Over the summer, the DC government released a draft of its Wildlife Action Plan, the first revamp to the document in a decade. It predictably includes sections about things like climate change and biodiversity, but among them—on page 145—is this assertion: “Cats (Felis catus) are non-native predators that have been among the worst invasive species globally.”
District cat advocates—and there are many—interpret the plan’s intentions as the equivalent of kitty doomsday.
The Washington Humane Society and other animal-welfare groups immediately circulated scathing PR materials. As a result, publications as far away as the UK’s Mirror—which referred to the American capital’s “possible scheme to kill the wild felines”—picked up the story. According to spokeswoman Julia Christian, the DC Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE), the agency that released the draft, has received upward of 12,000 critical e-mails.
Christian says the goal of publishing the document was to have an open dialogue with the public, but instead the ordeal has felt like “a cross between Parks and Recreation and a Christopher Guest movie.”
The wildlife plan, it should be noted, doesn’t literally advocate rounding up and killing outdoor cats. It calls for revisiting the District’s current practice of “trapping, neutering, and returning” (TNR) the animals to the streets—a means of controlling the feral feline population. But it also suggests that the captured cats instead be housed by shelters. This is the part that opponents say amounts to killing them, because feral animals—which are not socialized to humans and thus are essentially unadoptable—generally wind up euthanized by shelters.
For many Washingtonians, the debate over the animals is personal: Feral cats may not be conventional pets, but there are nonetheless thousands of volunteers caring for them throughout the city by providing food, clean water, and makeshift shelters. And even for run-of-the-mill cat owners, a report that puts your pet’s relatives on the same level as invasive predators of the less fluffy variety—such as snakehead fish and flatworms—can sound harsh.
Plus, the fight has deep roots in the District. After a multi-year push for the policy, TNR became the city’s official practice in 2008. The campaign was led in large part by the advocacy group Alley Cat Allies, founded 25 years ago as a two-woman operation in Adams Morgan and now an $8.8-million national nonprofit. Among other things, the organization established National Feral Cat Day and provides instructional videos about TNR.
The group has the crucial backing of the Washington Humane Society, which provides support for DC’s feral-cat caretakers, and provides the sterilization and vaccination services necessary for the program to work. (And according to the Humane Society, it has worked, with a 71-percent decrease in euthanization rates for its shelter cats and a 17-percent drop in intake of “free-roaming” cats, a sign that DC’s stray-cat population is decreasing.)
The reason for disrupting such an entrenched status quo is ironic: Folks on the other side of the issue want to protect animals, too—they just disagree about which ones. The four DOEE biologists who authored the draft wildlife plan say that “free-roaming” cats are leading predators of native species and kill as many as 4 billion birds and 22.3 billion “small mammals” nationally every year. (The draft doesn’t give DC-specific numbers.)
Christian, the DOEE spokeswoman, concedes that groups such as the Humane Society and Alley Cat Allies—both of which provided form letters for citizens to send to the city in protest—“won the messaging battle.” The biggest fight, however, is likely still to come. The draft plan is now subject to review by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Once that’s over—assuming the language about TNR survives—the real wrangling over what to do with DC’s feral cats will begin.
In other words, Christian should clean out her in box for another tidal wave of angry e-mails.
Animal Advocates Say DC Proposal Could Lead to Killing of Alley Cats
Over the summer, the DC government released a draft of its Wildlife Action Plan, the first revamp to the document in a decade. It predictably includes sections about things like climate change and biodiversity, but among them—on page 145—is this assertion: “Cats (Felis catus) are non-native predators that have been among the worst invasive species globally.”
District cat advocates—and there are many—interpret the plan’s intentions as the equivalent of kitty doomsday.
The Washington Humane Society and other animal-welfare groups immediately circulated scathing PR materials. As a result, publications as far away as the UK’s Mirror—which referred to the American capital’s “possible scheme to kill the wild felines”—picked up the story. According to spokeswoman Julia Christian, the DC Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE), the agency that released the draft, has received upward of 12,000 critical e-mails.
