Subscribe Now »

Special Holiday Deal

Give the Gift of the

Give one person a magazine subscription for $29.95, and get each additional subscription for just $19.95.

Newsletters

Get Where+When delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.

AFI Docs Review: “The Trials of Muhammad Ali”
Bill Siegel looks at a particularly tumultuous period during the life and career of the greatest fighter of all time. By Chris Campbell
Still of The Trials of Muhammad Ali via AFI Docs.
Comments () | Published June 13, 2013

Before online petitions and social media made it as easy as the click of a mouse, to protest in America could mean facing professional, social, and financial ruin, as well as a possible prison sentence. Bill Siegel’s The Trials of Muhammad Ali looks at a tumultuous period during the incomparable fighter’s life, when as an already divisive figure, he stood his ground, affirmed his faith, and protested against what he saw as an unjust war. But by seeking to cover the many different facets of Ali’s life, the film often seems to zigzag over the highs and lows of his career without finding its focus.

The images and the quotes from newsreel interviews with Ali in the ’60s and ’70s certainly reinforce the narrative of a life spent struggling with issues of race and religion, but the additional attempts to frame these events within a larger context come up short. The opening scene from a British talk show reveals Ali listening to host David Susskind refer to him as “a simplistic fool and a pawn,” while the fighter remains utterly cool and expressionless. Nothing from the film’s present-day interviews can match the composure Ali expresses in that single 30-second clip.

The movie explores Ali’s conversion to Islam, the changing of his name (from Cassius Clay), and his bold decision to protest the Vietnam War and to face prison time rather than enlist. The reaction it engenders is stark and undeniable, and Ali faces constant pressure to defend and explain himself. In a brutal Floyd Patterson fight, Patterson refuses to call him anything but Cassius Clay, so Ali strategically pummels him for 12 rounds.

Siegel, who also directed 2002’s Oscar-nominated documentary The Weather Underground, makes some occasionally suspect decisions with the subject matter, leaning heavily on Ali’s Islamic faith while at times glossing over related controversies. In one particular sequence, Ali’s friendship with Malcolm X is highlighted, but the film speeds right through the debate over the Nation of Islam’s alleged participation in Malcolm X’s assassination. Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, in a present-day interview, denies any involvement by the organization, and the film moves on and drops the issue entirely.

By the conclusion, when Ali’s indisputably thrilling journey—from prize fighter to political lightning rod to recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom—has been documented, it’s hard not to feel that Trials has meandered through myriad clips for 90 minutes rather than focus on a particular argument or vision.

When We Were Kings still stands as the best documentary about Ali the man, while the recent ESPN Films’ Muhammad and Larry is a powerful and thoroughly upsetting doc about Ali the fighter. Ali proclaimed himself to be “the greatest,” and Trials, while engaging at times, never quite rises to that standard.

Playing June 21, noon, at the National Portrait Gallery, and June 23, 2:45 PM, at the Newseum.

Categories:

Film Movies
Subscribe to Washingtonian

Discuss this story

Feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. The Washingtonian reserves the right to remove or edit content once posted.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Posted at 04:55 PM/ET, 06/13/2013 RSS | Print | Permalink | Comments () | Washingtonian.com Blogs