When people spoke on the phone with former DC Council member Michael A. Brown several months ago, there was someone else on the line: the feds. The FBI is in the process of notifying people who chatted with Brown between last October and January that their calls were picked up as part of a wiretap during an investigation that led Brown to plead guilty in June to bribery charges.
Among those on whom the FBI eavesdropped: a few local reporters. WUSA9’s Bruce Johnson and then-Washington City Paper reporter Alan Suderman were among those who received letters this week from US Attorney Ron Machen‘s office letting them know agents were listening in.
“During the period of authorized interception, wire and/or electronic communications to or from your phone were intercepted,” the letter reads. Justice Department rules regarding surveillance offer a greater level of scrutiny to communications by journalists, though in this case, Brown was the one being investigated.
Brown pleaded guilty in June to accepting $55,000 in bribes, including $10,000 in cash delivered in a coffee mug.
But in learning that federal agents were dropping in on his calls with Brown, who lost his bid last year for another term on the DC Council, WUSA9’s Johnson is worried that other sources will be scared off. “I’m not going to be surprised if I call someone at some point in the near future and they say ‘I can’t talk to you because the FBI might be listening’,” Johnson told his station yesterday.
In a statement, Machen’s office says that the wiretap, which ran from Oct. 3 to Jan. 27, did pick up some of Brown’s calls not directly tied into the bribery investigation, but that agents attempted to limit that effect. “Significantly, law enforcement utilized procedures to minimize and reduce to the smallest possible number the amount of innocent and non-pertinent communications that were intercepted between individuals and the target of its investigations,” the statement reads.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
FBI Tells Local Reporters It Was Listening in on Phone Calls With Former DC Council Member
At least one journalist whose calls were picked up is worried other sources will be scared to get on the phone.
When people spoke on the phone with former DC Council member Michael A. Brown several months ago, there was someone else on the line: the feds. The FBI is in the process of notifying people who chatted with Brown between last October and January that their calls were picked up as part of a wiretap during an investigation that led Brown to plead guilty in June to bribery charges.
Among those on whom the FBI eavesdropped: a few local reporters. WUSA9’s Bruce Johnson and then-Washington City Paper reporter Alan Suderman were among those who received letters this week from US Attorney Ron Machen‘s office letting them know agents were listening in.
“During the period of authorized interception, wire and/or electronic communications to or from your phone were intercepted,” the letter reads. Justice Department rules regarding surveillance offer a greater level of scrutiny to communications by journalists, though in this case, Brown was the one being investigated.
Brown pleaded guilty in June to accepting $55,000 in bribes, including $10,000 in cash delivered in a coffee mug.
But in learning that federal agents were dropping in on his calls with Brown, who lost his bid last year for another term on the DC Council, WUSA9’s Johnson is worried that other sources will be scared off. “I’m not going to be surprised if I call someone at some point in the near future and they say ‘I can’t talk to you because the FBI might be listening’,” Johnson told his station yesterday.
In a statement, Machen’s office says that the wiretap, which ran from Oct. 3 to Jan. 27, did pick up some of Brown’s calls not directly tied into the bribery investigation, but that agents attempted to limit that effect. “Significantly, law enforcement utilized procedures to minimize and reduce to the smallest possible number the amount of innocent and non-pertinent communications that were intercepted between individuals and the target of its investigations,” the statement reads.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Bans on Underage Vaping, Swastika Graffiti, Synthetic Dyes: New Virginia Laws Go Into Effect in July
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
“Mean Mugging” at Ward 8 Candidate Forum Leads to Arrest
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
More from News & Politics
Pardoned J6er Will Join Ed Martin’s Justice Department Office, Trump Outlines Hypothetical Alligator Escape Plan, and We Have Fireworks Show Recommendations
The “World’s Largest Outdoor Museum” Is Coming to DC. Here’s a Preview.
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut
The Commanders Wine and Dine DC Council Members; GOP Senator Suggests Tax Language Was “Airdropped” Into Spending Bill; and Trump Wants DOGE to Investigate Musk
100 Reasons to Love DC Right Now
How DC’s Attorney General Got So Good at Double Dutch
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair
For DNC Chair Ken Martin, the Big Beautiful Bill Is Personal