Lucretia Williams, a researcher at Howard University, is regularly interviewed about her work, and she’s noticed that her quotes sometimes aren’t quite right (the “-ed” might get dropped from a word, for example). She attributes this issue to transcription technology, which—like all voice-recognition software—can struggle with Black speech. That’s a problem that she and her team are now trying to address. Williams has spent much of the past two years leading an effort to help voice-recognition technology better understand Black voices.
A partnership between Howard and Google, Project Elevate Black Voices, as it’s called, is an effort to broaden the data sets that teach software to recognize human speech. Black speech hasn’t traditionally been well represented, leading the systems to struggle with the unique grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary of African American English. The result is that Black speakers using voice-driven AI tools and other technologies often encounter responses like “I’m not sure I understand.” The idea for Project Elevate Black Voices was originally hatched by another Howard professor, Gloria Washington, and Google researcher Courtney Heldreth. (Google is funding the project.)
Tools like Siri and Amazon’s Alexa interpret and respond to commands like “Play Beyoncé,” but a 2020 study found that top-tier voice-interpretation systems have higher error rates for Black users than for white ones—a 22 percent gap for Apple, 15 percent for Amazon, and 12 percent for Google. Williams says this forces many Black Americans to address these pieces of technology in standard English. “You shouldn’t have to code-switch when you talk to your personal devices,” she says.
To help solve that issue, Williams and her team recruited more than 530 African Americans across 32 US states to participate. “Oftentimes, when research is done like this in vulnerable communities, the researchers get more out of it than the actual participants,” Williams says. In this case, participants received up to $599 for three weeks of answering questions, and the team is being careful with how it uses the material it has collected. The data is currently available only to Google and to historically Black colleges and universities that apply for access for specific projects. Howard is maintaining ownership in order to ensure that it isn’t misused in ways that would compromise privacy or otherwise harm participants.
As a result of all that collection effort, Project Elevate Black Voices has now created a data set of 600 hours of responses to questions like “What are your hobbies?” A Black-owned transcription company then processed all the recordings, and Google will use them to improve its offerings.
That’s just the first stage of the project, Williams says. The hope is to expand the data set to include additional dialects from across the African diaspora that are spoken in the United States. “When certain voices don’t get understood, it is a problem,” says Williams. “You shouldn’t have to feel excluded from the technologies that you use and pay for.”
How Howard University Is Helping Tech Understand Black Speech
Howard and Google teamed up to improve voice recognition.
Lucretia Williams, a researcher at Howard University, is regularly interviewed about her work, and she’s noticed that her quotes sometimes aren’t quite right (the “-ed” might get dropped from a word, for example). She attributes this issue to transcription technology, which—like all voice-recognition software—can struggle with Black speech. That’s a problem that she and her team are now trying to address. Williams has spent much of the past two years leading an effort to help voice-recognition technology better understand Black voices.
A partnership between Howard and Google, Project Elevate Black Voices, as it’s called, is an effort to broaden the data sets that teach software to recognize human speech. Black speech hasn’t traditionally been well represented, leading the systems to struggle with the unique grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary of African American English. The result is that Black speakers using voice-driven AI tools and other technologies often encounter responses like “I’m not sure I understand.” The idea for Project Elevate Black Voices was originally hatched by another Howard professor, Gloria Washington, and Google researcher Courtney Heldreth. (Google is funding the project.)
Tools like Siri and Amazon’s Alexa interpret and respond to commands like “Play Beyoncé,” but a 2020 study found that top-tier voice-interpretation systems have higher error rates for Black users than for white ones—a 22 percent gap for Apple, 15 percent for Amazon, and 12 percent for Google. Williams says this forces many Black Americans to address these pieces of technology in standard English. “You shouldn’t have to code-switch when you talk to your personal devices,” she says.
To help solve that issue, Williams and her team recruited more than 530 African Americans across 32 US states to participate. “Oftentimes, when research is done like this in vulnerable communities, the researchers get more out of it than the actual participants,” Williams says. In this case, participants received up to $599 for three weeks of answering questions, and the team is being careful with how it uses the material it has collected. The data is currently available only to Google and to historically Black colleges and universities that apply for access for specific projects. Howard is maintaining ownership in order to ensure that it isn’t misused in ways that would compromise privacy or otherwise harm participants.
As a result of all that collection effort, Project Elevate Black Voices has now created a data set of 600 hours of responses to questions like “What are your hobbies?” A Black-owned transcription company then processed all the recordings, and Google will use them to improve its offerings.
That’s just the first stage of the project, Williams says. The hope is to expand the data set to include additional dialects from across the African diaspora that are spoken in the United States. “When certain voices don’t get understood, it is a problem,” says Williams. “You shouldn’t have to feel excluded from the technologies that you use and pay for.”
This article appears in the August 2025 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Maryland Bookstore Donates Proceeds From GOP Senator’s Book Sales to Immigrant Charity
Rax King’s New Essay Collection Celebrates the “Sloppy” Side of DC Culture
Congressman Proposes Renaming Entire Kennedy Center for Trump, Poll Says Most Americans Are Paying Attention to Epstein Story, and We Tell You Where to Get a Mahjong Game
Who Will Run for Eleanor Holmes Norton’s Seat? A Guide to the Candidates and Rumors.
Journalists Savor Prospect of Pete Hegseth Running for Office, Trump Wants a White House Ballroom, and Katie Ledecky Won Another World Title
Washingtonian Magazine
August Issue: Best Burgers
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Need to Know What Time It Is? 6 Places to Find a Sundial Around DC.
How Would a New DC Stadium Compare to the Last One?
Meet the DC Tech CEO With a Flip Phone and No Social Media
The Culture of Lacrosse Is More Complex Than People Think
More from News & Politics
RFK Jr. Taught America How to Make a Smoothie
Statue of Traitor to Be Reinstalled in DC; We’re Going to Build a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon, Apparently; and Maybe You Would Enjoy a County Fair
PHOTOS: The Panda Bao Li Turned Four Today. The National Zoo Threw Him a Party.
It’s a Weird Time to Be a Seed Oil Lobbyist
Jeanine Pirro Takes Job at Office Without Free Bottled Water, Smithsonian Says It Will Once Again Acknowledge Trump’s Impeachments, and Joe Biden Got More Ice Cream
Is the RFK Stadium Deal Finally Done?
What Happens With Restaurant Service Fees Now?
Maryland Bookstore Donates Proceeds From GOP Senator’s Book Sales to Immigrant Charity