Dealing With the Emotional Trauma of This Week’s Events

Photograph of Dass-Brailsford courtesy of Georgetown.

It has been a week of unusually traumatic news, with the Boston Marathon bombings
on Monday and the Texas fertilizer plant explosion Wednesday night. Both events were
sudden, unexpected, and led to deaths and injuries and heavy coverage in the news
media. While these events happened hundreds of miles away from Washington, the psychological
impact transcends the road map. In a post-9/11 culture, memories of past trauma can
be quickly revived by current events, prompting anxiety and the obvious questions:
Can it happen here? Could it happen to me or my loved ones? Dr.
Priscilla
Dass-Brailsford, a professor at Georgetown University Medical Center, says these reactions are normal
and expected. She admits even she, when her husband described to her the carnage in
Boston, said, “Stop, stop, I don’t want to hear anymore.”

Dass-Brailsford, who did her undergraduate work in South Africa and received her graduate
degrees at Boston College and Harvard, is a certified first responder, ready to provide
immediate crisis intervention and counseling should an emergency happen in the Washington
area. She performed this role in New Orleans in the first week after Hurricane Katrina
and on 9/11. She came to Georgetown University in 2008. We talked on Thursday morning
about the general emotional impact of this week’s news.

Do you view this week as having an unusual impact on the public?

Of course. What happened is tragic and unbelievable, and it took people out of their
comfort zones.

Were we significantly in our comfort zones?

After Osama bin Laden was captured, even though there is still high security at airports,
at some level people began to let their guard down. That’s a natural human tendency
to do that. Time tends to allow people to get comfortable. The other issue is that
no one in their wildest dreams would have expected something like this at a marathon.

What is the impact of something happening unexpectedly at a seemingly not-vulnerable
event like a marathon?

What made this different is because of the place, a marathon. Most of the [terror]
incidents have happened at airports, military installations, on transportation, or
at institutions. At schools, at institutions, people entered the building and then
attacked. This was just an open space; people were watching an event. It terrorizes
more than something you would expect to have happen in the sense that when you look
at the definition of PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] it is an event that is
unexpected and causes intense fear and helplessness, and that’s exactly what this
incident did.

Would this have more in common with the shootings in the Aurora, Colorado, movie theater?

Yes. People went to the marathon with the intention of being entertained. No one thought
that day, “Okay, I need to make sure I’m safe.” They went with their guard completely
down. I have watched the marathon for several years. There’s a lot of security, but
the security is to keep the crowds at bay. It’s a relaxed, pleasant event.

What are the normal emotional reactions to traumatic events in the news, whether it’s
the Boston bombings or the explosion in Texas?

People feel hopeless. Apathy. There’s a state of fear, of hyper-vigilance. It brings
back a lot of the stuff that happened with other big events, like 9/11, when the whole
nation was in a state of alert. The fact that no one has been arrested adds to the
feelings of tension, anxiety, and fear, so people won’t sleep well. And for people
who have already experienced traumatic events [firsthand]—for example, the military—it
all comes back, and no one feels safe.

But it’s normal to have these feelings?

Absolutely. These symptoms, while troubling, are normal reactions after an event like
Boston.

What’s not normal?

When it persists for more than a month or two. Not having a reaction is a reaction,
too. It means shock and numbness.

What about area runners who were in Boston for the race, whether at the blast site
or not?

They could have a delayed reaction, even if not at the blast. You could also be someone
who runs regularly and not at the race but thinking about qualifying for a race in
the future. It’s a natural reaction to say, “That could have been me.”

It’s the hardest for the people who were in the immediate vicinity. We hope they are
getting counseling. Some people might think they don’t need it. Talking about it helps.
Talking about it with other people who may have been there would help. Events like
this tend to bring the victims together in an interesting way, because they share
in the experience and have a shared traumatic experience as a result.

What is the impact of watching the images on television, especially seeing the same
gruesome images often?

People have a natural curiosity to watch television, but we can’t control the images
that are shown to us. Some people watch the same thing over and over, and at some
level it gets normalized for them. It is very unhealthy to do that. Don’t watch it.
Read something, where you have more control over the images.

How do people going forward deal with the anxiety of watching a marathon or being
along any parade route?

Some people will just not do it. Most people are going to be afraid to be in open
spaces, among large crowds. It will cross their minds that “this is a potential place
to be bombed.” That’s how people in a country where there’s a lot of political upheaval
live on a regular basis. Feeling vulnerable, feeling threatened—these are natural
feelings that will be around for a little while until these people [responsible for
the bombing] are caught, and then there is some closure and distance.

Catching the bomber or bombers will have a significant impact?

If no one is caught, people are left with a lack of closure and a feeling that their
life is in danger, because there’s someone out there capable of killing. When trauma
happens that is an important aspect: Here’s the person who did it. Then they can begin
to recover. People like closure.

Carol Ross Joynt