Thinking of cruising down Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, during the middle of the day? Think again, because there will probably be close to 1,000 taxicabs in your way.
A caravan of taxi drivers, ticked off that the DC Council is poised to give a wide berth to transportation apps like Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar, plans to drive up to Freedom Plaza and blockade Pennsylvania Avenue to demand that drivers who work through the apps be subject to the same stringent regulations cabbies have to obey. The demonstration is a repeat of one in June, when more than 1,000 drivers clogged the roads around the John A. Wilson Building and brought midday traffic to a standstill.
The gas-guzzling protest is being organized by Teamsters Local 922, which oversees an association of more than 2,000 cabbies. Taxi drivers say their earnings have plummeted by as much as 30 percent in the past year as the popularity of so-called “ride-sharing” apps like Uber and Lyft, which set their rates well below the city-mandated taxi fares, has risen. But they might not want to expect much out of today’s show of force, other than befuddled bystanders and suddenly aggravated motorists and cyclists. The bill sanctioning the ride-sharing apps passed its first Council vote yesterday by an 11-0 margin and seems guaranteed to win its final vote later this month.
The bill, introduced by Council members Mary Cheh and David Grosso, requires companies like Uber and Lyft to insure their drivers with $1 million insurance policies, conduct criminal background checks, and issue decals or hood adornments to their affiliated cars—largely codifying steps the companies already say they take. Even Uber, which is famously tetchy about government intervention, is willfully on board with this one.
“We applaud Councilmembers Cheh and Grosso for their leadership in moving legislation forward that embraces more options and opportunity for Washingtonians,” an Uber spokesman said in an e-mailed statement.
Grosso dismissed the June taxi caravan as a “bullying tactic.”
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Taxi Drivers Are Going to Take Over Pennsylvania Avenue at Lunch on Wednesday
Thinking of cruising down Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, during the middle of the day? Think again, because there will probably be close to 1,000 taxicabs in your way.
A caravan of taxi drivers, ticked off that the DC Council is poised to give a wide berth to transportation apps like Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar, plans to drive up to Freedom Plaza and blockade Pennsylvania Avenue to demand that drivers who work through the apps be subject to the same stringent regulations cabbies have to obey. The demonstration is a repeat of one in June, when more than 1,000 drivers clogged the roads around the John A. Wilson Building and brought midday traffic to a standstill.
The gas-guzzling protest is being organized by Teamsters Local 922, which oversees an association of more than 2,000 cabbies. Taxi drivers say their earnings have plummeted by as much as 30 percent in the past year as the popularity of so-called “ride-sharing” apps like Uber and Lyft, which set their rates well below the city-mandated taxi fares, has risen. But they might not want to expect much out of today’s show of force, other than befuddled bystanders and suddenly aggravated motorists and cyclists. The bill sanctioning the ride-sharing apps passed its first Council vote yesterday by an 11-0 margin and seems guaranteed to win its final vote later this month.
The bill, introduced by Council members Mary Cheh and David Grosso, requires companies like Uber and Lyft to insure their drivers with $1 million insurance policies, conduct criminal background checks, and issue decals or hood adornments to their affiliated cars—largely codifying steps the companies already say they take. Even Uber, which is famously tetchy about government intervention, is willfully on board with this one.
“We applaud Councilmembers Cheh and Grosso for their leadership in moving legislation forward that embraces more options and opportunity for Washingtonians,” an Uber spokesman said in an e-mailed statement.
Grosso dismissed the June taxi caravan as a “bullying tactic.”
Find Benjamin Freed on Twitter at @brfreed.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Editors' Picks
Is DC Being Too Mean to Louise Linton?
Which Washington-Area Neighborhoods Will Boom Next?
Why This Is the Golden Age of DC Grocery Shopping
The Ultimate Guide to DC’s Cherry Blossoms
April 2018: How 14th Street Came Back
Subscribe
More from News
Why Did We Put Funny Hats on Trump, RBG, and Bryce Harper?
PHOTOS: DC’s Cherry Blossoms Bring Out the Photographers
“The McLaughlin Group” Is Back. Can It Find a Way To Be Relevant?
This DC Wharf Restaurant Called the Police on a Diner For Alleged Hostile Behavior. She Says It Was a Racial Issue.
Why DC Police Are Studying Critical Race Theory
Here’s How You Can Buy James Comey’s Book in Person Tuesday
Even DC’s Street Names Are Political
Which Washington-Area Neighborhoods Will Boom Next?
Most Popular
Toast Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Nuptials at DC’s Royal Wedding-Themed Pop-Up Bar
This DC Wharf Restaurant Called the Police on a Diner For Alleged Hostile Behavior. She Says It Was a Racial Issue.
Which Washington-Area Neighborhoods Will Boom Next?
The 100 Very Best Restaurants in Washington
The Bride’s Custom Lihi Hod Gown at This Eastern Shore Wedding is Perfection