New York Stock Exchange head Richard Grasso was fired in 2003, then sued by then–New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer, who demanded that he not keep an “excessive” $190-million pay package. To defend himself, Grasso skipped over the big New York law firms and hired Washington’s Williams & Connolly.
New York lawyers haven’t fared that well in Washington’s courts, so it was a gamble to bring litigators Brendan Sullivan and Gerson Zweifach to Manhattan in a case that was New York to its core.
But in July, after nearly five years of motions, depositions, hearings, appeals, and bench trials, Williams & Connolly was victorious. The state’s Court of Appeals threw out most of the former attorney general’s claims, and Spitzer successor Andrew Cuomo has abandoned the case, allowing Grasso to keep the money.
When Grasso hired the DC firm—one of the biggest without a New York office—it was with the intent that first chair in the case would go to Sullivan, widely regarded as the nation’s top corporate-defense attorney.
But Sullivan’s conflict with another high-profile case—that of former Cendant CEO Walter Forbes—moved Zweifach to the fore and Sullivan to the background. Some conspiracists suspected that friendly prosecutors in Connecticut timed their case to neutralize Sullivan in New York’s Grasso case. If so, the move backfired.
Grasso showed faith in Zweifach, 11 years younger than Sullivan, comparing the lawyer change to replacing one Hall of Fame pitcher, Cy Young, with another, Warren Spahn.
In the New York case, Zweifach proved a tenacious foe on whether the case should be in state or federal court, whether it should be heard by a judge or a jury, and whether the judge should be disqualified.
As often happens in cases involving Williams & Connolly, the case ended with the original prosecutor’s reputation in tatters, while the defendant skipped out happily. Although there is no evidence that W&C had anything to do with Spitzer’s being outed as a user of a call-girl ring, some local attorneys smiled and said that something like that always seems to happen when Williams & Connolly is involved. “Contrary to urban legend, we had nothing to do with it,” Zweifach says.
New York’s decision to drop the case, while good for Grasso, is a mixed bag for Williams & Connolly. Because the firm bills by the hour rather than taking a percentage of any winnings, Cuomo’s decision marks the end of a five-year gravy train that took the full-time attention of Zweifach and a team of six associates, who each billed around $300 per hour. Zwiefach’s fees as a partner are around $875 per hour.
Even by conservative estimates, Zweifach and his team earned more than $20 million for the partners at the firm—from a client who ended up with plenty from which to pay.
This article first appeared in the August 2008 issue of The Washingtonian. For more articles like it, click here.
W&C Scores Big—Again
A five-year case for Williams & Connolly comes to an end—and with a big payout.
New York Stock Exchange head Richard Grasso was fired in 2003, then sued by then–New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer, who demanded that he not keep an “excessive” $190-million pay package. To defend himself, Grasso skipped over the big New York law firms and hired Washington’s Williams & Connolly.
New York lawyers haven’t fared that well in Washington’s courts, so it was a gamble to bring litigators Brendan Sullivan and Gerson Zweifach to Manhattan in a case that was New York to its core.
But in July, after nearly five years of motions, depositions, hearings, appeals, and bench trials, Williams & Connolly was victorious. The state’s Court of Appeals threw out most of the former attorney general’s claims, and Spitzer successor Andrew Cuomo has abandoned the case, allowing Grasso to keep the money.
When Grasso hired the DC firm—one of the biggest without a New York office—it was with the intent that first chair in the case would go to Sullivan, widely regarded as the nation’s top corporate-defense attorney.
But Sullivan’s conflict with another high-profile case—that of former Cendant CEO Walter Forbes—moved Zweifach to the fore and Sullivan to the background. Some conspiracists suspected that friendly prosecutors in Connecticut timed their case to neutralize Sullivan in New York’s Grasso case. If so, the move backfired.
Grasso showed faith in Zweifach, 11 years younger than Sullivan, comparing the lawyer change to replacing one Hall of Fame pitcher, Cy Young, with another, Warren Spahn.
In the New York case, Zweifach proved a tenacious foe on whether the case should be in state or federal court, whether it should be heard by a judge or a jury, and whether the judge should be disqualified.
As often happens in cases involving Williams & Connolly, the case ended with the original prosecutor’s reputation in tatters, while the defendant skipped out happily. Although there is no evidence that W&C had anything to do with Spitzer’s being outed as a user of a call-girl ring, some local attorneys smiled and said that something like that always seems to happen when Williams & Connolly is involved. “Contrary to urban legend, we had nothing to do with it,” Zweifach says.
New York’s decision to drop the case, while good for Grasso, is a mixed bag for Williams & Connolly. Because the firm bills by the hour rather than taking a percentage of any winnings, Cuomo’s decision marks the end of a five-year gravy train that took the full-time attention of Zweifach and a team of six associates, who each billed around $300 per hour. Zwiefach’s fees as a partner are around $875 per hour.
Even by conservative estimates, Zweifach and his team earned more than $20 million for the partners at the firm—from a client who ended up with plenty from which to pay.
This article first appeared in the August 2008 issue of The Washingtonian. For more articles like it, click here.
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Society Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Bans on Underage Vaping, Swastika Graffiti, Synthetic Dyes: New Virginia Laws Go Into Effect in July
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
Pardoned J6er Will Join Ed Martin’s Justice Department Office, Trump Outlines Hypothetical Alligator Escape Plan, and We Have Fireworks Show Recommendations
The “World’s Largest Outdoor Museum” Is Coming to DC. Here’s a Preview.
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut
The Commanders Wine and Dine DC Council Members; GOP Senator Suggests Tax Language Was “Airdropped” Into Spending Bill; and Trump Wants DOGE to Investigate Musk
100 Reasons to Love DC Right Now
How DC’s Attorney General Got So Good at Double Dutch
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair
For DNC Chair Ken Martin, the Big Beautiful Bill Is Personal