On August 6, Baier will police ten debaters and a real-time Facebook feed. Photograph by Andrew Propp.
By inviting only the ten top-polling candidates in the crowded GOP field to participate in the first Republican primary debate, Fox News has made the August 6 event, cohosted with Facebook, controversial before it starts (ten is the most candidates ever onstage, but the Republican field now numbers 16). We asked Fox anchor Bret Baier, who is moderating along with Chris Wallace and Megyn Kelly, about his debate prep.
Is it harder to knock politicians off their talking points in a group setting?
A lot tougher. Not to give away trade secrets, but you’ve got to absorb some of the talking points into the question: “Understanding that you feel X,Y, and Z….” You take it off the table at the beginning.
You love presenting candidates with their previous statements.
Yeah, that’s my question style. Which is Tim Russert’s question style. That’s a guy that I really looked up to as far as how to frame things.
What’s a bigger motivation: making good television or doing a debate that’s best for democracy? Sometimes the best TV moments—Lloyd Bentsen telling Dan Quayle, “You’re no Jack Kennedy”—are awesome TV, but they don’t tell us much about the race.
Well, that particular debate dealt with the gravitas question of Dan Quayle. And it opened a vulnerability that he overcame in the race.
You remembered that pretty quickly. Are you a student of debates?
Oh, yeah, very much. You look back across the years and some of those moments have framed whole races. Reagan/Mondale. Or Reagan/Carter—“There you go again.”
How do you work up your questions?
The worst are the ones that are rambling and have a preamble, which gives politicians an off-ramp: They hear something in a question to say, “Oh, well, there it is”—exit stage left here. So you try and keep them short and tight.
What kind of information do you get through your earpiece?
We’ll have a team fact-checking on the fly. And we’ll also have interaction with the viewers through Facebook. Facebook has a lot of data that can tell you how broad swaths of people feel about an issue.
Fox is limiting participation in this debate to the top ten candidates in national polls [there could be more if candidates are tied]. That means a candidate who is doing well in the first primary states but not nationally could end up in the second place debate, which will air earlier.
So our answer to that is couplefold. One is, it’s the most candidates on stage ever. Two is the debate’s in Ohio and it’s a national debate–we’re a national network. And three is, we’re going to have a debate in Iowa right before the caucuses. And they may have different criteria for that.
Do you have a specific plan for Donald Trump?
We’ll deal with Trump like any other candidate. Everyone will know the rules—and we’ll enforce them.
Do you have any input into the debate’s wrap-up sound? One of the ones you used in 2011 sounded like an instant- message alert.
I remember this discussion. We were trying to get something that was a forward-leaning, kind of high-tech vibe, and I just don’t think it worked.
Andrew Beaujon joined Washingtonian in late 2014. He was previously with the Poynter Institute, TBD.com, and Washington City Paper. He lives in Del Ray.
Bret Baier Has a Plan for Moderating Donald Trump
"Everyone will know the rules," the Fox News anchor says.
By inviting only the ten top-polling candidates in the crowded GOP field to participate in the first Republican primary debate, Fox News has made the August 6 event, cohosted with Facebook, controversial before it starts (ten is the most candidates ever onstage, but the Republican field now numbers 16). We asked Fox anchor Bret Baier, who is moderating along with Chris Wallace and Megyn Kelly, about his debate prep.
Is it harder to knock politicians off their talking points in a group setting?
A lot tougher. Not to give away trade secrets, but you’ve got to absorb some of the talking points into the question: “Understanding that you feel X,Y, and Z….” You take it off the table at the beginning.
You love presenting candidates with their previous statements.
Yeah, that’s my question style. Which is Tim Russert’s question style. That’s a guy that I really looked up to as far as how to frame things.
What’s a bigger motivation: making good television or doing a debate that’s best for democracy? Sometimes the best TV moments—Lloyd Bentsen telling Dan Quayle, “You’re no Jack Kennedy”—are awesome TV, but they don’t tell us much about the race.
Well, that particular debate dealt with the gravitas question of Dan Quayle. And it opened a vulnerability that he overcame in the race.
You remembered that pretty quickly. Are you a student of debates?
Oh, yeah, very much. You look back across the years and some of those moments have framed whole races. Reagan/Mondale. Or Reagan/Carter—“There you go again.”
How do you work up your questions?
The worst are the ones that are rambling and have a preamble, which gives politicians an off-ramp: They hear something in a question to say, “Oh, well, there it is”—exit stage left here. So you try and keep them short and tight.
What kind of information do you get through your earpiece?
We’ll have a team fact-checking on the fly. And we’ll also have interaction with the viewers through Facebook. Facebook has a lot of data that can tell you how broad swaths of people feel about an issue.
Fox is limiting participation in this debate to the top ten candidates in national polls [there could be more if candidates are tied]. That means a candidate who is doing well in the first primary states but not nationally could end up in the second place debate, which will air earlier.
So our answer to that is couplefold. One is, it’s the most candidates on stage ever. Two is the debate’s in Ohio and it’s a national debate–we’re a national network. And three is, we’re going to have a debate in Iowa right before the caucuses. And they may have different criteria for that.
Do you have a specific plan for Donald Trump?
We’ll deal with Trump like any other candidate. Everyone will know the rules—and we’ll enforce them.
Do you have any input into the debate’s wrap-up sound? One of the ones you used in 2011 sounded like an instant- message alert.
I remember this discussion. We were trying to get something that was a forward-leaning, kind of high-tech vibe, and I just don’t think it worked.
Andrew Beaujon joined Washingtonian in late 2014. He was previously with the Poynter Institute, TBD.com, and Washington City Paper. He lives in Del Ray.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Best of Washington 2023: Things to Eat, Drink, Do, and Know Right Now
Washingtonian Magazine
October 2023: Best Brunches
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
29 of the Best Things to Eat and Drink Around DC in 2023
29 of the Best Things to Do Around DC in 2023
16 of the Best Things to Know Around DC in 2023
Reader Picks: 26 Local Favorites Around DC in 2023
More from News & Politics
MAP: Weekend Street Closures in Downtown DC
“Shattered Glass”: An Oral History of the Media-Movie Cult Classic
You Can Get Divorced—but Not Married—in DC During a Government Shutdown
Hattie McDaniel’s Historic Oscar Went Missing. Howard University Will Soon Get a Replacement.
Don’t Miss Thursday’s Harvest Moon—the Last Supermoon of 2023
Is It Time to Rethink DC’s Most Macabre Museum?
Dan About Town: The Best of Bashes, Balls, and Benefits This Past August and September
The US News College Rankings Are Out—but Do Area Schools Care?