Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
Why a DC Museum Acquired This Odd Drawing
It’s by Leonardo da Vinci, not Dr. Seuss.
Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
This article appears in the January 2023 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Miss Maryland USA Bailey Anne on Her Ceiling-Shattering Win
Report: Obama’s Book Says He Continued to Smoke in the White House—a Lot
DC Councilmember Trayon White Charged With Bribery
How to See DC’s Supermoon This Week
Time Magazine’s Kid of the Year Is a Fairfax High Schooler Trying to Cure Skin Cancer
Washingtonian Magazine
September: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This September
An Anonymous Send-Up of Sidwell Friends Has People Talking
When Presidents Clash With CEOs
Where Kamala Harris Shops Around DC
More from News & Politics
Northern Virginia’s Political Sign Wars Heat Up as the Presidential Election Approaches
Spotted Lanternflies Are Back. Here’s How to Deal With Them.
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This September
Allan Lichtman Is Very Comfortable About Predicting the 2024 Election
Meet DDOT’s Robot, Which They Promise Won’t Give You a Parking Ticket
These Are the Conservative Commentators Who Allegedly Got Hoodwinked (and Indirectly Paid!) by Russia
It’s Official: “Love Is Blind DC” Is Premiering in October
An Anonymous Send-Up of Sidwell Friends Has People Talking