Christian says the goal of publishing the document was to have an open dialogue with the public, but instead the ordeal has felt like “a cross between Parks and Recreation and a Christopher Guest movie.”
The wildlife plan, it should be noted, doesn’t literally advocate rounding up and killing outdoor cats. It calls for revisiting the District’s current practice of “trapping, neutering, and returning” (TNR) the animals to the streets—a means of controlling the feral feline population. But it also suggests that the captured cats instead be housed by shelters. This is the part that opponents say amounts to killing them, because feral animals—which are not socialized to humans and thus are essentially unadoptable—generally wind up euthanized by shelters.
For many Washingtonians, the debate over the animals is personal: Feral cats may not be conventional pets, but there are nonetheless thousands of volunteers caring for them throughout the city by providing food, clean water, and makeshift shelters. And even for run-of-the-mill cat owners, a report that puts your pet’s relatives on the same level as invasive predators of the less fluffy variety—such as snakehead fish and flatworms—can sound harsh.
Plus, the fight has deep roots in the District. After a multi-year push for the policy, TNR became the city’s official practice in 2008. The campaign was led in large part by the advocacy group Alley Cat Allies, founded 25 years ago as a two-woman operation in Adams Morgan and now an $8.8-million national nonprofit. Among other things, the organization established National Feral Cat Day and provides instructional videos about TNR.
The group has the crucial backing of the Washington Humane Society, which provides support for DC’s feral-cat caretakers, and provides the sterilization and vaccination services necessary for the program to work. (And according to the Humane Society, it has worked, with a 71-percent decrease in euthanization rates for its shelter cats and a 17-percent drop in intake of “free-roaming” cats, a sign that DC’s stray-cat population is decreasing.)
The reason for disrupting such an entrenched status quo is ironic: Folks on the other side of the issue want to protect animals, too—they just disagree about which ones. The four DOEE biologists who authored the draft wildlife plan say that “free-roaming” cats are leading predators of native species and kill as many as 4 billion birds and 22.3 billion “small mammals” nationally every year. (The draft doesn’t give DC-specific numbers.)
Christian, the DOEE spokeswoman, concedes that groups such as the Humane Society and Alley Cat Allies—both of which provided form letters for citizens to send to the city in protest—“won the messaging battle.” The biggest fight, however, is likely still to come. The draft plan is now subject to review by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Once that’s over—assuming the language about TNR survives—the real wrangling over what to do with DC’s feral cats will begin.
In other words, Christian should clean out her in box for another tidal wave of angry e-mails.
Melanie D.G. Kaplan wrote about high-tech veterinarians in August. Her website is melaniedgkaplan.com.
This article appears in our November 2015 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Every Bus Line in DC Is Changing This Weekend. Here’s What to Know.
8 Takeaways From Usha Vance’s Interview With Meghan McCain
Yet Another Anti-Trump Statue Has Shown Up on the National Mall
Another Mysterious Anti-Trump Statue Has Appeared on the National Mall
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut
Washingtonian Magazine
July Issue: The "Best Of" Issue
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
How a Freedom Plaza Skate Kid Started a Prominent Dog-Walking Business
Did Television Begin in Dupont Circle?
More from News & Politics
Speaker Johnson’s Megabill Prayers Likely to Be Answered Before Holiday Weekend, Wrongly Deported Maryland Man Faced Abuse in El Salvador Prison, and We Found Some Yummy Nepalese Food
Pardoned J6er Will Join Ed Martin’s Justice Department Office, Trump Outlines Hypothetical Alligator Escape Plan, and We Have Fireworks Show Recommendations
The “World’s Largest Outdoor Museum” Is Coming to DC. Here’s a Preview.
A Cult Classic of Cannabis Brands Is Making Its DC Debut
The Commanders Wine and Dine DC Council Members; GOP Senator Suggests Tax Language Was “Airdropped” Into Spending Bill; and Trump Wants DOGE to Investigate Musk
100 Reasons to Love DC Right Now
How DC’s Attorney General Got So Good at Double Dutch
DC Council Ponders New Way to Expel Trayon White, the GOP’s Budget Bill Advances, and We Found You Some Tacos With Ethiopian Flair