, leading to unknown consequences for the American people. The President’s portrayal of Solicitor General Kagan as mainstream and centrist is inconsistent with Kagan’s own record. She has been an abortion advocate and activist and an apologist for activist judges. Kagan’s confirmation will give us the kind of activist, radical Supreme Court that gave us the [Roe v. Wade] decision.”

Carrie Severino, chief counsel of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, says in a statement, “Obama wants to pack the court with reliable liberal votes to rubber-stamp an agenda that he knows the American people would not accept. What better way than to appoint a loyalist from his own Department of Justice with a thin public record to advance his leftist legacy through the Court.”

From former Indiana congressman David McIntosh, co-founder of the Federalist Society: “Solicitor General Kagan has been nominated with no judicial experience, a mere two years of private-law practice, and only a year as Solicitor General of the United States. She is one of the most inexperienced nominees to the US Supreme Court in recent memory.”

Edward Whelan, president of the conservative think tank the Ethics and Public Policy Center agrees: “Among Supreme Court nominees over the last 50 years or more, Kagan may well be the nominee with the least amount of relevant experience.”

And the undecideds:

Alabama senator Jeff Sessions, a Republican and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is reserving judgement: “Although the Committee is familiar with Ms. Kagan from her previous nomination as Solicitor General, a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court is a far more significant position. Accordingly, her nomination merits a fresh review based on different criteria. It is unwise to make a judgment on her nomination until that evaluation is conducted.”

And finally, you may recall that several of The Washingtonian’s Top Lawyers also had a lot to say about Kagan as the next Supreme Court justice. 

Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
 

More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos  

Categories:

SCOTUS Watch
Subscribe to Washingtonian

Discuss this story

Feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. The Washingtonian reserves the right to remove or edit content once posted.
  • Lxin12

    What obligations, and opportunities too, will this give vibram five fingers sale her to love and honour such a husband, every hour, more vibram five fingers shoes and more! as she will see his wisdom in a thousand instances, and experience his indulgence to her in ten thousand, to the praise of his politeness, and the honour of them both!--And then, when select parties of pleasure or business engaged him not abroad, in his home conversation, to have him delight to instruct and open her views, and inspire her with an ambition to enlarge her mind, and more and more to excel! What an intellectual kind of married life would such persons find theirs! And how suitable to the rules of policy and self-love in the vibram five fingers gentleman; for is not the wife, and are not her improvements, all _his own_?--_Absolutely_, as I may say, _his own_? And does not every excellence she can be adorned by, redound to her husband's honour because she is his, even more than to _her own_!--In like manner as no dishonour affects a .

    Who knows, had I been here--But away, too painful reflections--They lived to a good vibram five fingers old age, and fell like fruit fully ripe: they _died the death of the righteous_; I must follow them in time, God knows how soon; and, _Oh! that my latter end may be like theirs!_ Once more, forgive me, my dear vibram five fingers shoes friend, this small tribute to their memories: and believe, that I am not so five fingers kso ungrateful for God's mercies, as to let the loss of these dear good folks lessen with me the joy and delight I have still left me, in the health and the love of the best of husbands, and good men; in the children, charming as ever mother could boast of--charming, I mean, principally, in the dawning beauties of their minds, and in the pleasure their towardliness of nature gives me; including, as I always do, my dear Miss Goodwin, and have reason to do, from her dutiful love of me, and observation of all I say to her; in the preservation to me of the best and worthiest of parents, .

    " Polly returned with the following. "So," thought I, "a letter!--I could have spared that, I am sure." I expected no favour from it. So tremblingly, opened it. "MY DEAR, "I would not have vibram five fingers ksoyou sit up for me. We are getting apace into the matrimonial recriminations. _You knew the time!_--So did I, my dear!--But it seems that the time is over with both; and I have had the mortification, for some past weeks, to five fingers vibram come home to a very different Pamela, than I used to leave all company and all pleasure for.--I hope we shall better understand one another. But you cannot see me at present with any advantage to yourself; and I would not, that any thing farther should pass, to add to the regrets of both. I wish you good rest. I will give your cause a *#ms_zhengxiaoling02 fair hearing, when I am more fit to hear all your pleas, and your excuses. I cannot be insensible, that the reason for the concern you have lately shewn, must lie deeper than, perhaps, you'll now vibram five fingers speed own.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Posted at 10:54 AM/ET, 05/10/2010 RSS | Print | Permalink | Comments () | Washingtonian.com Blogs