I would like to receive the following free email newsletters:

Newsletter Signup
  1. Bridal Party
  2. Dining Out
  3. Kliman Online
  4. Photo Ops
  5. Shop Around
  6. Where & When
  7. Well+Being
  8. Learn more
Fenty vs. Gray: Who Should Run DC?
Having trouble choosing a Mayoral candidate? Harry Jaffe breaks down the decision. By Harry Jaffe
Comments () | Published August 23, 2010

This article appears in the September 2010 issue of Washingtonian. 

Four years ago, Adrian Fenty was the kid mayor elected in a landslide to whip DC’s lethargic government into a sleek machine—in his image as a triathlete. And in some ways he did. But in the process he lost the love of voters who had come to believe he was imperious, petulant, exclusive, and dismissive. If Fenty, 39, loses to DC Council chair Vincent Gray, 67, in the September 14 mayoral primary, political scientists will study the fall from power as a historic one. Here are five reasons to vote for—or against—the two leading candidates.

Adrian Fenty


1. Michelle Rhee and Allen Y. Lew.
Fenty took over the perennially poor-performing DC public schools, luring Rhee here to reform the teaching system and Lew to fix the buildings. They have.

2. Taxis and tourism. Fenty forced cabs to install meters, which made them more user-friendly for tourists, and he burnished the capital’s image as a safe and lively destination.

3. Homelessness.
Adopting the “housing first” approach, Fenty made DC’s program into a model for the nation. It recently housed its 1,000th family.

4. Bricks and mortar—and dirt.
Fenty built or refurbished eight libraries and has started work on seven more. Lew’s crews refurbished athletic fields at 10 high schools, built or renovated 31 schools, and fixed bathrooms, boilers, and roofs across town. Rundown playgrounds and rec centers now teem with kids.

5. Leadership. Fenty is a strong, decisive executive who sets clear goals, expects his managers to accomplish them, and often achieves what he wants.


1. Michelle Rhee.
Opponents despise her dictatorial style, her closing of schools, her firing of teachers.

2. Secrecy. Fenty held one free-for-all press conference in his first term. When he traveled, he refused to disclose his destination, purpose, or source of funding, whether on official business or for pleasure.

3. Autocracy. Fenty fought with the city council on petty and programmatic matters. Hating process, he closed the government to community groups and activists.

4. Cronyism. Fenty’s government bestowed millions of dollars in construction contracts on a small group of his friends; his lack of contrition made matters worse.

5. Candle power. Fenty has shown an inability to think on his feet.



Media & Politics
Subscribe to Washingtonian

Discuss this story

Feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. The Washingtonian reserves the right to remove or edit content once posted.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Posted at 12:00 AM/ET, 08/23/2010 RSS | Print | Permalink | Comments () | Articles