While Congress busies itself with tearing down the District’s reproductive-health laws, it is set on allowing locals at least one small measure of freedom. The longtime prohibition on sledding down Capitol Hill is set to fall thanks to a provision inserted into the Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 2016, which passed out of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday and is now headed for a full vote.
Dating back to 1876, the sledding ban has been more stringently enforced in the name of “national security” since 9/11. But the movement for the right to sled down Washington’s most visible slope kicked up in February after an unnamed committee chairman dispatched Capitol Police to scare away a rabble of youngsters who attempted to sled down a fresh blanket of snow. In response, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s non-voting delegate in the House, declared her intentions to end the sledding ban once and for all.
Norton’s goal appears to have been achieved, thanks to some legislative wrangling from Representative Sam Farr, a California Democrat who sits on the Appropriations Committee.
“Children with sleds are not a threat to our national security,” Farr says in a press release.
Farr’s amendment does not technically overturn the sledding ban, but it instructs Capitol Police to ignore it in favor of more pressing law-enforcement duties, like monitoring traffic and trying to remember not to leave service weapons in the bathroom.
But more than Norton, what might have moved Congress the most on this issue is the Great Sled Uprising of March 5, when, following another snowstorm that resulted in DC Public closing for the day, dozens of children ascended Capitol Hill, sleds and toboggans in tow, and brazenly defied the law. The few Capitol Police officers patrolling the sleepy mound that afternoon were easily overwhelmed and made no attempt to stop the fun.
“In a Congress that doesn’t solve problems they solved one problem,” says Tim Krepp, a tour guide and parent who accompanied his rebellious kids to the snowy insurrection. “It’s one small step forward.”
While the potential end to the sledding ban is encouraging for the District’s struggle for greater autonomy, it pales against a House vote last night to strike down a recent District law that would prevent employers from dismissing workers based on choices they make about birth control and reproductive health. Although the White House says President Obama will veto the move, it still marks the first time in more than three decades Congress has formally used its authority to overturn legislation passed by the DC Council.
“The juxtaposition of allowing sledding while also stripping away our rights is hard to take,” says Krepp.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Capitol Hill Sledding Ban Set to Fall
Language in an appropriations bill would order Capitol Police to stand down against people seeking snowy fun.
While Congress busies itself with tearing down the District’s reproductive-health laws, it is set on allowing locals at least one small measure of freedom. The longtime prohibition on sledding down Capitol Hill is set to fall thanks to a provision inserted into the Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 2016, which passed out of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday and is now headed for a full vote.
Dating back to 1876, the sledding ban has been more stringently enforced in the name of “national security” since 9/11. But the movement for the right to sled down Washington’s most visible slope kicked up in February after an unnamed committee chairman dispatched Capitol Police to scare away a rabble of youngsters who attempted to sled down a fresh blanket of snow. In response, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s non-voting delegate in the House, declared her intentions to end the sledding ban once and for all.
Norton’s goal appears to have been achieved, thanks to some legislative wrangling from Representative Sam Farr, a California Democrat who sits on the Appropriations Committee.
“Children with sleds are not a threat to our national security,” Farr says in a press release.
Farr’s amendment does not technically overturn the sledding ban, but it instructs Capitol Police to ignore it in favor of more pressing law-enforcement duties, like monitoring traffic and trying to remember not to leave service weapons in the bathroom.
But more than Norton, what might have moved Congress the most on this issue is the Great Sled Uprising of March 5, when, following another snowstorm that resulted in DC Public closing for the day, dozens of children ascended Capitol Hill, sleds and toboggans in tow, and brazenly defied the law. The few Capitol Police officers patrolling the sleepy mound that afternoon were easily overwhelmed and made no attempt to stop the fun.
“In a Congress that doesn’t solve problems they solved one problem,” says Tim Krepp, a tour guide and parent who accompanied his rebellious kids to the snowy insurrection. “It’s one small step forward.”
While the potential end to the sledding ban is encouraging for the District’s struggle for greater autonomy, it pales against a House vote last night to strike down a recent District law that would prevent employers from dismissing workers based on choices they make about birth control and reproductive health. Although the White House says President Obama will veto the move, it still marks the first time in more than three decades Congress has formally used its authority to overturn legislation passed by the DC Council.
“The juxtaposition of allowing sledding while also stripping away our rights is hard to take,” says Krepp.
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
Ed Martin’s Nomination Is in Trouble, Trump Wants to Rename Veterans Day, and Political Drama Continues in Virginia
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
“I’m Angry at Elon Musk”: Former US Digital Service Workers on DOGE, the “Fork in the Road,” and Trump’s First 100 Days
DC and Commanders Will Announce Stadium Deal Today, Virginia GOP Candidate Accuses Virginia Governor’s Team of Extortion, and Trump Says He Runs the Entire World
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Viral DC-Area Food Truck Flavor Hive Has It in the Bag
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
The Smithsonian’s Surprisingly Dangerous Early Days
An Unusual DC Novel Turns Out to Have an Interesting Explanation
More from News & Politics
At Arena Stage Gala, Rutter Dances and Norton Falters
Ed Martin’s Nomination Is in Trouble, Trump Wants to Rename Veterans Day, and Political Drama Continues in Virginia
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This May
Trump’s DC Prosecutor, a Former J6 Defense Lawyer, Holds Meeting to Address Crime on Capitol Hill
“Absolute Despair”: An NIH Worker on Job and Budget Cuts, RFK Jr., and Trump’s First 100 Days
Tesla’s Also Sick of DOGE, Alexandria Wants to Censor a Student Newspaper, and We Highlight Some Excellent Soul Food
Amazon Avoids President’s Wrath Over Tariff Price Hikes, DC Budget Fix May Be Doomed, and Trump Would Like to Be Pope
“Pointed Cruelty”: A Former USAID Worker on Cuts, Life After Layoffs, and Trump’s First 100 Days