The US Supreme Court today decided Maryland v. King, which asked the justices to determine whether the Fourth Amendment allows police to take and analyze DNA samples from suspects arrested and charged with serious crimes. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that taking a cheek swab of DNA is a reasonable police action under the Constitution. Read The Washingtonian’s May 2013 feature on the case and brutal rape in Salisbury, Maryland, that led to the Supreme Court taking up the issue.
Supreme Court Rules on Constitutionality of DNA Swabs
The US Supreme Court today decided Maryland v. King, which asked the justices to determine whether the Fourth Amendment allows police to take and analyze DNA samples from suspects arrested and charged with serious crimes. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that taking a cheek swab of DNA is a reasonable police action under the Constitution. Read The Washingtonian’s May 2013 feature on the case and brutal rape in Salisbury, Maryland, that led to the Supreme Court taking up the issue.
Must-Reads
October 2016: Let’s Go Out for Breakfast
More from News & Politics
The Washington Post Now Publishes Something Every Minute
Poll: Only 2 Percent of Voters Want Nationals to Win the World Series
66 Cent Coffee At Dunkin’ Donuts For National Coffee Day
The Word “Rigged” Is Having a Moment
DC Newsrooms’ Debate-Night Food, Ranked
If You Only See One Room at the New NGA East Building, Make It This One
This DC Illustrator’s Comics Are So Freaking Relatable
This Couple Is Having an Easier Time Selling Guns Than Coffee
Most Popular
The Best Cheap Restaurants in Washington, DC
100 Very Best Restaurants
9 New Restaurants to Try Now
How One Couple Transformed a Virginia Estate into the Ultimate Southern Lawn Party Wedding
I Was at the Montgomery Mall During the Shooting. This Is What It Was Like Inside.