The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority says no more political or issue-based advertisements will appear at its stations or on its vehicles this year, an apparent response to a New York group’s latest attempt place potentially incindiary billboards around DC’s public transportation network.
While Metro spokesman Dan Stessel tells Washingtonian the move, which was approved unanimously during Thursday’s board meeting, is unrelated to any specific advertisement, the timing and circumstances are impossible to overlook. The decision comes one day after Pamela Geller, an anti-Islam activist, announced she would be purchasing ad space to display the winning artwork from a “Draw Muhammad” contest she staged earlier this month. (Depictions of the prophet are barred by Islamic law.) The contest, held in Garland, Texas, made headlines nationallly after two gunmen started a firefight with security guards outside the venue hosting the event. While both gunmen were killed, the terror group ISIS claimed responsibility for their actions.
“Pursuant to its powers…to regulate the use of facilities owned or controlled by the Authority, the Board hereby directs management to close WMATA’s advertising space to any and all issue-oriented advertising, including but not limited to, political, religious, and advocacy advertising until the end of the calendar year,” the WMATA resolution reads. “During this period, the board will review what role such issue-oriented advertising has in WMATA’s mission to deliver safe, equitable, and reliable transportation services to the Nation’s Capital, and will seek public comment and participation for its consideration before making a final policy determination.”
Stessel says Geller’s name never came up in the discussion leading up to the ad ban, but the Washington Post‘s Paul Duggan reports that her planned ads gave at least one member of Metro’s board a fright.
Metro official says agency fears a cartoon ad of the Prophet Muhammad would make buses and subway stations “terrorists targets.”
This would hardly be the first time Geller has provoked a change in Metro’s advertising policy. In 2012, the transit agency refused to post billboards by her group, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, that featured Koran verses accompanied by photographs of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Geller sued, and a judge ordered the transit agency that it could not decline ads based on their political stripes; Metro attached disclaimers to political ads following the ruling.
Although political ads make up a significant portion of Metro’s advertising revenue, overall ad sales are a puny segment of the cash-strapped transit agency’s budget. Metro’s projected ad revenue for the current fiscal year—calculated long before this decision—is just $20 million, compared to $48 million in parking fees and $835 million in passenger fares. There is no word yet on how much of a financial toll will come from cutting out political ads.
Metro Bans Political Advertisements for the Rest of the Year
The decision comes a day after a controversial anti-Islam group said it would buy bus ads.
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority says no more political or issue-based advertisements will appear at its stations or on its vehicles this year, an apparent response to a New York group’s latest attempt place potentially incindiary billboards around DC’s public transportation network.
While Metro spokesman Dan Stessel tells Washingtonian the move, which was approved unanimously during Thursday’s board meeting, is unrelated to any specific advertisement, the timing and circumstances are impossible to overlook. The decision comes one day after Pamela Geller, an anti-Islam activist, announced she would be purchasing ad space to display the winning artwork from a “Draw Muhammad” contest she staged earlier this month. (Depictions of the prophet are barred by Islamic law.) The contest, held in Garland, Texas, made headlines nationallly after two gunmen started a firefight with security guards outside the venue hosting the event. While both gunmen were killed, the terror group ISIS claimed responsibility for their actions.
“Pursuant to its powers…to regulate the use of facilities owned or controlled by the Authority, the Board hereby directs management to close WMATA’s advertising space to any and all issue-oriented advertising, including but not limited to, political, religious, and advocacy advertising until the end of the calendar year,” the WMATA resolution reads. “During this period, the board will review what role such issue-oriented advertising has in WMATA’s mission to deliver safe, equitable, and reliable transportation services to the Nation’s Capital, and will seek public comment and participation for its consideration before making a final policy determination.”
Stessel says Geller’s name never came up in the discussion leading up to the ad ban, but the Washington Post‘s Paul Duggan reports that her planned ads gave at least one member of Metro’s board a fright.
This would hardly be the first time Geller has provoked a change in Metro’s advertising policy. In 2012, the transit agency refused to post billboards by her group, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, that featured Koran verses accompanied by photographs of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Geller sued, and a judge ordered the transit agency that it could not decline ads based on their political stripes; Metro attached disclaimers to political ads following the ruling.
Although political ads make up a significant portion of Metro’s advertising revenue, overall ad sales are a puny segment of the cash-strapped transit agency’s budget. Metro’s projected ad revenue for the current fiscal year—calculated long before this decision—is just $20 million, compared to $48 million in parking fees and $835 million in passenger fares. There is no word yet on how much of a financial toll will come from cutting out political ads.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People of 2025
Stumpy Stans Can Now Preorder a Bobblehead of the Beloved Tree
Johnson Says Congress Will Fix DC’s Budget Eventually, Pete Hegseth Used Signal More Than We Thought, and Locals Won Pulitzers
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
Trump Fires Librarian of Congress, Fox News Host to Be Next Top DC Prosecutor, Possibly Rabid Actual Fox Terrorizes Arlington
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
DC Might Be Getting a Watergate Museum
DC-Area Universities Are Offering Trump Classes This Fall
Should the Park Service End Rock Creek Parkway’s Reversible Lanes?
Viral DC-Area Food Truck Flavor Hive Has It in the Bag
More from News & Politics
This Pop-Up Museum Is All About the Teenage Experience
Jeanine Pirro: 5 Things to Know About the Fox News Host Trump Picked to Be DC’s Top Prosecutor
Trump Fires Librarian of Congress, Fox News Host to Be Next Top DC Prosecutor, Possibly Rabid Actual Fox Terrorizes Arlington
9 Embassies to Check Out During the EU Open Houses This Weekend
Trump Yanks Ed Martin’s Nomination
“Les Miz” Castmembers Plan Boycott of Trump Appearance, Ed Martin Wants to Jail a Guy for Trespassing on Federal Property, and We Found Some Swell Turkish Food
DC Might Be Getting a Watergate Museum
The Ultimate Guide on How to Date in DC