The suspense continues over how the Supreme Court will rule in cases deciding the
constitutionality of California’s same-sex marriage ban and the Defense of Marriage
Act. But the court has handed down two other highly anticipated rulings this week,
both regarding the treatment of racial minorities—and both involving the same lawyer, Bert Rein.
Though Rein cofounded the firm Wiley Rein in 1983, he’s often overshadowed by its
other name partner: the higher-profile, former FCC chairman Richard Wiley. But this week, Rein is the one in the spotlight.
The former deputy assistant secretary of state during the Nixon administration focuses
on antitrust, commercial litigation, and food and drug law. Rein is certainly not
known as a Supreme Court lawyer, but this term, he found himself arguing twice before
the justices—his first ever appearances at the high court.
In his first case, he advocated for Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian woman who claimed the affirmative action policy at the University of
Texas prevented her from being admitted. In his second case, he argued on behalf of
Shelby County, Alabama, that a key piece of the Voting Rights Act—the landmark civil
rights legislation passed to combat voter discrimination—should not have been reauthorized
by Congress.
The high court—sort of—decided Fisher v. University of Texas at Austinyesterday. In a 7-1 decision, with Elena Kagan recusing herself, the justices sent the case back to the lower appellate court to
reevaluate the college’s policy. It was neither a loss nor a win for Rein.
But today, Rein got a clear victory when the justices decided Shelby County v. Holder. They determined in a 5-4 ruling that section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.
The historic decision will be among the most
controversial of the term and has already been denounced by President Obama, who called it “a setback” for
efforts to end discrimination.
So how did Rein, a newbie at the high court, land such big cases? Edward Blum, a former stockbroker backed by
conservative donors and the founder of the Project
on Fair
Representation, found
plaintiffs for both Fisher and Shelby County, convinced them to file their lawsuits,
and linked them up with Rein. Blum reportedly
first got connected with Wiley Rein, widely regarded as a
Republican-leaning firm,
nearly two decades ago when he himself was a plaintiff in a case involving a Texas
redistricting plan,
a matter handled by another attorney at Wiley Rein.
So, for now, it’s Bert Rein’s week. But the attention will certainly shift tomorrow,
when the justices appear poised to finally hand down the same-sex marriage rulings.
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 as a staff writer, and became a senior editor in 2014. She oversees the magazine’s real estate and home design coverage, and writes long-form feature stories. She was a 2020 Livingston Award finalist for her two-part investigation into a wrongful conviction stemming from a murder in rural Virginia.
Meet the Lawyer Involved in Both of This Week’s Big Race-Based Supreme Court Cases
How did Bert Rein land such high-profile projects?
The suspense continues over how the Supreme Court will rule in cases deciding the
constitutionality of California’s same-sex marriage ban and the Defense of Marriage
Act. But the court has handed down two other highly anticipated rulings this week,
both regarding the treatment of racial minorities—and both involving the same lawyer,
Bert Rein.
Though Rein cofounded the firm Wiley Rein in 1983, he’s often overshadowed by its
other name partner: the higher-profile, former FCC chairman
Richard Wiley. But this week, Rein is the one in the spotlight.
The former deputy assistant secretary of state during the Nixon administration focuses
on antitrust, commercial litigation, and food and drug law. Rein is certainly not
known as a Supreme Court lawyer, but this term, he found himself arguing twice before
the justices—his first ever appearances at the high court.
In his first case, he advocated for
Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian woman who claimed the affirmative action policy at the University of
Texas prevented her from being admitted. In his second case, he argued on behalf of
Shelby County, Alabama, that a key piece of the Voting Rights Act—the landmark civil
rights legislation passed to combat voter discrimination—should not have been reauthorized
by Congress.
The high court—sort of—decided
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin yesterday. In a 7-1 decision, with
Elena Kagan recusing herself, the justices sent the case back to the lower appellate court to
reevaluate the college’s policy. It was neither a loss nor a win for Rein.
But today, Rein got a clear victory when the justices decided
Shelby County v. Holder. They determined in a 5-4 ruling that section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.
The historic decision will be among the most
controversial of the term and has already been denounced by
President Obama, who called it “a setback” for
efforts to end discrimination.
So how did Rein, a newbie at the high court, land such big cases?
Edward Blum, a former stockbroker backed by
conservative donors and the founder of the Project
on Fair
Representation, found
plaintiffs for both
Fisher and
Shelby County, convinced them to file their lawsuits,
and linked them up with Rein. Blum reportedly
first got connected with Wiley Rein, widely regarded as a
Republican-leaning firm,
nearly two decades ago when he himself was a plaintiff in a
case involving a Texas
redistricting plan,
a matter handled by another attorney at Wiley Rein.
So, for now, it’s Bert Rein’s week. But the attention will certainly shift tomorrow,
when the justices appear poised to finally hand down the same-sex marriage rulings.
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 as a staff writer, and became a senior editor in 2014. She oversees the magazine’s real estate and home design coverage, and writes long-form feature stories. She was a 2020 Livingston Award finalist for her two-part investigation into a wrongful conviction stemming from a murder in rural Virginia.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The Trucker Convoy Has Given Up on DC Yet Again. We Tried One Last Time to Find Out What They Wanted.
Washington DC’s 500 Most Influential People
The Untold Story of the White House’s Weirdly Hip Record Collection
Number of Chesapeake Bay Blue Crabs Hits Record Low
2022 Tech Titans
Washingtonian Magazine
May 2022: Fantastic Foodie Getaways
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
A Johnny Cash Statue Is Coming to the Capitol
LGBTQ Pioneer Barney Frank’s Story Is Now a Graphic Novel
Inside the Effort to Revamp the DC Archives
This DC Poet Was Once the USSR’s Biggest Kid Actor
More from News & Politics
The Trucker Convoy Has Given Up on DC Yet Again. We Tried One Last Time to Find Out What They Wanted.
Number of Chesapeake Bay Blue Crabs Hits Record Low
The Lincoln Memorial Is 100 Years Old. Here’s How to Celebrate It.
The Hill’s Newsroom Petitions to Unionize
2022 Tech Titans
A Johnny Cash Statue Is Coming to the Capitol
7 Things to Know About Karine Jean-Pierre, the New White House Press Secretary
PHOTOS: Weekend Pro-Choice Rally and March in DC