Photograph courtesy of National Gallery of Art, Gift of Dian Woodner.
Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
Why a DC Museum Acquired This Odd Drawing
It’s by Leonardo da Vinci, not Dr. Seuss.
Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
This article appears in the January 2023 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Most Powerful Women in Washington 2025
Trump’s Shutdown Antics Vex Republicans, Ireland Hopes to Sell Its DC Embassy, and Renaissance Festival Sues Most Foul Varlets
Abigail Spanberger and the Virginia Governor Race: Can “Boring” Politics Win?
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People of 2025
IRS Tells Furloughed Feds They’ll Get Back Pay After Trump Says They Might Not, Trump Lands a Big Peace Deal, and Publix Is Coming to NoVa
Washingtonian Magazine
October Issue: Most Powerful Women
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Want to Live in a DC Firehouse?
DC Punk Explored in Three New History Books
The Local Group Fighting to Keep Virginia’s Space Shuttle
Alexandria’s “Fancy Pigeon” Has a New Home
More from News & Politics
Eduardo Peñalver Will Be Georgetown University’s 49th President
Cheryl Hines Suddenly Has a Lot to Say About RFK Jr. and MAGA
Shutdown Hits Two-Week Mark, House Speaker Feels Threatened by Naked Cyclists, and Big Balls’ Attackers Get Probation
Anti-Trump Encampment Returns to Union Station After Bizarre Permit Revocation Saga
White House Signals Very Long Shutdown, Commanders Game Ends in Heartbreak, and Betting Markets Sour on Jay Jones
DC Singer Kenny Iko Is Turning Heads on “The Voice”
Trump Lays Off Thousands, Blames Shutdown; Ed Martin Spitter Won’t Go to Prison; Jimmy Kimmel Sponsors Georgetown Player
New Anacostia Market Is a Dream Come True for Community