Photograph courtesy of National Gallery of Art, Gift of Dian Woodner.
Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
Why a DC Museum Acquired This Odd Drawing
It’s by Leonardo da Vinci, not Dr. Seuss.
Okay, so it’s not exactly “Mona Lisa.” But this tiny drawing—just two and a half by two inches—is a genuine work by Leonardo da Vinci, and it was recently donated to the National Gallery of Art. “Grotesque Head of an Old Woman,” as it’s called (for obvious reasons), dates to the late 1400s, and it’s one of about 30 such studies he did on physiognomy, or human facial expressions and features. “He’s trying to get at how to represent personality and character and individuality,” says Jonathan Bober, senior curator of prints and drawings at the National Gallery. The way Leonardo exaggerates the woman’s appearance in order to capture something about her was remarkable at the time, Bober says. Plus, “there’s a sympathy to the simple fact of rendering such a physically grotesque type, but with such care and with such delicacy.” (The museum currently has no plans to put the drawing on permanent display.)
So why does it look like something from a kids’ book? Bober suggests a link between this odd image and modern comic depictions: While “by no means a direct line, it’s an ancestor of the tradition that leads to modern cartoons, political cartoons, and even animated children’s cartoons.”
This article appears in the January 2023 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Inside a DC Bar’s Long, Strange Quest to Rent a Groundhog
A Green Comet Is Getting Close to Earth. Here’s How You Can See It.
Whatever Happened to Permanent Daylight Saving Time?
Why Did Rebecca Romney Move to DC?
PHOTOS: Gordon Ramsay’s Hell’s Kitchen Opening Celebration
Washingtonian Magazine
February 2023: 100 Very Best Restaurants
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Best Things to Do in the DC Area 2/2-2/5: DC Travel Show, “Bars and Measures” play, and Port City Brewing Party
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This February
Why Did Rebecca Romney Move to DC?
What If January 6 Had Worked? A Comic Explores That Disturbing Premise.
More from News & Politics
Coachella Sues Moechella, Saying the DC Protests Infringe on the Music Festival’s Trademark
Metro Head Randy Clarke Talks About How It’s Going So Far
Talking Movies With George Pelecanos, Who Is Showcasing Some of His Favorite ’70s Films at AFI Silver
Inside a DC Bar’s Long, Strange Quest to Rent a Groundhog
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This February
Why Did Rebecca Romney Move to DC?
PHOTOS: Gordon Ramsay’s Hell’s Kitchen Opening Celebration
DC Statehood Advocates Shrug Off Joe Biden’s License Plate “Snub”