News

Is Washington a Real City?

Define real.
Photograph via Shutterstock.

The Charge: We’re not a real city.

The Defense: Define “real.”

The argument that Washington is a phony town is fairly simple—after all, someone literally invented it. And, like the manmade capitals of countries as far-flung as Australia, Brazil, and Pakistan, it was a pretty empty place for a long while.

Of course, unlike brand-new counterparts—Myanmar’s capital was established barely a decade ago in what was once sugar-cane fields and rice paddies—we’ve had 200-plus years to grow an actual city atop the planners’ grid. Which is why, these days, the allegation leans more on the idea that Washington is a land of transients, lacking the old ethnic neighborhoods of a place like Philadelphia.

And we’re lucky for it. People migrate to cities that are economically and culturally vital. That ambitious types from Kansas or Connecticut move to the Beltway is a sign of health. So is the fact that our major suburban counties are nearly a third foreign-born. Would you prefer living in a place newcomers avoid?

This article appears in our Defense of Washington feature in the March 2016 issue of Washingtonian.

Get Washingtonian’s Daily DC Updates (Not Just Another Political News Roundup)

Questions or comments? You can reach us on Twitter, via e-mail, or by contacting the author directly:
Editor

Michael Schaffer has been editor of Washingtonian since 2014. A former editor of Washington City Paper and editorial director of The New Republic, Michael is also the author of One Nation Under Dog, a 2009 book about America’s obsession with pets. A DC native, he currently lives in Chevy Chase DC with his wife and their two daughters.