When people spoke on the phone with former DC Council member Michael A. Brown several months ago, there was someone else on the line: the feds. The FBI is in the process of notifying people who chatted with Brown between last October and January that their calls were picked up as part of a wiretap during an investigation that led Brown to plead guilty in June to bribery charges.
Among those on whom the FBI eavesdropped: a few local reporters. WUSA9’s Bruce Johnson and then-Washington City Paper reporter Alan Suderman were among those who received letters this week from US Attorney Ron Machen‘s office letting them know agents were listening in.
“During the period of authorized interception, wire and/or electronic communications to or from your phone were intercepted,” the letter reads. Justice Department rules regarding surveillance offer a greater level of scrutiny to communications by journalists, though in this case, Brown was the one being investigated.
Brown pleaded guilty in June to accepting $55,000 in bribes, including $10,000 in cash delivered in a coffee mug.
But in learning that federal agents were dropping in on his calls with Brown, who lost his bid last year for another term on the DC Council, WUSA9’s Johnson is worried that other sources will be scared off. “I’m not going to be surprised if I call someone at some point in the near future and they say ‘I can’t talk to you because the FBI might be listening’,” Johnson told his station yesterday.
In a statement, Machen’s office says that the wiretap, which ran from Oct. 3 to Jan. 27, did pick up some of Brown’s calls not directly tied into the bribery investigation, but that agents attempted to limit that effect. “Significantly, law enforcement utilized procedures to minimize and reduce to the smallest possible number the amount of innocent and non-pertinent communications that were intercepted between individuals and the target of its investigations,” the statement reads.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
FBI Tells Local Reporters It Was Listening in on Phone Calls With Former DC Council Member
At least one journalist whose calls were picked up is worried other sources will be scared to get on the phone.
When people spoke on the phone with former DC Council member Michael A. Brown several months ago, there was someone else on the line: the feds. The FBI is in the process of notifying people who chatted with Brown between last October and January that their calls were picked up as part of a wiretap during an investigation that led Brown to plead guilty in June to bribery charges.
Among those on whom the FBI eavesdropped: a few local reporters. WUSA9’s Bruce Johnson and then-Washington City Paper reporter Alan Suderman were among those who received letters this week from US Attorney Ron Machen‘s office letting them know agents were listening in.
“During the period of authorized interception, wire and/or electronic communications to or from your phone were intercepted,” the letter reads. Justice Department rules regarding surveillance offer a greater level of scrutiny to communications by journalists, though in this case, Brown was the one being investigated.
Brown pleaded guilty in June to accepting $55,000 in bribes, including $10,000 in cash delivered in a coffee mug.
But in learning that federal agents were dropping in on his calls with Brown, who lost his bid last year for another term on the DC Council, WUSA9’s Johnson is worried that other sources will be scared off. “I’m not going to be surprised if I call someone at some point in the near future and they say ‘I can’t talk to you because the FBI might be listening’,” Johnson told his station yesterday.
In a statement, Machen’s office says that the wiretap, which ran from Oct. 3 to Jan. 27, did pick up some of Brown’s calls not directly tied into the bribery investigation, but that agents attempted to limit that effect. “Significantly, law enforcement utilized procedures to minimize and reduce to the smallest possible number the amount of innocent and non-pertinent communications that were intercepted between individuals and the target of its investigations,” the statement reads.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People of 2023
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People
In the Early 1900s, Albino African-American Brothers Were Stolen From Their Virginia Home to Be Circus Performers. This Is Their Story.
Here’s What It’s Like to Compete on Netflix’s “Dance Monsters”
Dan About Town: The Best of Bashes, Balls, and Benefits This Past April
Washingtonian Magazine
June 2023: Best of Washington
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
A New Women’s-History Board Game Has People Talking
People Are Talking About These DC Fashion Designers
Will This New Federal Agency Finally Cure Cancer?
A Memorial to Fallen Journalists Is One Step Closer to Happening on the National Mall
More from News & Politics
This Community Garden Will Be Gone Soon. The People It Brought Together Are Okay With That.
Dan About Town: The Best of Bashes, Balls, and Benefits This Past April
James Comey Explains Why He’s Not a Catty Bitch Who Lives for Drama
There Are Now Baby Meerkats at the National Zoo
George Washington University Has a New Nickname: The Revolutionaries
The Overdue Return of Indie-Rock Greats Velocity Girl
A Maryland Artist Turned Jamie Raskin’s Bandannas Into a Collage
Bad News: Mosquito Season Is Getting Longer