The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority says no more political or issue-based advertisements will appear at its stations or on its vehicles this year, an apparent response to a New York group’s latest attempt place potentially incindiary billboards around DC’s public transportation network.
While Metro spokesman Dan Stessel tells Washingtonian the move, which was approved unanimously during Thursday’s board meeting, is unrelated to any specific advertisement, the timing and circumstances are impossible to overlook. The decision comes one day after Pamela Geller, an anti-Islam activist, announced she would be purchasing ad space to display the winning artwork from a “Draw Muhammad” contest she staged earlier this month. (Depictions of the prophet are barred by Islamic law.) The contest, held in Garland, Texas, made headlines nationallly after two gunmen started a firefight with security guards outside the venue hosting the event. While both gunmen were killed, the terror group ISIS claimed responsibility for their actions.
“Pursuant to its powers…to regulate the use of facilities owned or controlled by the Authority, the Board hereby directs management to close WMATA’s advertising space to any and all issue-oriented advertising, including but not limited to, political, religious, and advocacy advertising until the end of the calendar year,” the WMATA resolution reads. “During this period, the board will review what role such issue-oriented advertising has in WMATA’s mission to deliver safe, equitable, and reliable transportation services to the Nation’s Capital, and will seek public comment and participation for its consideration before making a final policy determination.”
Stessel says Geller’s name never came up in the discussion leading up to the ad ban, but the Washington Post‘s Paul Duggan reports that her planned ads gave at least one member of Metro’s board a fright.
Metro official says agency fears a cartoon ad of the Prophet Muhammad would make buses and subway stations “terrorists targets.”
This would hardly be the first time Geller has provoked a change in Metro’s advertising policy. In 2012, the transit agency refused to post billboards by her group, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, that featured Koran verses accompanied by photographs of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Geller sued, and a judge ordered the transit agency that it could not decline ads based on their political stripes; Metro attached disclaimers to political ads following the ruling.
Although political ads make up a significant portion of Metro’s advertising revenue, overall ad sales are a puny segment of the cash-strapped transit agency’s budget. Metro’s projected ad revenue for the current fiscal year—calculated long before this decision—is just $20 million, compared to $48 million in parking fees and $835 million in passenger fares. There is no word yet on how much of a financial toll will come from cutting out political ads.
Metro Bans Political Advertisements for the Rest of the Year
The decision comes a day after a controversial anti-Islam group said it would buy bus ads.
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority says no more political or issue-based advertisements will appear at its stations or on its vehicles this year, an apparent response to a New York group’s latest attempt place potentially incindiary billboards around DC’s public transportation network.
While Metro spokesman Dan Stessel tells Washingtonian the move, which was approved unanimously during Thursday’s board meeting, is unrelated to any specific advertisement, the timing and circumstances are impossible to overlook. The decision comes one day after Pamela Geller, an anti-Islam activist, announced she would be purchasing ad space to display the winning artwork from a “Draw Muhammad” contest she staged earlier this month. (Depictions of the prophet are barred by Islamic law.) The contest, held in Garland, Texas, made headlines nationallly after two gunmen started a firefight with security guards outside the venue hosting the event. While both gunmen were killed, the terror group ISIS claimed responsibility for their actions.
“Pursuant to its powers…to regulate the use of facilities owned or controlled by the Authority, the Board hereby directs management to close WMATA’s advertising space to any and all issue-oriented advertising, including but not limited to, political, religious, and advocacy advertising until the end of the calendar year,” the WMATA resolution reads. “During this period, the board will review what role such issue-oriented advertising has in WMATA’s mission to deliver safe, equitable, and reliable transportation services to the Nation’s Capital, and will seek public comment and participation for its consideration before making a final policy determination.”
Stessel says Geller’s name never came up in the discussion leading up to the ad ban, but the Washington Post‘s Paul Duggan reports that her planned ads gave at least one member of Metro’s board a fright.
This would hardly be the first time Geller has provoked a change in Metro’s advertising policy. In 2012, the transit agency refused to post billboards by her group, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, that featured Koran verses accompanied by photographs of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Geller sued, and a judge ordered the transit agency that it could not decline ads based on their political stripes; Metro attached disclaimers to political ads following the ruling.
Although political ads make up a significant portion of Metro’s advertising revenue, overall ad sales are a puny segment of the cash-strapped transit agency’s budget. Metro’s projected ad revenue for the current fiscal year—calculated long before this decision—is just $20 million, compared to $48 million in parking fees and $835 million in passenger fares. There is no word yet on how much of a financial toll will come from cutting out political ads.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
DC and Commanders Will Announce Stadium Deal Today, Virginia GOP Candidate Accuses Virginia Governor’s Team of Extortion, and Trump Says He Runs the Entire World
Elon Musk Got in a Shouting Match at the White House, a Teen Was Stabbed in Fairfax, and Pete Hegseth Decided the Pentagon Needed a Makeup Studio
“I’m Angry at Elon Musk”: Former US Digital Service Workers on DOGE, the “Fork in the Road,” and Trump’s First 100 Days
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Viral DC-Area Food Truck Flavor Hive Has It in the Bag
DC Takes Maryland and Virginia Drivers to Court
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
The Smithsonian’s Surprisingly Dangerous Early Days
More from News & Politics
“Absolute Despair”: An NIH Worker on Job and Budget Cuts, RFK Jr., and Trump’s First 100 Days
Tesla’s Also Sick of DOGE, Alexandria Wants to Censor a Student Newspaper, and We Highlight Some Excellent Soul Food
Amazon Avoids President’s Wrath Over Tariff Price Hikes, DC Budget Fix May Be Doomed, and Trump Would Like to Be Pope
“Pointed Cruelty”: A Former USAID Worker on Cuts, Life After Layoffs, and Trump’s First 100 Days
Is Ed Martin’s Denunciation of a J6 Rioter Sincere? A Reporter Who Covers Him Is Skeptical.
DC Takes Maryland and Virginia Drivers to Court
Both of Washington’s Cardinals Will Vote at the Conclave
“I’m Angry at Elon Musk”: Former US Digital Service Workers on DOGE, the “Fork in the Road,” and Trump’s First 100 Days