The plot of federal land where the Eisenhower Memorial is slated to be built. Photograph by Carol Ross Joynt.
The seemingly endless pursuit to build a viable memorial to President Dwight D. Eisenhower near the Mall took a new turn on Thursday as Gehry Partners, whose controversial design has pleased no one with the power to approve it, proposed a “significant change” that, they hoped, would finally allow the project to go forward.
The new proposal eliminates two of the metal tapestries that would enclose part of the park-like arrangement, leaving only the large tapestry that spans the rear of the site.
“Since we were here in April, we’ve worked hard to meet the planning goals of the Commission as set forth in the last meeting,” Gehry architect Craig Webb told the gathered members of the National Capital Planning Commission. He said the architectural team has been “working with” the NCPC staff and presented to them “several different design ideas.” Only the one was presented at the meeting.
Other smaller changes include moving two supporting columns and modifications to the landscaping at the four-acre site on Independence Avenue in a wedge between the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Education Department, the FAA, and the William J. Cohen Federal Building.
Webb said this revision was intended not to take a “radical” direction” but “to move forward with this project to honor Eisenhower.”
That sentiment was seconded by commission member Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Relations, but with a further, “out-of-the-box” suggestion to build the memorial “sans the tapestries.”
“I would not want to lose the Gehry design as it is forever, but at the same time we have an obligation, after 15 years, to get this thing going,” Webb said, adding that this plan could also augment a “staged” fundraising effort.
Issa, who visited the memorial site before Thursday’s meeting, also observed that, at this point, “a toilet facility would be an improvement” of the “blighted” plot of land.
The presentation was informational only, and there was no vote by the NCPC members. That will come later after staff have analyzed the proposals.
The Incredible Shrinking Eisenhower Memorial
A proposed “significant change” to the design would eliminate two controversial tapestries.
The seemingly endless pursuit to build a viable memorial to President Dwight D. Eisenhower near the Mall took a new turn on Thursday as Gehry Partners, whose controversial design has pleased no one with the power to approve it, proposed a “significant change” that, they hoped, would finally allow the project to go forward.
The new proposal eliminates two of the metal tapestries that would enclose part of the park-like arrangement, leaving only the large tapestry that spans the rear of the site.
“Since we were here in April, we’ve worked hard to meet the planning goals of the Commission as set forth in the last meeting,” Gehry architect Craig Webb told the gathered members of the National Capital Planning Commission. He said the architectural team has been “working with” the NCPC staff and presented to them “several different design ideas.” Only the one was presented at the meeting.
Other smaller changes include moving two supporting columns and modifications to the landscaping at the four-acre site on Independence Avenue in a wedge between the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Education Department, the FAA, and the William J. Cohen Federal Building.
Webb said this revision was intended not to take a “radical” direction” but “to move forward with this project to honor Eisenhower.”
That sentiment was seconded by commission member Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Relations, but with a further, “out-of-the-box” suggestion to build the memorial “sans the tapestries.”
“I would not want to lose the Gehry design as it is forever, but at the same time we have an obligation, after 15 years, to get this thing going,” Webb said, adding that this plan could also augment a “staged” fundraising effort.
Issa, who visited the memorial site before Thursday’s meeting, also observed that, at this point, “a toilet facility would be an improvement” of the “blighted” plot of land.
The presentation was informational only, and there was no vote by the NCPC members. That will come later after staff have analyzed the proposals.
Find Carol Ross Joynt on Twitter at @caroljoynt.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
Bans on Underage Vaping, Swastika Graffiti, Synthetic Dyes: New Virginia Laws Go Into Effect in July
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
Kings Dominion’s Wild New Coaster Takes Flight in Virginia
More from News & Politics
Speaker Johnson’s Megabill Prayers Likely to Be Answered Before Holiday Weekend, Wrongly Deported Maryland Man Faced Abuse in El Salvador Prison, and We Found Some Yummy Nepalese Food
Pardoned J6er Will Join Ed Martin’s Justice Department Office, Trump Outlines Hypothetical Alligator Escape Plan, and We Have Fireworks Show Recommendations
The “World’s Largest Outdoor Museum” Is Coming to DC. Here’s a Preview.
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut
The Commanders Wine and Dine DC Council Members; GOP Senator Suggests Tax Language Was “Airdropped” Into Spending Bill; and Trump Wants DOGE to Investigate Musk
100 Reasons to Love DC Right Now
How DC’s Attorney General Got So Good at Double Dutch
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair