There’s no shortage of ideas for how to fix congressional dysfunction, including campaign-finance and ethics reform. But two DC architects, Andrew Linn and Jack Becker of the studio BLDUS, have a different solution: Why not make members of Congress live together?
As part of a design lab they taught at the Virginia Tech School of Architecture last semester, Linn and Becker charged students with designing the “House’s House,” a neighborhood for Congress members and other Hill employees. The proposal would use existing surface parking lots to build a mixed-use community around the Hill.
Life on the Hill could be transformed. Representatives would mingle as they drop their children off at school, go shopping and do laundry, or duck into a conference room for a meeting. The two political parties don’t agree on much, said Linn when we met up with him in December, his point underscored by the fact that Congress was at that moment trying to prevent a government shutdown before the holidays. “But the benefits of living and spending time together is one of those things.”
The idea has precedent. Rory Cooper, former communications director for then–House majority leader Eric Cantor, has praised the merits of dorm-style housing, in part because the high cost of the area’s real estate can discourage people who aren’t wealthy from running for office. And, at the recommendation of the House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, lawmakers recently added three coworking spaces on the Hill as part of an effort to increase bipartisanship.
Linn and Becker have met with former Colorado representative Ed Perlmutter, who served on the committee, to press their concept. They’re well aware of the odds—making such an ambitious project happen would require overcoming the exact partisan enmity the plan is intended to combat. But they still believe that it’s worth pushing for a reenvisioned Capitol Hill, one that boasts fewer surface parking lots and more social interaction among lawmakers. Says Linn: “It’s an idea that in a slightly altered political climate might have legs.”
Should Congress Have to Live Together?
A long-shot proposal would build a lawmaker community.
There’s no shortage of ideas for how to fix congressional dysfunction, including campaign-finance and ethics reform. But two DC architects, Andrew Linn and Jack Becker of the studio BLDUS, have a different solution: Why not make members of Congress live together?
As part of a design lab they taught at the Virginia Tech School of Architecture last semester, Linn and Becker charged students with designing the “House’s House,” a neighborhood for Congress members and other Hill employees. The proposal would use existing surface parking lots to build a mixed-use community around the Hill.
Life on the Hill could be transformed. Representatives would mingle as they drop their children off at school, go shopping and do laundry, or duck into a conference room for a meeting. The two political parties don’t agree on much, said Linn when we met up with him in December, his point underscored by the fact that Congress was at that moment trying to prevent a government shutdown before the holidays. “But the benefits of living and spending time together is one of those things.”
The idea has precedent. Rory Cooper, former communications director for then–House majority leader Eric Cantor, has praised the merits of dorm-style housing, in part because the high cost of the area’s real estate can discourage people who aren’t wealthy from running for office. And, at the recommendation of the House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, lawmakers recently added three coworking spaces on the Hill as part of an effort to increase bipartisanship.
Linn and Becker have met with former Colorado representative Ed Perlmutter, who served on the committee, to press their concept. They’re well aware of the odds—making such an ambitious project happen would require overcoming the exact partisan enmity the plan is intended to combat. But they still believe that it’s worth pushing for a reenvisioned Capitol Hill, one that boasts fewer surface parking lots and more social interaction among lawmakers. Says Linn: “It’s an idea that in a slightly altered political climate might have legs.”
This article appears in the February 2025 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
DC and Commanders Will Announce Stadium Deal Today, Virginia GOP Candidate Accuses Virginia Governor’s Team of Extortion, and Trump Says He Runs the Entire World
Elon Musk Got in a Shouting Match at the White House, a Teen Was Stabbed in Fairfax, and Pete Hegseth Decided the Pentagon Needed a Makeup Studio
“I’m Angry at Elon Musk”: Former US Digital Service Workers on DOGE, the “Fork in the Road,” and Trump’s First 100 Days
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Viral DC-Area Food Truck Flavor Hive Has It in the Bag
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters
The Smithsonian’s Surprisingly Dangerous Early Days
Does Eleanor Holmes Norton Still Have What It Takes to Fight for DC?
More from News & Politics
Amazon Avoids President’s Wrath Over Tariff Price Hikes, DC Budget Fix May Be Doomed, and Trump Would Like to Be Pope
“Pointed Cruelty”: A Former USAID Worker on Cuts, Life After Layoffs, and Trump’s First 100 Days
Is Ed Martin’s Denunciation of a J6 Rioter Sincere? A Reporter Who Covers Him Is Skeptical.
DC Takes Maryland and Virginia Drivers to Court
Both of Washington’s Cardinals Will Vote at the Conclave
“I’m Angry at Elon Musk”: Former US Digital Service Workers on DOGE, the “Fork in the Road,” and Trump’s First 100 Days
Trump Marks 100 Very Weird Days in DC, Wharf Sold to Canadians, and We Round Up Capitals Watch Parties
Slugging Makes a Comeback for DC Area Commuters