Rolling Stone has just published a significant profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, President Obama's commander in Afghanistan, and I think it's safe to say that neither the General nor his Commander in Chief are having a good morning now that it's out. McChrystal gave Michael Hastings, the profile's author, significant access to him, but instead of producing a puff piece, that decision may well cost McChrystal his job. Here's why:
1. Obama's fired a general before—specifically, McChrystal's predecessor. Having broken the taboo against relieving a wartime commander once, it might be a lot easier for him to do it again. The piece on Obama:
Taking the advice of both the Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he also fired Gen. David McKiernan – then the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan – and replaced him with a man he didn’t know and had met only briefly: Gen. Stanley McChrystal. It was the first time a top general had been relieved from duty during wartime in more than 50 years, since Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur at the height of the Korean War.
2. His comments in the article might qualify him for court-martial. According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice "Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct." Some of McChrystal's remarks as reported in the piece may qualify—as may those of some of his advisers:
Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect. The general first encountered Obama a week after he took office, when the president met with a dozen senior military officials in a room at the Pentagon known as the Tank. According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked “uncomfortable and intimidated” by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn’t go much better. “It was a 10-minute photo op,” says an adviser to McChrystal. “Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going to run his fucking war, but he didn’t seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed.”
…
In private, Team McChrystal likes to talk shit about many of Obama’s top people on the diplomatic side. One aide calls Jim Jones, a retired four-star general and veteran of the Cold War, a “clown” who remains “stuck in 1985.” Politicians like McCain and Kerry, says another aide, “turn up, have a meeting with Karzai, criticize him at the airport press conference, then get back for the Sunday talk shows. Frankly, it’s not very helpful.” Only Hillary Clinton receives good reviews from McChrystal’s inner circle.
3. Maybe he should have been fired before:
After Cpl. Pat Tillman, the former-NFL-star-turned-Ranger, was accidentally killed by his own troops in Afghanistan in April 2004, McChrystal took an active role in creating the impression that Tillman had died at the hands of Taliban fighters. He signed off on a falsified recommendation for a Silver Star that suggested Tillman had been killed by enemy fire. (McChrystal would later claim he didn’t read the recommendation closely enough – a strange excuse for a commander known for his laserlike attention to minute details.) A week later, McChrystal sent a memo up the chain of command, specifically warning that President Bush should avoid mentioning the cause of Tillman’s death. “If the circumstances of Corporal Tillman’s death become public,” he wrote, it could cause “public embarrassment” for the president.
He’s So Fired
Gen. Stanley McChrystal let Rolling Stone profile him. Here are the things in it that might cost him his job.
Rolling Stone has just published a significant profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, President Obama's commander in Afghanistan, and I think it's safe to say that neither the General nor his Commander in Chief are having a good morning now that it's out. McChrystal gave Michael Hastings, the profile's author, significant access to him, but instead of producing a puff piece, that decision may well cost McChrystal his job. Here's why:
1. Obama's fired a general before—specifically, McChrystal's predecessor. Having broken the taboo against relieving a wartime commander once, it might be a lot easier for him to do it again. The piece on Obama:
Taking the advice of both the Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he also fired Gen. David McKiernan – then the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan – and replaced him with a man he didn’t know and had met only briefly: Gen. Stanley McChrystal. It was the first time a top general had been relieved from duty during wartime in more than 50 years, since Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur at the height of the Korean War.
2. His comments in the article might qualify him for court-martial. According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice "Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct." Some of McChrystal's remarks as reported in the piece may qualify—as may those of some of his advisers:
Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect. The general first encountered Obama a week after he took office, when the president met with a dozen senior military officials in a room at the Pentagon known as the Tank. According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked “uncomfortable and intimidated” by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn’t go much better. “It was a 10-minute photo op,” says an adviser to McChrystal. “Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going to run his fucking war, but he didn’t seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed.”
…
In private, Team McChrystal likes to talk shit about many of Obama’s top people on the diplomatic side. One aide calls Jim Jones, a retired four-star general and veteran of the Cold War, a “clown” who remains “stuck in 1985.” Politicians like McCain and Kerry, says another aide, “turn up, have a meeting with Karzai, criticize him at the airport press conference, then get back for the Sunday talk shows. Frankly, it’s not very helpful.” Only Hillary Clinton receives good reviews from McChrystal’s inner circle.
3. Maybe he should have been fired before:
After Cpl. Pat Tillman, the former-NFL-star-turned-Ranger, was accidentally killed by his own troops in Afghanistan in April 2004, McChrystal took an active role in creating the impression that Tillman had died at the hands of Taliban fighters. He signed off on a falsified recommendation for a Silver Star that suggested Tillman had been killed by enemy fire. (McChrystal would later claim he didn’t read the recommendation closely
enough – a strange excuse for a commander known for his laserlike attention to minute details.) A week later, McChrystal sent a memo up the chain of command, specifically warning that President Bush should avoid mentioning the cause of Tillman’s death. “If the circumstances of Corporal Tillman’s death become public,” he wrote, it could cause “public embarrassment” for the president.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
Congress Is About to Hold a UFO Hearing. Here Are the Strange Things Washingtonians Are Seeing in the Sky.
Allan Lichtman: “I Am Going to Take Some Time Off to Assess Why I Was Wrong”
Washington Post Tells Employees: It’s Time to Return to the Office
Here’s What You Need to Know About DC’s Upcoming Metrobus Route Changes
Could Trump’s Second Term Spell the End of Home Rule in DC?
Washingtonian Magazine
November Issue: Top Doctors
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
The “DMV Roving Sketcher” Is Like a Courtroom Artist for Local Musicians
How the National Gallery of Art Is Experimenting With the Science of Lines
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This November
A New Book Captures DC’s Media Softball League
More from News & Politics
DC’s Metro Made a Comeback. Meet the Man Behind It.
The “DMV Roving Sketcher” Is Like a Courtroom Artist for Local Musicians
5 Things to Know About John Thune, the New Senate Majority Leader
Are Robot Dogs the Future of White House Security?
Where in the DC Area Will Elon Musk Live?
How the National Gallery of Art Is Experimenting With the Science of Lines
R. Eric Thomas Wants to Solve All Your Problems
Congress Is About to Hold a UFO Hearing. Here Are the Strange Things Washingtonians Are Seeing in the Sky.