Photograph courtesy office of Representative Darrell Issa.
After a year of studies and proposals by the District government and the National Capital Planning Commission about whether to modify the Height Act that limits how tall buildings in DC can go, Congress intends to move fairly quickly on the matter, with the first hearing expected just a few weeks from now.
The House Oversight Committee is likely to schedule a hearing on changes to the Height Act in early December, says Ali Ahmad, a spokesman for Chairman Darrell Issa, a California Republican.
Issa, who has shown himself to be a strong ally for the District’s interests since taking over the committee in 2011, asked the District and the NCPC last year to come up with suggestions about modernizing the Height Act, a 1910 statute, that feels painfully outmoded for a city with an expanding population and rising housing costs.
The NCPC is set to approve its final recommendations, which would leave the Height Act virtually unchanged, at a meeting later today. DC’s proposal, developed by Director of Planning Harriet Tregoning, calls for allowing slightly taller buildings downtown and no caps on building heights in a few designated pockets with high population growth. The studies will be submitted to Issa’s committee later this week.
Issa’s hastiness in scheduling hearings should come as a relief to proponents of changing the Height Act. His leadership of the Oversight Committee expires at the end of 2014, and other Republicans on the panel who might succeed him have not shown the same interest he has in the District’s affairs. (At least not those that don’t involve anti-abortion bills.)
But Issa won’t get the proposals he requested until one more lengthy public hearing today featuring a witness list people who want to leave the Height Act as it is. And the DC Council today came out near-unanimously in opposition to relaxing the law when Chairman Phil Mendelson introduced a ceremonial resolution opposing changes to the Height Act, even those that would give the DC Council control over building heights. Marion Barry was the only Council member who did not sign on as a co-sponsor.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Congress Plans to Move Quickly on Height Act Changes
Capitol Hill hearings on whether to allow taller buildings in DC will likely begin in early December.
After a year of studies and proposals by the District government and the National Capital Planning Commission about whether to modify the Height Act that limits how tall buildings in DC can go, Congress intends to move fairly quickly on the matter, with the first hearing expected just a few weeks from now.
The House Oversight Committee is likely to schedule a hearing on changes to the Height Act in early December, says Ali Ahmad, a spokesman for Chairman Darrell Issa, a California Republican.
Issa, who has shown himself to be a strong ally for the District’s interests since taking over the committee in 2011, asked the District and the NCPC last year to come up with suggestions about modernizing the Height Act, a 1910 statute, that feels painfully outmoded for a city with an expanding population and rising housing costs.
The NCPC is set to approve its final recommendations, which would leave the Height Act virtually unchanged, at a meeting later today. DC’s proposal, developed by Director of Planning Harriet Tregoning, calls for allowing slightly taller buildings downtown and no caps on building heights in a few designated pockets with high population growth. The studies will be submitted to Issa’s committee later this week.
Issa’s hastiness in scheduling hearings should come as a relief to proponents of changing the Height Act. His leadership of the Oversight Committee expires at the end of 2014, and other Republicans on the panel who might succeed him have not shown the same interest he has in the District’s affairs. (At least not those that don’t involve anti-abortion bills.)
But Issa won’t get the proposals he requested until one more lengthy public hearing today featuring a witness list people who want to leave the Height Act as it is. And the DC Council today came out near-unanimously in opposition to relaxing the law when Chairman Phil Mendelson introduced a ceremonial resolution opposing changes to the Height Act, even those that would give the DC Council control over building heights. Marion Barry was the only Council member who did not sign on as a co-sponsor.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Best of Washington 2023: Things to Eat, Drink, Do, and Know Right Now
“Shattered Glass”: An Oral History of the Media-Movie Cult Classic
Washingtonian Magazine
December 2023: Ways to Relax and Feel Better Now
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
29 of the Best Things to Eat and Drink Around DC in 2023
29 of the Best Things to Do Around DC in 2023
16 of the Best Things to Know Around DC in 2023
Reader Picks: 26 Local Favorites Around DC in 2023
More from News & Politics
PHOTOS: The Washington Post Goes on Strike
Meet the Winner of Netflix’s Real-Life ‘Squid Game’
Let’s Talk About the DC Bar That Now Has a Hot Tub
Restaurants vs. Diners, Psychedelic Therapy, and the Spy House Next Door: Washingtonian’s Best Longreads of 2023
“We Have Nothing in the Cupboard”: Washington Post Manager Begs for Content Ahead of Strike
Washington Post Staffers Will Go on Strike Thursday
We Baked All of the 2023 NYT Holiday Cookies
How a Local Doctor Is Using Tech to Try to Save Lives